| Literature DB >> 25821944 |
Jian-Rong He1, Ming-Yang Yuan1, Nian-Nian Chen1, Jin-Hua Lu1, Cui-Yue Hu1, Wei-Bi Mai2, Rui-Fang Zhang2, Yong-Hong Pan2, Lan Qiu1, Ying-Fang Wu1, Wan-Qing Xiao1, Yu Liu1, Hui-Min Xia1, Xiu Qiu1.
Abstract
Few studies have explored the relationship between dietary patterns and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Evidence from non-Western areas is particularly lacking. In the present study, we aimed to examine the associations between dietary patterns and the risk of GDM in a Chinese population. A total of 3063 pregnant Chinese women from an ongoing prospective cohort study were included. Data on dietary intake were collected using a FFQ at 24-27 weeks of gestation. GDM was diagnosed using a 75 g, 2 h oral glucose tolerance test. Dietary patterns were determined by principal components factor analysis. A log-binomial regression model was used to examine the associations between dietary pattern and the risk of GDM. The analysis identified four dietary patterns: vegetable pattern; protein-rich pattern; prudent pattern; sweets and seafood pattern. Multivariate analysis showed that the highest tertile of the vegetable pattern was associated with a decreased risk of GDM (relative risk (RR) 0·79, 95% CI 0·64, 0·97), compared with the lowest tertile, whereas the highest tertile of the sweets and seafood pattern was associated with an increased risk of GDM (RR 1·23, 95% CI 1·02, 1·49). No significant association was found for either the protein-rich or the prudent pattern. The protective effect of a high vegetable pattern score was more evident among women who had a family history of diabetes (P for interaction=0·022). These findings suggest that the vegetable pattern was associated with a decreased risk of GDM, while the sweets and seafood pattern was associated with an increased risk of GDM. These findings may be useful in dietary counselling during pregnancy.Entities:
Keywords: China
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25821944 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515000707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Nutr ISSN: 0007-1145 Impact factor: 3.718