| Literature DB >> 29511239 |
Maria Fotiou1, Charalambos Fotakis2, Foteini Tsakoumaki1, Elpiniki Athanasiadou3, Charikleia Kyrkou1, Aristea Dimitropoulou1, Thalia Tsiaka2, Anastasia Chrysovalantou Chatziioannou4, Kosmas Sarafidis5, George Menexes6, Georgios Theodoridis4, Costas G Biliaderis1, Panagiotis Zoumpoulakis7, Apostolos P Athanasiadis8, Alexandra-Maria Michaelidou9.
Abstract
Maternal diet may influence offspring's health, even within well-nourished populations. Amniotic fluid (AF) provides a rational compartment for studies on fetal metabolism. Evidence in animal models indicates that maternal diet affects AF metabolic profile; however, data from human studies are scarce. Therefore, we have explored whether AF content may be influenced by maternal diet, using a validated food-frequency questionnaire and implementing NMR-based metabolomics. Sixty-five AF specimens, from women undergoing second-trimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis, were analysed. Complementary, maternal serum and urine samples were profiled. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified 2 dietary patterns, cluster 1 (C1, n = 33) and cluster 2 (C2, n = 32). C1 was characterized by significantly higher percentages of energy derived from refined cereals, yellow cheese, red meat, poultry, and "ready-to-eat" foods, while C2 by higher (P < 0.05) whole cereals, vegetables, fruits, legumes, and nuts. 1H NMR spectra allowed the identification of metabolites associated with these dietary patterns; glucose, alanine, tyrosine, valine, citrate, cis-acotinate, and formate were the key discriminatory metabolites elevated in C1 AF specimens. This is the first evidence to suggest that the composition of AF is influenced by maternal habitual dietary patterns. Our results highlight the need to broaden the knowledge on the importance of maternal nutrition during pregnancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29511239 PMCID: PMC5840288 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22230-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow diagram of the study.
Percentages of energy contribution of food groups between the two dietary clusters, cluster 1 (C1) and cluster 2 (C2). P-value < 0.05 represents significant differences in mean values according to the results of t-test or Mann-Whitney test indicated by †. SD: standard deviation.
| Food group | Energy contribution | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 (n = 33) Mean ± SD | C2 (n = 32) Mean ± SD | P-value* | |
| Refined cereals | 13 ± 6 | 3.9 ± 4.0 | <0.001 |
| Whole cereals | 2.1 ± 3.3 | 6.6 ± 4.8 | <0.001† |
| Pasta | 6.7 ± 2.8 | 5.5 ± 2.5 | 0.082 |
| Rice | 4.5 ± 2.4 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 0.595 |
| Vegetables | 11 ± 4 | 16 ± 4 | <0.001 |
| Fruits | 6.3 ± 3.8 | 9.7 ± 4.6 | 0.002 |
| Dairy (milk/yogurt) low fat | 2.5 ± 3.3 | 4.0 ± 4.8 | 0.296† |
| Dairy (milk/yogurt) full fat | 4.9 ± 6.0 | 2.6 ± 3.8 | 0.129† |
| Feta cheese | 5.1 ± 3.3 | 6.0 ± 3.9 | 0.305 |
| Yellow cheese | 3.3 ± 2.5 | 2.1 ± 2.3 | 0.049 |
| Red meat | 8.4 ± 3.9 | 6.6 ± 3.0 | 0.019 |
| Poultry | 3.2 ± 1.8 | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 0.011 |
| High fat processed meat | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.117† |
| Low fat processed meat | 0.4 ± 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 0.501† |
| Eggs | 0.9 ± 1.1 | 0.9 ± 0.9 | 0.999† |
| Fish | 2.1 ± 1.5 | 2.2 ± 1.6 | 0.715 |
| Legumes | 2.7 ± 2.0 | 4.1 ± 2.7 | 0.029 |
| Nuts | 0.7 ± 1.4 | 4.2 ± 3.9 | <0.001† |
| Sweets | 8.4 ± 5.0 | 7.5 ± 5.1 | 0.467 |
| “Ready-to-eat” foods | 2.2 ± 1.9 | 1.3 ± 1.1 | 0.035 |
Nutritional profile (energy, macro- and micro- nutrient intakes, dietary indices) of the two dietary clusters, cluster 1 (C1) and cluster 2 (C2). *P-value < 0.05 represents significant differences in mean values according to the results of t-test. SD: standard deviation; SFA: Saturated fatty acids; MUFA: Monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acids.
| C1 (n = 33) Mean ± SD | C2 (n = 32) Mean ± SD | P-value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal) | 1775 ± 289 | 1810 ± 283 | 0.622 |
| % Energy from total protein | 16 ± 2 | 14 ± 2 | 0.001 |
| % Energy from plant protein | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 0.011 |
| % Energy from animal protein | 11 ± 2 | 8.9 ± 1.6 | <0.001 |
| % Energy from total lipids | 45 ± 4 | 46 ± 4 | 0.058 |
| % Energy from MUFA | 22 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 | 0.003 |
| % Energy from PUFA | 5.6 ± 0.8 | 6.7 ± 1.5 | <0.001 |
| % Energy from SFA | 14 ± 2 | 13 ± 2 | 0.015 |
| % Energy from carbohydrates | 38 ± 4 | 37 ± 4 | 0.516 |
| Fibre (g) | 14 ± 4 | 20 ± 4 | <0.001 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 240 ± 78 | 210 ± 58 | 0.086 |
| Folate (mcg) | 172 ± 50 | 235 ± 47 | <0.001 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 84 ± 42 | 124 ± 60 | 0.002 |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 12 ± 5 | 17 ± 6 | <0.001 |
| Calcium (mg) | 909 ± 222 | 887 ± 300 | 0.732 |
| Magnesium (mg) | 206 ± 40 | 259 ± 63 | <0.001 |
| Potassium (mg) | 2068 ± 446 | 2448 ± 532 | 0.003 |
| Sodium (mg) | 2073 ± 380 | 1886 ± 489 | 0.089 |
| Iron heme (mg) | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.025 |
| Iron non heme (mg) | 6.2 ± 1.7 | 7.1 ± 1.5 | 0.028 |
| Dietary Glycaemic Index | 76 ± 6 | 71 ± 7 | 0.004 |
| Dietary Glycaemic Load | 128 ± 35 | 119 ± 24 | 0.216 |
| Time since last meal (hour) | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 0.520 |
Demographic/anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the 65 participants and their offspring for the two dietary clusters, cluster 1 (C1) and cluster 2 (C2). *P-value < 0.05 represents significant differences in mean values according to the results of t-test. SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index.
| Characteristics | C1 (n = 33) Mean ± SD | C2 (n = 32) Mean ± SD | P-value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (year) | 36 ± 5 | 37 ± 4 | 0.332 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 25.8 ± 6.6 | 24.2 ± 4.9 | 0.274 |
| Women weight change until amniocentesis (kg) | 3.8 ± 4.4 | 4.8 ± 2.5 | 0.265 |
| Amniocentesis age (week) | 19 ± 2 | 19 ± 1 | 0.751 |
| Estimated fetal weight (g) | 300 ± 100 | 301 ± 99 | 0.996 |
| Gestational age at birth (week) | 38 ± 1 | 39 ± 2 | 0.769 |
| Birthweight (g) | 3129 ± 424 | 3144 ± 642 | 0.914 |
| Neonatal length (cm) | 50.2 ± 2.1 | 49.7 ± 2.2 | 0.385 |
| Birth weight centile | 42 ± 23 | 41 ± 27 | 0.946 |
| Ponderal index (100*g/cm3) | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 0.076 |
Figure 21H NMR spectra of amniotic fluid sample with annotation on the identified metabolites. 1:valine; 2:leucine; 3:isoleucine; 4:isobutyrate; 5:2-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate; 6:2-hydroxybutyrate; 7:lactate; 8:3-hydroxybutyrate; 9:alanine; 10:lysine; 11:arginine; 12:acetate; 13:acetone; 14:acetoacetate; 15:glutamine; 16:glutamate; 17:citrate; 18:methylamine; 19:aspartate; 20:dimethylamine; 21:creatine; 22:creatinine; 23:choline; 24:phosphocholine; 25:betaine; 26:methanol; 27:α-D-glucose; 28:β-D-glucose; 29:glycine; 30:glycerol; 31:myo-inositol; 32:threonine; 33:tyrosine; 34:histidine; 35:phenylalanine; 36:formate.
Figure 3PCA model of amniotic fluid samples. A = 5; N = 58; R2(cum) = 0.82; Q2(cum) = 0.70. Cluster 1 (C1) Cluster 2 (C2).
Figure 4(a) OPLS-DA model of amniotic fluid samples. A = 1 + 1; N = 54; R2X(cum) = 0.66; R2Y(cum) = 0.76; Q2(cum) = 0.64. Cluster 1 (C1) Cluster 2 (C2). (b) S-Line plot (1:valine; 2:alanine; 3:acetate; 4:citrate; 5:glutamine; 6:cis-acotinate; 7:glucose; 8:tyrosine; 9:formate, higher in C1).
List of metabolite changes in amniotic fluid, maternal urine, and maternal serum corresponding to the two dietary clusters, cluster 1 (C1) and cluster 2 (C2). δ (1H shift) ppm corresponds to signals used for integration; s: singlet; d: doublet; t: triplet; dd: doublet of doublets; m: multiplet; AUROC: Area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic.
| Substrate | Metabolites | δ (1H shift) ppm | Assignment | Multi-plicity | AUROC | Higher in cluster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amniotic fluid | glucose | 5.18, 4.55, 3.4–4.0 | various, H1 | d, d, m | >0.7 | C1 |
| alanine | 1.42 | CH3 | d | >0.7 | C1 | |
| glutamine | 2.44 | half γ-CH2 | m | <0.5 | C1 | |
| tyrosine | 6.8, 7.13 | CH, CH | d, d | >0.7 | C1 | |
| valine | 0.94, 1.03 | CH3, CH3 | d, d | >0.7 | C1 | |
| acetate | 1.87 | CH3 | s | <0.5 | C1 | |
| citrate | 2.53, 2.63 | half CH2, half CH2 | d, d | >0.7 | C1 | |
| 3.45 | CH2 | d | >0.7 | C1 | ||
| formate | 8.4 | CH | s | >0.7 | C1 | |
| histidine | 7.03, 7.84 | H4, H2 | s, s | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| mannose | 5.18 | H6 | d | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| phenylalanine | 7.22, 7.33 | H2 + H6, H3 + H5 | m, m | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| 1-methyl-histidine | 7.07, 7.80 | 4-CH, 2-CH | s, s | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| fumarate | 6.81 | CH3 | s | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| hippurate | 7.59, 7.87 | H3/H5, H2/H6 | t, d | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| Maternal urine | alanine | 1.42 | CH3 | d | >0.7 | C1 |
| glutamine | 2.44 | half γ-CH2 | m | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| isoleucine | 0.95, 1.04 | δ-CH3, β-CH3 | t, d | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| leucine | 0.95 | δ-CH3 | d | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| lysine | 1.66–1.88 | δ-CH2, β-CH2 | m, m | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| valine | 0.94, 1.03 | CH3, CH3 | d, d | >0.7 | C1 | |
| citrate | 2.53, 2.63 | half CH2, half CH2 | d, d | >0.7 | C1 | |
| formate | 8.4 | CH | s | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| isobutyrate | 1.05, 2.41 | CH3, CH | d, dd | >0.7 | C1 | |
| methyl-succinate | 1.08 | CH3 | d | <0.5 | C1 | |
| pyroglutamate | 2.39 | CH2 | m | <0.5 | C1 | |
| 2-hydroxyisobutyrate | 1.36 | CH3 | s | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| 2-hydroxyglutarate | 2.42 | CH2 | t | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| 3-hydroxyisovalerate | 1.26 | CH3 | s | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| betaine | 3.21 | CH3 | s | >0.7 | C1 | |
| choline | 3.14 | N(CH3)3 | s | >0.7 | C1 | |
| dimethylglycine | 2.93 | CH3 | s | >0.7 | C1 | |
| creatine | 2.98 | CH3 | s | >0.7 | C1 | |
| creatinine | 3 | CH3 | s | >0.7 | C1 | |
| trimethylamine N-oxide | 3.19 | CH3 | s | >0.7 | C1 | |
| urea | 5.78 | NH2 + NH2 | m | 0.5–0.7 | C1 | |
| bile acids | 0.6–0.7 | — | m | <0.5 | C1 | |
| imidazole | 7.27 | CH | s | <0.5 | C1 | |
| Maternal serum | cholesterol-VLDL | 0.7 | C18-CH3 | m | 0.5–0.7 | C2 |
| LDL1/VLDL1 | 0.74–0.85 | CH3(CH2)n/ CH3CH2CH2C= | m | >0.7 | C2 | |
| LDL2/VLDL2 | 1.16–1.25 | (CH2)n/CH2CH2CH2CO | m | >0.7 | C2 | |
| lipids mainly VLDL | 1.88 | CH=CHCH2 | m | 0.5–0.7 | C2 | |
| lipids | 2.24 | CH2CO | m | >0.7 | C2 | |
| lipids | 3.17 | C=CCH2C=C | m | >0.7 | C2 | |
| polyunsaturated fatty acids | 5.34–5.44 | CH=CHCH2CH=CH, =CHCH2CH2 | m | >0.7 | C2 |
Figure 5Schematic diagram illustrating the metabolic pathways that are possibly influenced by maternal habitual diet: (a) energy metabolism, amino acids metabolism, and urea cycle; (b) fumarate generation during purine biosynthesis; (c) choline metabolism.