Literature DB >> 26723337

Effect of multi-electrode configuration on sensitivity to interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Alan Kan1, Heath G Jones1, Ruth Y Litovsky1.   

Abstract

Recent psychophysical studies in bilateral cochlear implant users have shown that interaural timing difference (ITD) sensitivity with electrical stimulation varies depending on the place of stimulation along the cochlear array. While these studies have measured ITD sensitivity at single electrode places separately, it is important to understand how ITD sensitivity is affected when multiple electrodes are stimulated together because multi-electrode stimulation is required for representation of complex sounds. Multi-electrode stimulation may lead to poorer overall performance due to interference from places with poor ITD sensitivity, or from channel interaction due to electrical current spread. Alternatively, multi-electrode stimulation might result in overall good sensitivity if listeners can extract the most reliable ITD cues available. ITD just noticeable differences (JNDs) were measured for different multi-electrode configurations. Results showed that multi-electrode ITD JNDs were poorer than ITD JNDs for the best single-electrode pair. However, presenting ITD information along the whole array appeared to produce better sensitivity compared with restricting stimulation to the ends of the array, where ITD JNDs were comparable to the poorest single-electrode pair. These findings suggest that presenting ITDs in one cochlear region only may not be optimal for maximizing ITD sensitivity in multi-electrode stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723337      PMCID: PMC4691256          DOI: 10.1121/1.4937754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of speak-type cochlear implant signal processors.

Authors:  P C Loizou; M F Dorman; Z Tu; J Fitzke
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  The combination of interaural information across frequencies: lateralization on the basis of interaural delay.

Authors:  R H Dye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Yang-Soo Yoon; Daniel J Freed; Andrew J Vermiglio; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of source spectrum on sound localization in an everyday reverberant room.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Erica Ehlers; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Zheng; Shelly P Godar; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lateralization of interaural timing differences with multi-electrode stimulation in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Mixed stimulation rates to improve sensitivity of interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Relationship Between Intensity Coding and Binaural Sensitivity in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Evaluating the Impact of Age, Acoustic Exposure, and Electrical Stimulation on Binaural Sensitivity in Adult Bilateral Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.