Literature DB >> 19339154

Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments.

Jonathan P Van Kleunen1, Gwo-Chin Lee, Peter W Lementowski, Charles L Nelson, Jonathan P Garino.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of trabecular metal (TM) shells and augments in acetabular revisions with significant pelvic bone loss. We retrospectively reviewed 97 cases of consecutive loose total hip arthroplasty with a minimum of Paprosky grade IIA pelvic bone loss treated with a TM revision acetabular component with or without modular augments. The average Harris hip score improved from 55 preoperatively to 76 postoperatively. At the most recent radiographic evaluation, 88 cups demonstrated no lucent lines, 1 cup had lucent lines but remained well fixed, and 8 cups underwent resection arthroplasty for infection. One cup was revised for chronic instability. There were no aseptic failures in this series. Trabecular metal acetabular cups and shells with or without the use of modular augments can be effectively used to revise failed acetabular components in patients with substantial pelvic bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19339154     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  34 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

Authors:  S Winkler; F-X Köck; C Baier; H-R Springorum; A Beifuss; P Lechler; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Benjamin Bender; Catelyn Coyle; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Managing acetabular fractures in the elderly with fixation and primary arthroplasty: aiming for early weightbearing.

Authors:  Mark Rickman; James Young; Alex Trompeter; Rachel Pearce; Mark Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Acetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study with Minimum One-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Chirayu Dwivedi; Sandeep Gokhale; Hyun Gon Khim; Jeon Keon Oh; Won Yong Shon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-09-06

8.  Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Giachino; Paolo Bedino; Danilo Mellano; Raimondo Piana; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

Review 10.  Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Mark D Hasenauer; Wayne G Paprosky; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.