| Literature DB >> 26184308 |
Canqing Yu1, Zumin Shi2, Jun Lv3, Huaidong Du4, Lu Qi5,6, Yu Guo7, Zheng Bian8, Liang Chang9, Xuefeng Tang10, Qilian Jiang11, Huaiyi Mu12, Dongxia Pan13, Junshi Chen14, Zhengming Chen15, Liming Li16,17.
Abstract
Limited evidence exists for the association between diet pattern and obesity phenotypes among Chinese adults. In the present study, we analyzed the cross-sectional data from 474,192 adults aged 30-79 years from the China Kadoorie Biobank baseline survey. Food consumption was collected by an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Three dietary patterns were extracted by factor analysis combined with cluster analysis. After being adjusted for potential confounders, individuals following a traditional southern dietary pattern had the lowest body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC); the Western/new affluence dietary pattern had the highest BMI; and the traditional northern dietary pattern had the highest WC. Compared to the traditional southern dietary pattern in multivariable adjusted logistic models, individuals following a Western/new affluence dietary pattern had a significantly increased risk of general obesity (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.08) and central obesity (PR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08). The corresponding risks for the traditional northern dietary pattern were 1.05 (1.02-1.09) and 1.17 (1.25-1.18), respectively. In addition, the associations were modified by lifestyle behaviors, and the combined effects with alcohol drinking, tobacco smoking, and physical activity were analyzed. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the diet-obesity relationships.Entities:
Keywords: body mass index; central obesity; cross-sectional study; dietary pattern; general obesity; waist circumference
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26184308 PMCID: PMC4517030 DOI: 10.3390/nu7075253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Dietary patterns identified by K-means cluster procedure 1.
| Dietary Patterns | Overall Mean (SD) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Southern Dietary Pattern | Traditional Northern Dietary Pattern | Western/New Affluence Dietary Pattern | |||||
| Food group, day/week | |||||||
| Rice | 7.0 | + + | 1.4 | − − − | 5.6 | = | 5.3 (2.6) |
| Wheat | 1.7 | − − | 7.0 | + + + | 5.0 | + | 3.7 (2.9) |
| Other staple foods | 0.4 | − | 4.0 | + + + | 1.2 | − | 1.4 (2.3) |
| Meat | 3.9 | = | 1.4 | −− | 5.5 | + + | 3.7 (2.5) |
| Poultry | 0.8 | = | 0.1 | − − | 1.4 | + + | 0.8 (1.0) |
| Fish | 1.5 | = | 0.1 | − − | 2.3 | + + | 1.4 (1.6) |
| Eggs | 1.8 | − | 2.4 | = | 4.2 | + + | 2.5 (2.2) |
| Fresh vegetables | 6.9 | = | 6.6 | 7.0 | + | 6.8 (0.8) | |
| Soybean | 1.6 | = | 0.9 | − | 2.6 | + + | 1.7 (1.6) |
| Preserved vegetables | 2.3 | = | 1.5 | − | 2.5 | + | 2.2 (2.4) |
| Fresh fruit | 1.9 | − − | 1.3 | − − | 5.3 | + + + | 2.6 (2.5) |
| Dairy products | 0.2 | − − | 0.4 | − | 3.2 | + + + | 0.9 (2.1) |
| Beverage group, g/week | |||||||
| Beer | 1.2 | = | 0.9 | = | 14.4 | + | 4.1 (33.6) |
| Rice wine | 5.9 | = | <0.1 | = | 1.1 | = | 3.5 (35.3) |
| Wine | <0.1 | = | <0.1 | = | 0.4 | = | 0.1 (3.6) |
| Heavy spirit (≥40%) | 31.1 | = | 10.8 | − | 22.3 | = | 24.3 (113.0) |
| Light spirit (<40%) | 13.9 | = | 6.1 | = | 4.4 | = | 9.9 (68.4) |
| Green tea | 5.8 | = | 3.5 | − | 11.3 | + | 6.5 (15.9) |
| Oolong tea | 0.5 | = | <0.1 | = | 0.6 | = | 0.4 (4.5) |
| Black tea | 1.8 | + | <0.1 | − | 0.2 | − | 1.0 (7.6) |
| Other tea | <0.1 | = | <0.1 | = | <0.1 | = | 0.0 (0.7) |
1 SD, standard deviation; The sign − indicates variation below the mean frequency of intake, while + indicates variation above the mean frequency of intake. For example, we used + (or −) for 0.1–0.49 SD units (SDUs); + + (or − −) for 0.5–0.99 SDUs; and + + + (or − − −) for 1.0–1.99 SDUs; The sign = means equal to mean frequency of intake; For example, for “rice”, the “traditional southern dietary pattern” had a mean intake of 7.0 days/week, which is 0.65 (i.e., (7.0–5.3)/2.6) SDUs above the mean intake, so the corresponding sign (+ +) is used to indicate 0.5–0.99 SDUs above the mean.
Selected characteristics of Chinese adults aged 30–79 according to dietary patterns 1.
| Traditional Southern Dietary Pattern | Traditional Northern Dietary Pattern | Western/New Affluence Dietary Pattern | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 255,758 (53.9) | 110,962 (23.4) | 107,472 (22.7) | |
| Female, % | 59.3 | 59.2 | 58.4 |
| Age, years | 51.7 ± 0.02 | 49.8 ± 0.03 | 50.4 ± 0.03 |
| Urban area, % | 40.1 | 6.8 | 85.2 |
| Southern area, % | 94.2 | 0.7 | 43.6 |
| Married, % | 93.0 | 92.9 | 93.6 |
| High school and above, % | 38.3 | 38.0 | 83.6 |
| Annual household income, % | |||
| <10,000 Yuan RMB | 24.2 | 56.5 | 8.3 |
| 10,000–19,999 Yuan RMB | 27.7 | 33.2 | 27.6 |
| ≥20,000 Yuan RMB | 48.1 | 10.3 | 64.1 |
| Current drinker, % | 8.1 | 3.2 | 10.3 |
| Current smoker, % | 13.3 | 11.4 | 8.8 |
| Physical activity, Met-hour/day | 22.7 ± 0.03 | 23.0 ± 0.04 | 18.9 ± 0.04 |
1 Values are age and sex adjusted percent or mean ± standard error (SE); All values in rows except sex are statistically different, p < 0.05; Met: metabolic equivalent task; Yuan RMB: unit of Chinese money.
Figure 1Age and sex adjusted means of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) by dietary patterns in Chinese adults aged 30–79 years.
Multivariate adjusted prevalence ratios for general and central obesity by dietary patterns in Chinese adults aged 30–79 years 1,2.
| Traditional Southern Dietary Pattern | Traditional Northern Dietary Pattern | Western/New Affluence Dietary Pattern | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General obesity | |||
| No. of cases (%) | 20,512 (8.02) | 12,404 (11.18) | 14,678 (13.66) |
| Crude | 1.00 | 1.39 (1.36–1.42) | 1.70 (1.67–1.74) |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.41 (1.38–1.44) | 1.71 (1.68–1.75) |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.05 (1.01–1.09) | 1.08 (1.05–1.10) |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.05 (1.02–1.09) | 1.06 (1.03–1.08) |
| Central obesity | |||
| No. of cases (%) | 90,783 (35.50) | 47,694 (42.98) | 52,813 (49.14) |
| Crude | 1.00 | 1.21 (1.20–1.22) | 1.38 (1.37–1.40) |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.24 (1.23–1.25) | 1.40 (1.39–1.41) |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.17 (1.16–1.19) | 1.08 (1.07–1.10) |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.17 (1.15–1.18) | 1.07 (1.06–1.08) |
1 Values are prevalence ratios and 95% CIs unless specified. General obesity: BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2, Central obesity: WC ≥ 85 cm for men, ≥80 cm for women; 2 Crude: unadjusted model. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: model 1 + study area, marital status, education level, household income. Model 3: model 2 + alcohol consumption, smoking status, and physical activity.
Joint effect of dietary patterns and lifestyle factors in relation to general obesity and central adiposity among Chinese adults aged 30–79 years 1,2.
| Traditional Southern Dietary Pattern | Traditional Northern Dietary Pattern | Western/New Affluence Dietary Pattern | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General obesity | ||||
| Current drinker | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.04 (1.00–1.08) | 1.03 (1.00–1.06) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 1.06 (1.02–1.10) | 1.19 (1.12–1.28) | 1.28 (1.23–1.34) | |
| Current smoker | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.10 (1.06–1.14) | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 0.69 (0.67–0.72) | 0.56 (0.53–0.60) | 0.92 (0.88–0.96) | |
| Physical activity | ||||
| T1 | 1.00 | 1.28 (1.23–1.33) | 1.20 (1.16–1.24) | <0.001 |
| T2 | 0.93 (0.90–0.96) | 0.98 (0.93–1.03) | 0.95 (0.91–0.98) | |
| T3 | 0.85 (0.82–0.87) | 0.59 (0.56–0.62) | 0.78 (0.74–0.81) | |
| Central adiposity | ||||
| Current drinker | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.11 (1.10–1.13) | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 1.03 (1.01–1.04) | 1.19 (1.16–1.22) | 1.24 (1.22–1.26) | |
| Current smoker | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.19 (1.18–1.21) | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 0.81 (0.80–0.82) | 0.84 (0.82–0.86) | 1.07 (1.05–1.09) | |
| Physical activity | ||||
| T1 | 1.00 | 1.16 (1.14–1.17) | 1.10 (1.09–1.11) | <0.001 |
| T2 | 0.92 (0.90–0.93) | 1.11 (1.09–1.13) | 0.95 (0.94–0.97) | |
| T3 | 0.82 (0.81–0.83) | 0.98 (0.96–1.00) | 0.87 (0.85–0.88) |
1 General obesity: Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 28 kg/m2; Central obesity: Waist circumference (WC) ≥ 85 cm for men, ≥80 cm for women; Physical activity was categorized into tertiles, T1: <12.29 metabolic equivalent task (MET-) hours/day, T2: 12.29–25.30 MET-hours/day, T3: ≥25.31 MET-hours/day; 2 Values are presented as prevalence ratios (95% CI) adjusted for age, sex, study area, marital status, education level, household income, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and physical activity.