Literature DB >> 16950067

The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects.

Scott M Sporer1, Wayne G Paprosky.   

Abstract

Stable acetabular fixation cannot be reliably achieved with the use of a hemispherical porous coated component alone in patients with a Paprosky type IIIa defect. The purpose of the present study was to determine the short-term results of a tantalum porous coated hemispherical acetabular component supported with a modular tantalum augment in Paprosky type IIIa defects. A total of 28 patients (28 hips) were treated for a type IIIa acetabular defect between 2001 and 2003 with the use of a trabecular metal acetabular component supported with a modular, superiorly placed trabecular metal augment. At an average of 3.1 years follow-up, 1 patient required rerevision for recurrent instability. The remaining hips remain radiographically stable. Clinically, the patients' modified Postel Merle d'Aubigne score improved from 6.8 preoperatively to 10.6 postoperatively. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component with a superiorly placed trabecular metal augment demonstrates encouraging short-term results for Paprosky type IIIa acetabular defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950067     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  47 in total

1.  Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul T H Lee; Guy Raz; Oleg A Safir; David J Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

3.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The first 50 years of total hip arthroplasty: lessons learned.

Authors:  William H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Classifications in brief: Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss.

Authors:  Jessica J M Telleria; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Reconstruction of the acetabulum with structured bone graft in press-fit technique].

Authors:  Andreas Halder; Alexander Beier; Wolfram Neumann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Multicentre use of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component.

Authors:  Th A Xenakis; G A Macheras; K S Stafilas; A T Kostakos; K Bargiotas; K N Malizos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

Authors:  S Gravius; G Pagenstert; O Weber; N Kraska; H Röhrig; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.