| Literature DB >> 27136584 |
Min-Shan Lu1, Qiao-Zhu Chen2, Jian-Rong He3, Xue-Ling Wei4, Jin-Hua Lu5, Sheng-Hui Li6, Xing-Xuan Wen7, Fan-Fan Chan8, Nian-Nian Chen9, Lan Qiu10, Wei-Bi Mai11, Rui-Fang Zhang12, Cui-Yue Hu13, Hui-Min Xia14, Xiu Qiu15.
Abstract
There was limited evidence revealing the association of Chinese maternal dietary patterns with fetal growth. We aimed to examine the relationship of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy to neonatal birth weight and birth weight for gestational age in a Chinese population. A total of 6954 mother-child pairs were included from the Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study. Maternal diet during pregnancy was assessed using a self-administered food frequency questionnaire. Cluster analysis was used to identify dietary patterns. The following six dietary patterns were identified: "Cereals, eggs, and Cantonese soups" (n 1026, 14.8%), "Dairy" (n 1020, 14.7%), "Fruits, nuts, and Cantonese desserts" (n 799, 11.5%), "Meats" (n 1066, 15.3%), "Vegetables" (n 1383, 19.9%), and "Varied" (n 1224, 17.6%). The mean neonatal birth weight Z scores of women in the above patterns were 0.02, 0.07, 0.20, 0.01, 0.06, and 0.14, respectively. Women in the "Fruits, nuts, and Cantonese desserts" and "Varied" groups had significantly heavier infants compared with those in the "Cereals, eggs, and Cantonese soups" group. Compared with women in the "Cereals, eggs, and Cantonese soups" group, those in the "Varied" group had marginally significantly lower odds of having a small-for-gestational age (SGA) infant after adjustment for other confounders (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57, 1.04, p = 0.08). These findings suggest that compared to a traditional Cantonese diet high in cereals, eggs, and Cantonese soups, a diet high in fruits, nuts, and Cantonese desserts might be associated with a higher birth weight, while a varied diet might be associated with a greater birth weight and also a decreased risk of having a SGA baby.Entities:
Keywords: China; cluster analysis; dietary patterns; fetal growth; prospective studies
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27136584 PMCID: PMC4882670 DOI: 10.3390/nu8050257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Selection process of study population in the Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study (BIGCS). FFQ refers to food frequency questionnaire.
Comparison of characteristics among women who agreed and disagreed to participate in BIGCS.
| Characteristics | Agreed | Disagreed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 11859 | 3806 | |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 29.0 (3.4) | 28.7 (3.5) | <0.001 |
| Education level, n (%) | |||
| High school or below | 1303 (11.0) | 616 (16.2) | <0.001 |
| College | 3029 (25.5) | 1063 (27.9) | |
| Undergraduate | 6157 (51.9) | 1718 (45.1) | |
| Postgraduate | 1370 (11.6) | 409 (10.8) |
* Significant differences across groups were tested by using t test or chi-square test.
Percentages (%) of weekly intake of 30 food groups assessed with an FFQ questionnaire across the six dietary patterns identified among 6954 pregnant Chinese women from the Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study.
| Food group | Dietary Pattern | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereals, Eggs, and Cantonese Soups | Dairy | Fruits, Nuts, and Cantonese Desserts | Meats | Vegetables | Varied | |||||||
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Rice 1 | 3.9 | 10.9 | 3.4 | 10.2 | 3.4 | 12.7 | 3.2 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 8.2 | 2.8 | |
| Pasta 1 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 2.8 | |
| Noodles 1 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 3.0 | |
| Porridge 1 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 | |
| Bread 1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | |
| Leafy and cruciferous vegetables 1 | 7.9 | 2.9 | 10.6 | 3.3 | 9.2 | 3.5 | 10.5 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 10.1 | 3.0 | |
| Root vegetables 1 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 | |
| Melon vegetables 1 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 | |
| Mushrooms 1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | |
| Sea vegetables 1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |
| Bean vegetables 1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | |
| Processed vegetables 1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |
| Fruits 1 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 8.1 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 7.7 | 2.9 | 7.7 | 2.4 | |
| Red meat 1 | 6.8 | 2.7 | 7.8 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 7.2 | 2.5 | |
| Poultry 1 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 | |
| Animal organ meat 1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | |
| Processed meat 1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | |
| Eggs 1 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 2.8 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 5.4 | 2.3 | |
| Fish 1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | |
| Other seafood 1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | |
| Bean products 1 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 3.6 | |
| Nuts 1 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 2.4 | |
| Dairy 1 | 5.9 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 2.7 | |
| Yoghourt 1 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.2 | |
| Sweet beverages 1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 3.1 | |
| Cantonese desserts 1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.8 | |
| Cantonese soups 1 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | |
| Puffed food 1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |
| Confectioneries 1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | |
| Snack 1 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 | |
1 Percentage values (%), calculated as frequency of the food group intake divided by total frequencies of food intake. The highest mean values are underlined.
Characteristics of the participants across the six dietary patterns identified by cluster analysis among 6954 Chinese pregnant women from the Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study. GDM refers to gestational diabetes mellitus.
| Characteristics | Dietary Pattern | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern 1 | Dairy | Pattern 2 | Meats | Vegetables | Varied | ||
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||
| Age, years, mean ± SD | 28.8 ± 3.3 | 28.9 ± 3.5 | 28.9 ± 3.1 | 29.0 ± 3.3 | 29.2 ± 3.4 | 29.1 ± 3.3 | 0.001 |
| Education level, n (%) | <0.001 | ||||||
| Middle school or below | 97 (9.5) | 99 (9.7) | 75 (9.4) | 73 (6.8) | 127 (9.2) | 101 (6.1) | |
| College | 287 (28.0) | 269 (26.4) | 173 (21.7) | 277 (26) | 356 (25.7) | 320 (19.3) | |
| Undergraduate | 552 (53.8) | 546 (53.5) | 436 (54.6) | 601 (56.4) | 753 (54.4) | 949 (57.2) | |
| Postgraduate or above | 90 (8.8) | 106 (10.4) | 115 (14.4) | 115 (10.8) | 147 (10.6) | 290 (17.5) | |
| Monthly income, Yuan, n (%) | <0.001 | ||||||
| ≤1500 | 86 (8.4) | 99 (9.7) | 86 (10.8) | 96 (9.0) | 137 (9.9) | 148 (8.9) | |
| 1501–4500 | 370 (36.1) | 383 (37.5) | 197 (24.7) | 366 (34.3) | 437 (31.6) | 405 (24.4) | |
| 4501–9000 | 421 (41.0) | 380 (37.3) | 359 (44.9) | 425 (39.9) | 575 (41.6) | 722 (43.5) | |
| >9001 | 135 (13.2) | 130 (12.7) | 135 (16.9) | 156 (14.6) | 204 (14.8) | 344 (20.7) | |
| Refused to answer | 14 (1.4) | 28 (2.7) | 22 (2.8) | 23 (2.2) | 30 (2.2) | 41 (2.5) | |
| Parity, n (%) | <0.001 | ||||||
| Nulliparous | 922 (89.9) | 939 (92.1) | 728 (91.1) | 907 (85.1) | 1155 (83.5) | 1433 (86.3) | |
| Multiparous | 104 (10.1) | 81 (7.9) | 71 (8.9) | 159 (14.9) | 228 (16.5) | 227 (13.7) | |
| Passive smoking during pregnancy, n (%) | 337 (32.8) | 311 (30.5) | 231 (28.9) | 368 (34.5) | 406 (29.4) | 454 (27.3) | 0.001 |
| Alcohol drinking during pregnancy, n (%) | 236 (23.0) | 308 (30.2) | 298 (37.3) | 285 (26.7) | 192 (13.9) | 292 (17.6) | <0.001 |
| Folic acid supplement use, n (%) | 0.109 | ||||||
| No | 91 (8.9) | 89 (8.7) | 60 (7.5) | 99 (9.3) | 116 (8.4) | 121 (7.3) | |
| Started during first 10 weeks | 514 (50.1) | 474 (46.5) | 352 (44.1) | 500 (46.9) | 667 (48.2) | 773 (46.6) | |
| Started pre- conception | 421 (41.0) | 457 (44.8) | 387 (48.4) | 467 (43.8) | 600 (43.4) | 766 (46.1) | |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m2, n (%) | 0.113 | ||||||
| <18.5 | 238 (23.2) | 266 (26.1) | 192 (24.0) | 239 (22.4) | 326 (23.6) | 373 (22.5) | |
| 18.5–23.9 | 695 (67.7) | 635 (62.3) | 535 (67.0) | 694 (65.1) | 895 (64.7) | 1109 (66.8) | |
| ≥24 | 80 (7.8) | 102 (10.0) | 68 (8.5) | 114 (10.7) | 145 (10.5) | 153 (9.2) | |
| Missing | 13 (1.3) | 17 (1.7) | 4 (0.5) | 19 (1.8) | 17 (1.2) | 25 (1.5) | |
| GDM, n (%) | 101 (10.0) | 126 (12.7) | 78 (10.1) | 121 (11.6) | 119 (8.8) | 173 (10.6) | 0.048 |
* ANOVA and Chi square tests were used to test differences between the patterns. 1 “Cereals, eggs, and Cantonese soups”. 2 “Fruits, nuts, and Cantonese desserts”.
Association between dietary patterns and neonatal birth weight Z score.
| Birth Weight z Score | Dietary Pattern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereals, Eggs, and Cantonese Soups | Dairy | Fruits, Nuts, and Cantonese Desserts | Meats | Vegetables | Varied | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| Mean (95% CI) | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.08) a,b | 0.07 (0.01, 0.13) c | 0.20 (0.13,0.26) a,c,d,e | 0.01 (−0.05, 0.07) d,f | 0.06 (0.01, 0.11) e | 0.14 (0.10, 0.19) b,f |
| Crude β (95% CI) | Reference | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.13) | 0.06 (0.09, 0.26) * | 0.01 (−0.09, 0.07) | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.12) | 0.06 (0.05, 0.20) * |
| Adjusted β (95% CI) 1 | Reference | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.13) | 0.05 (0.07, 0.24) * | -0.01 (−0.10, 0.06) | 0.01 (−0.04, 0.11) | 0.04 (0.02, 0.17) * |
| Adjusted β (95% CI) 2 | Reference | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.13) | 0.06 (0.08, 0.26) * | 0.00 (−0.09, 0.07) | 0.02 (−0.03, 0.12) | 0.06 (0.05, 0.20) * |
| Adjusted β (95% CI) 3 | Reference | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.13) | 0.06 (0.09, 0.27) * | -0.01 (−0.10, 0.07) | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.12) | 0.05 (0.05, 0.19) * |
| Adjusted β (95% CI) 4 | Reference | 0.02 (−0.03, 0.13) | 0.05 (0.07, 0.24) * | -0.01 (−0.11, 0.05) | 0.01 (−0.04, 0.11) | 0.04 (0.01, 0.16) * |
a, b, c, d, e, f Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (p < 0·05, Tukey–Kramer’s adjustment for Mixed comparisons in general linear models). * p < 0.05. 1 Adjusted for maternal age, education level, and monthly income. 2 Adjusted for parity, passive smoking during pregnancy, and alcohol drinking during pregnancy. 3 Adjusted for GDM. 4 Adjusted for maternal age, education level, monthly income, parity, passive smoking during pregnancy, alcohol drinking during pregnancy, folic acid supplement use, pre-pregnancy BMI, and GDM.
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of birth weight for gestational age to six dietary patterns identified among 6954 pregnant women from the Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study. SGA refers to small-for-gestational age; LGA refers to large-for-gestational age.
| Birth Weight for Gestational Age | Dietary Pattern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereals, Eggs, and Cantonese Soups | Dairy | Fruits, Nuts, and Cantonese Desserts | Meats | Vegetables | Varied | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| SGA (n, %) | 89 (8.7) | 80 (7.8) | 54 (6.8) | 86 (8.1) | 94 (6.8) | 102 (6.1) |
| Crude OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.90 (0.65-1.23) | 0.76 (0.54-1.08) | 0.92 (0.68-1.26) | 0.77 (0.57-1.04) | 0.69 (0.51-0.93) * |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 1 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.89 (0.65-1.22) | 0.80 (0.56-1.14) | 0.94 (0.69-1.28) | 0.78 (0.58-1.06) | 0.75 (0.56-1.01) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 2 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.90 (0.66-1.23) | 0.77 (0.54-1.09) | 0.92 (0.68-1.26) | 0.77 (0.57-1.04) | 0.69 (0.51-0.93) * |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 3 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.89 (0.65-1.23) | 0.72 (0.50-1.03) | 0.94 (0.69-1.29) | 0.76 (0.56-1.04) | 0.70 (0.52-0.95) * |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 4 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.87 (0.63-1.21) | 0.76 (0.53-1.10) | 0.95 (0.69-1.30) | 0.77 (0.56-1.05) | 0.77 (0.57-1.04) |
| LGA (n, %) | 103 (10.0) | 106 (10.4) | 96 (12.0) | 87 (8.2) | 147 (10.6) | 194 (11.7) |
| Crude OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.04 (0.78-1.38) | 1.22 (0.91-1.64) | 0.80 (0.59-1.07) | 1.07 (0.82-1.39) | 1.19 (0.92-1.53) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 1 | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.03 (0.78-1.38) | 1.17 (0.87-1.57) | 0.78 (0.58-1.06) | 1.04 (0.80-1.36) | 1.11 (0.86-1.43) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 2 | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.03 (0.77-1.37) | 1.21 (0.90-1.62) | 0.79 (0.59-1.07) | 1.08 (0.82-1.41) | 1.19 (0.93-1.54) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 3 | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.04 (0.77-1.36) | 1.22 (0.90-1.64) | 0.77 (0.57-1.04) | 1.06 (0.81-1.38) | 1.17 (0.91-1.51) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) 4 | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.01 (0.75-1.35) | 1.14 (0.84-1.54) | 0.75 (0.56-1.02) | 1.03 (0.79-1.36) | 1.10 (0.85-1.42) |
* p < 0.05. 1 Adjusted for maternal age, education level, and monthly income. 2 Adjusted for parity, passive smoking during pregnancy, and alcohol drinking during pregnancy. 3 Adjusted for GDM. 4 Adjusted for maternal age, education level, monthly income, parity, passive smoking during pregnancy, alcohol drinking during pregnancy, folic acid supplement use, pre-pregnancy BMI, and GDM.