| Literature DB >> 27302607 |
Jieon Lee1, Jungho Kim1, Seongchan Kim1, Dal-Hee Min2.
Abstract
Graphene oxide (GO) is one of the most attributed materials for opening new possibilities in the development of next generation biosensors. Due to the coexistence of hydrophobic domain from pristine graphite structure and hydrophilic oxygen containing functional groups, GO exhibits good water dispersibility, biocompatibility, and high affinity for specific biomolecules as well as properties of graphene itself partly depending on preparation methods. These properties of GO provided a lot of opportunities for the development of novel biological sensing platforms, including biosensors based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (LDI-MS), surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and electrochemical detection. In this review, we classify GO-based biological sensors developed so far by their signal generation strategy and provide the comprehensive overview of them. In addition, we offer insights into how the GO attributed in each sensor system and how they improved the sensing performance.Entities:
Keywords: Biomolecule; Biosensor; Electrochemistry; FRET; Graphene oxide; Hybrid nanomaterial; LDI-MS; SERS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27302607 PMCID: PMC7102652 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev ISSN: 0169-409X Impact factor: 15.470
Fig. 1(a) Chemical route to the synthesis of aqueous graphene dispersions. (b) The expected chemical structure of a single sheet of GO. (c) AFM image of the GO on a silicon substrate showing an average thickness of around 1 nm. Adapted and reproduced with permission from (c) Gao et al. [14], Copyright 2009, Nature Publishing Group.
Fig. 2GO-based biological sensors classified depending on the type of the detection signal.
Summary of GO-based biosensors using various detection techniques.
| Detection technique | Characteristics of GO | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| FRET | (1) Strong binding with biomolecules through pi-pi stacking and/or hydrogen bonding interactions, (2) the fluorescence-quenching capability of nearby fluorescent dye | Biomolecule detection |
| LDI-MS | (1) Strong absorbance at the excitation laser wavelength of 337 or 355 nm, (2) high affinity toward various amphiphilic biomolecules (electrostatic/hydrophobic/pi-pi stacking interaction), (3) easy protonation of analytes by functional groups on GO | Biomolecule detection |
| Electrochemistry | (1) Outstanding electrocatalytic ability, (2) low charge-transfer resistance | Biomolecule detection |
| SERS | (1) Quenching the background fluorescence signal, (2) chemical enhancement in SERS induced by electron transfer | Biomolecule detection |
Fig. 3(a) Scheme of the ssDNA target-induced fluorescence change of the DNA probe-FAM-GO complex. (b) Representative snapshots from MD simulation showing that fluorescent dye tagged ssDNA, which is tightly adsorbed at the surface of GO (upper), and dsDNA, which does not adsorb at the surface of GO (bottom). (c) Scheme of the direct detection of dsDNA using PNA and GO. Adapted and reproduced with permission from (a) Lu et al. [47], Copyright 2009, Wiley-VCH;(b) He et al. [48], Copyright 2010, Wiley-VCH;(c) Lee et al. [63], Copyright 2014, Elsevier.
Fig. 4(a) Scheme showing aptamer modification and GO-assisted target capture and analysis. (b) Scheme of LDI-MS based on GO/MWCNT double-layer film-coated substrate and scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of GO/MWCNT film. Adapted and reproduced with permission from (a) Gulbakan et al. [67], Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society, and (b) Kim et al. [75], Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5(a) Differential pulse voltammograms obtained by using GC, graphite/GC, or CR-GO/GC electrodes for all four DNA bases. (b) GO nanoplatelets (GONPs) as electroactive labels for DNA analysis. The hybridization step was performed with complementary target (A), one-mismatch target (B), and noncomplementary target (C). (c) Hybrid GO (GO/popcorn-shaped gold nanoparticle) as ultrasensitive SERS probe for label-free biosensing through both electromagnetic mechanism (EM) and chemical mechanism (CM) enhancement. (d) TEM image of hybrid GO sheet, which binds to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). (e) SERS spectra of MRSA with three kinds of probes. Adapted and reproduced with permission from (a) Zhou et al. [79], Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society, (b) Bonanni et al. [81], Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society, and (c, d) Fan et al. [97], Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society.
Advantages and disadvantages of different signal amplification strategies.
| Amplification strategy | Advantages | Disadvantages | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzymatic amplification | Enzymatic recycling | Fast recycling by high catalytic activity | Requirement of additional cofactors and high cost | 106–115 |
| DNAzyme mediated recycling | Simple components and process | Slow recycling | 118, 119 | |
| Rolling circle amplification | Fast production of repeated sequence | Requirement of large DNA circles at least 100 nt in length | 117 | |
| Enzyme-free amplification | Applicability in in situ imaging | High cost in general | 120–123 | |
Fig. 6(a) Cyclic enzymatic signal amplification method (CEAM) for sensitive miRNA detection. (b) Signal amplification method by using rolling circle amplification (RCA). (c) DNAzyme-based signal amplification for the detection of Pb2 + ion. (d) Enzyme-free signal amplification strategy using hybridization chain reaction (HCR). Adapted and reproduced with permission from (a) Cui et al. [106], Copyright 2012, Royal Society of Chemistry, (b) Liu et al. [117], Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society, (c) [118], Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society, and (d) Yang et al. [120], Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 7(a) GO-based assay for DNA-unwinding helicase activity. (b) Mass spectrometric analysis for lipase activity assay based on GO/MWNT films. (c) Electrochemiluminescence assay based on graphene modified electrode for telomerase activity measurement. Adapted and reproduced with permission from (a) Jang et al. [124], Copyright 2010, Wiley-VCH, (b) Lee et al. [137], Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society, and (c) Wu et al. [140], Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 8(a) PANGO-based multiplex miRNA imaging in cells. (b) GO/MWNT-based tissue imaging using LDI-MS. (c) SERS-based bio-imaging through GO–AuNP hybrid nanostructure. Adapted and reproduced with permission from (a) Ryoo et al. [146], Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society, (b) Kim et al. [75], Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society, and (c) Liu et al. [150], Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.