| Literature DB >> 27713281 |
Hugo Cerecetto1, Mercedes González2.
Abstract
Chagas' disease, or American trypanosomosiasis, has been the most relevant illness produced by protozoa in Latin America. Synthetic medicinal chemistry efforts have provided an extensive number of chemodiverse hits at the "active-to-hit" stage. However, only a more limited number of these have been studied in vivo in models of Chagas' disease. Herein, we survey some of the cantidates able to surpass the "hit-to-lead" stage discussing their limitations or merit to enter in clinical trials in the short term.Entities:
Keywords: Chagas’ disease; drug-likeness; “hit-to-lead”
Year: 2010 PMID: 27713281 PMCID: PMC4034012 DOI: 10.3390/ph3040810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Chemical structures of clinical used drugs for Chagas’ disease.
Figure 2(a) Chemical structures of selected T. cruzi-enzymatic inhibitors. (b) Chemical structures of selected natural products with anti-T. cruzi activity. (c) Examples of medicinal chemistry based on natural products. (d) Chemical structures of examples of drug-profiling strategy in Chagas’ disease.
Figure 3Examples of anti-T. cruzi products emerging from the synthetic medicinal chemistry, hitherto at the “active-to-hit” development phase.
Figure 4Examples of anti-T. cruzi products emerging from the synthetic medicinal chemistry, hitherto at the “hit-to-lead” development phase.
Figure 5Examples of anti-T. cruzi products hitherto at the “hit-to-lead” development phase from our laboratory.
Drug-like properties of compounds described in Section 3.
| Compd. | Meets Lipinski’s rule | Meets Veber’s rule | Toxic effects1 | Alerts for mn2 | Carcinogenic - mutagenic effects2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| y (0)3 | y (0)3 | -0.984 | 0.545 | n6 | I7 | A8 | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -10.47 | 0.22 | y (m,i) | I | C | |
| n (2) | n (1) | 4.51 | 0.05 | y (m,t,i,r) | I | C | |
| y (1) | n (1) | -9.42 | 0.16 | y (i,r) | I | C | |
| y (1) | y (0) | -4.34 | 0.13 | y (i,r) | I | C | |
| y (1) | n (1) | 0.48 | 0.29 | y (i) | I | C | |
| n (3) | n (2) | 1.21 | 0.41 | y (i) | I | C | |
| n (2) | y (0) | -2.68 | 0.05 | y (m,t,i) | I | A,F | |
| y (1) | y (0) | -3.08 | 0.14 | n | II | C | |
| y (1) | y (0) | 0.38 | 0.28 | n | II | C,D | |
| y (1) | y (0) | -2.61 | 0.29 | n | II | C | |
| y (1) | n (1) | -9 | - | - | I | C | |
| y (1) | n (1) | - | - | - | I | C | |
| n (2) | n (1) | - | - | - | I | C | |
| y (1) | y (0) | -1.38 | 0.23 | y (r) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | 3.41 | 0.51 | y (r) | I | C | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -7.2 | 0.08 | y (m,t,i,r) | I | C | |
| y (0) | y (0) | 2.76 | 0.64 | n | I | C | |
| y (0) | y (0) | 1.43 | 0.53 | n | I | C | |
| y (0) | y (0) | 1.01 | 0.55 | y (m) | I | A | |
| y (0)3 | y (0)3 | -2.614 | 0.335 | y (m)6 | I7 | A8 | |
| 1.57 | 0.81 | n | |||||
| y (0) | y (0) | I | A | ||||
| y (0) | y (0) | -2.09 | 0.49 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -15.56 | 0.19 | y (i) | I | A | |
| y (0) | n (1) | -23.57 | 0.21 | y (i) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -17.57 | 0.11 | y (m,i) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -8.91 | 0.17 | y (m,i) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -17.57 | 0.11 | y (m,i) | I | A | |
| y (0) | n (1) | -25.58 | 0.11 | y (m,i) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -13.95 | 0.23 | y (m) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -5.98 | 0.43 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -9.05 | 0.40 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -2.43 | 0.53 | n | I | C | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -8.82 | 0.49 | n | I | C | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -3.64 | 0.24 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -5.44 | 0.32 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -12.28 | 0.25 | y (i) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -3.53 | 0.28 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -3.53 | 0.28 | n | I | A | |
| y (1) | y (0) | -0.95 | 0.22 | y (m) | I | A/B | |
| y (1) | y (0) | -0.95 | 0.22 | y (m) | I | A/B | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -1.48 | 0.27 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -1.48 | 0.27 | n | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | 0.65 | 0.16 | n (m,t,r) | I | A | |
| y (0) | y (0) | -3.32 | 0.18 | n (m,r) | I | A |
1 From http://www.organic-chemistry.org/prog/peo/. 2 According to Toxtree-v1.60 software [146,147]. mn: micronucleus. 3 y: adjust; n: no adjust; in parenthesis number of violations of the rule. 4 Positive value is for a compound that contains predominatly fragments frequent in commercial drugs. 5 The drug score combines drug-likeness, cLogP, logS, MW and toxicity risks. 6 y: toxic effect, mutagenic (m), tumorigenic (t), irritant (i); reproductive effective (r); n: non toxic effects. 7 Structure alerts for the in vivo micronucleus assay in rodents. I: At least one positive structural alert for the micronucleus assay; II: No alerts for the micronucleus assay. 8 Benigni/Bossa rulebase for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity; A: structural alert for genotoxic carcinogenicity; B: structural alert for nongenotoxic carcinogenicity; C: no alerts for carcinogenic activity; D: potential S. typhimurium TA100 mutagen based on QSAR; E: unlikely to be a S. typhimurium TA100 mutagen based on QSAR; F: potential carcinogen based on QSAR; G: unlikely to be a carcinogen based on QSAR; H: for a better assessment a QSAR calculation could be applied; J: error when applying the decision tree. 9 “-”: no result. 10 Study as E-isomer. The color of the cell refers to: green, good result; yellow, intermedium; rose, bad result.
Figure 65-Nitrofuran and 5-nitrothiophene derivatives without mutagenic effects (Ames test).