Literature DB >> 32108865

Machine learning as a strategy to account for dietary synergy: an illustration based on dietary intake and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Lisa M Bodnar1,2,3, Abigail R Cartus1, Sharon I Kirkpatrick4, Katherine P Himes2,3, Edward H Kennedy5, Hyagriv N Simhan2,3, William A Grobman6, Jennifer Y Duffy7, Robert M Silver8, Samuel Parry9, Ashley I Naimi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional analytic approaches for studying diet patterns assume no dietary synergy, which can lead to bias if incorrectly modeled. Machine learning algorithms can overcome these limitations.
OBJECTIVES: We estimated associations between fruit and vegetable intake relative to total energy intake and adverse pregnancy outcomes using targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) paired with the ensemble machine learning algorithm Super Learner, and compared these with results generated from multivariable logistic regression.
METHODS: We used data from 7572 women in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be. Usual daily periconceptional intake of total fruits and total vegetables was estimated from an FFQ. We calculated the marginal risk of preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth, gestational diabetes, and pre-eclampsia according to density of fruits and vegetables (cups/1000 kcal) ≥80th percentile compared with <80th percentile using multivariable logistic regression and Super Learner with TMLE. Models were adjusted for confounders, including other Healthy Eating Index-2010 components.
RESULTS: Using logistic regression, higher fruit and high vegetable densities were associated with 1.1% and 1.4% reductions in pre-eclampsia risk compared with lower densities, respectively. They were not associated with the 3 other outcomes. Using Super Learner with TMLE, high fruit and vegetable densities were associated with fewer cases of preterm birth (-4.0; 95% CI: -4.9, -3.0 and -3.7; 95% CI: -5.0, -2.3), SGA (-1.7; 95% CI: -2.9, -0.51 and -3.8; 95% CI: -5.0, -2.5), and pre-eclampsia (-3.2; 95% CI: -4.2, -2.2 and -4.0; 95% CI: -5.2, -2.7) per 100 births, respectively, and high vegetable densities were associated with a 0.9% increase in risk of gestational diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in results between Super Learner with TMLE and logistic regression suggest that dietary synergy, which is accounted for in machine learning, may play a role in pregnancy outcomes. This innovative methodology for analyzing dietary data has the potential to advance the study of diet patterns.
Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth; dietary patterns; machine learning; pregnancy; pregnant women; synergy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32108865      PMCID: PMC7266693          DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   8.472


  50 in total

1.  The scientific report guiding the US dietary guidelines: is it scientific?

Authors:  Nina Teicholz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses.

Authors:  David Zeevi; Tal Korem; Niv Zmora; David Israeli; Daphna Rothschild; Adina Weinberger; Orly Ben-Yacov; Dar Lador; Tali Avnit-Sagi; Maya Lotan-Pompan; Jotham Suez; Jemal Ali Mahdi; Elad Matot; Gal Malka; Noa Kosower; Michal Rein; Gili Zilberman-Schapira; Lenka Dohnalová; Meirav Pevsner-Fischer; Rony Bikovsky; Zamir Halpern; Eran Elinav; Eran Segal
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension: a summary of study results. DASH Collaborative Research Group.

Authors:  D W Harsha; P H Lin; E Obarzanek; N M Karanja; T J Moore; B Caballero
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1999-08

4.  Dietary patterns before and during pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramkripa Raghavan; Carol Dreibelbis; Brittany L Kingshipp; Yat Ping Wong; Barbara Abrams; Alison D Gernand; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Jamie Stang; Kellie O Casavale; Joanne M Spahn; Eve E Stoody
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Second-Order Inference for the Mean of a Variable Missing at Random.

Authors:  Iván Díaz; Marco Carone; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Megan S Schuler; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Katherine Ballestros; Michelle Echko; Scott Glenn; Helen E Olsen; Erin Mullany; Alex Lee; Abdur Rahman Khan; Alireza Ahmadi; Alize J Ferrari; Amir Kasaeian; Andrea Werdecker; Austin Carter; Ben Zipkin; Benn Sartorius; Berrin Serdar; Bryan L Sykes; Chris Troeger; Christina Fitzmaurice; Colin D Rehm; Damian Santomauro; Daniel Kim; Danny Colombara; David C Schwebel; Derrick Tsoi; Dhaval Kolte; Elaine Nsoesie; Emma Nichols; Eyal Oren; Fiona J Charlson; George C Patton; Gregory A Roth; H Dean Hosgood; Harvey A Whiteford; Hmwe Kyu; Holly E Erskine; Hsiang Huang; Ira Martopullo; Jasvinder A Singh; Jean B Nachega; Juan R Sanabria; Kaja Abbas; Kanyin Ong; Karen Tabb; Kristopher J Krohn; Leslie Cornaby; Louisa Degenhardt; Mark Moses; Maryam Farvid; Max Griswold; Michael Criqui; Michelle Bell; Minh Nguyen; Mitch Wallin; Mojde Mirarefin; Mostafa Qorbani; Mustafa Younis; Nancy Fullman; Patrick Liu; Paul Briant; Philimon Gona; Rasmus Havmoller; Ricky Leung; Ruth Kimokoti; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; Simon I Hay; Simon Yadgir; Stan Biryukov; Stein Emil Vollset; Tahiya Alam; Tahvi Frank; Talha Farid; Ted Miller; Theo Vos; Till Bärnighausen; Tsegaye Telwelde Gebrehiwot; Yuichiro Yano; Ziyad Al-Aly; Alem Mehari; Alexis Handal; Amit Kandel; Ben Anderson; Brian Biroscak; Dariush Mozaffarian; E Ray Dorsey; Eric L Ding; Eun-Kee Park; Gregory Wagner; Guoqing Hu; Honglei Chen; Jacob E Sunshine; Jagdish Khubchandani; Janet Leasher; Janni Leung; Joshua Salomon; Jurgen Unutzer; Leah Cahill; Leslie Cooper; Masako Horino; Michael Brauer; Nicholas Breitborde; Peter Hotez; Roman Topor-Madry; Samir Soneji; Saverio Stranges; Spencer James; Stephen Amrock; Sudha Jayaraman; Tejas Patel; Tomi Akinyemiju; Vegard Skirbekk; Yohannes Kinfu; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Jost B Jonas; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A diet history questionnaire ranks nutrient intakes in middle-aged and older men and women similarly to multiple food records.

Authors:  J A Mares-Perlman; B E Klein; R Klein; L L Ritter; M R Fisher; J L Freudenheim
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Accurately Inferring Compliance to Five Major Food Guidelines Through Simplified Surveys: Applying Data Mining to the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey.

Authors:  Nicholas Rosso; Philippe Giabbanelli
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2018-05-30

10.  Maternal Dietary Patterns and Fetal Growth: A Large Prospective Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Min-Shan Lu; Qiao-Zhu Chen; Jian-Rong He; Xue-Ling Wei; Jin-Hua Lu; Sheng-Hui Li; Xing-Xuan Wen; Fan-Fan Chan; Nian-Nian Chen; Lan Qiu; Wei-Bi Mai; Rui-Fang Zhang; Cui-Yue Hu; Hui-Min Xia; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.717

View more
  11 in total

1.  Machine learning can improve the development of evidence-based dietary guidelines.

Authors:  Lisa M Bodnar; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Ashley I Naimi
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.539

Review 2.  Prospects and Pitfalls of Machine Learning in Nutritional Epidemiology.

Authors:  Stefania Russo; Stefano Bonassi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Perspective: Big Data and Machine Learning Could Help Advance Nutritional Epidemiology.

Authors:  Jason D Morgenstern; Laura C Rosella; Andrew P Costa; Russell J de Souza; Laura N Anderson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  The effect of different methods to identify, and scenarios used to address energy intake misestimation on dietary patterns derived by cluster analysis.

Authors:  Geraldine Lo Siou; Alianu K Akawung; Nathan M Solbak; Kathryn L McDonald; Ala Al Rajabi; Heather K Whelan; Sharon I Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Incremental Propensity Score Effects for Time-fixed Exposures.

Authors:  Ashley I Naimi; Jacqueline E Rudolph; Edward H Kennedy; Abigail Cartus; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; David M Haas; Hyagriv Simhan; Lisa M Bodnar
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 6.  Could Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and Inclusion of Diet-Gut Microbiome Interactions Improve Disease Risk Prediction? Case Study: Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Baiba Vilne; Juris Ķibilds; Inese Siksna; Ilva Lazda; Olga Valciņa; Angelika Krūmiņa
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.064

7.  Population health science as a unifying foundation for translational clinical and public health research.

Authors:  Mark R Cullen; Michael Baiocchi; Lisa Chamberlain; Isabella Chu; Ralph I Horwitz; Michelle Mello; Amy O'Hara; Sam Roosz
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-03-01

8.  Joint Associations of Food Groups with All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in the Mr. OS and Ms. OS Study: A Prospective Cohort.

Authors:  Jingli Yang; Aimin Yang; Suey Yeung; Jean Woo; Kenneth Lo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 9.  The Age of Artificial Intelligence: Use of Digital Technology in Clinical Nutrition.

Authors:  Berkeley N Limketkai; Kasuen Mauldin; Natalie Manitius; Laleh Jalilian; Bradley R Salonen
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2021-06-08

Review 10.  A scoping review on the use of machine learning in research on social determinants of health: Trends and research prospects.

Authors:  Shiho Kino; Yu-Tien Hsu; Koichiro Shiba; Yung-Shin Chien; Carol Mita; Ichiro Kawachi; Adel Daoud
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.