Literature DB >> 28618809

Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.

Erica Ehlers1, Matthew J Goupell2, Yi Zheng3, Shelly P Godar1, Ruth Y Litovsky1.   

Abstract

Children who are deaf and receive bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) perform better on spatial hearing tasks using bilateral rather than unilateral inputs; however, they underperform relative to normal-hearing (NH) peers. This gap in performance is multi-factorial, including the inability of speech processors to reliably deliver binaural cues. Although much is known regarding binaural sensitivity of adults with BiCIs, less is known about how the development of binaural sensitivity in children with BiCIs compared to NH children. Sixteen children (ages 9-17 years) were tested using synchronized research processors. Interaural time differences and interaural level differences (ITDs and ILDs, respectively) were presented to pairs of pitch-matched electrodes. Stimuli were 300-ms, 100-pulses-per-second, constant-amplitude pulse trains. In the first and second experiments, discrimination of interaural cues (either ITDs or ILDs) was measured using a two-interval left/right task. In the third experiment, subjects reported the perceived intracranial position of ITDs and ILDs in a lateralization task. All children demonstrated sensitivity to ILDs, possibly due to monaural level cues. Children who were born deaf had weak or absent sensitivity to ITDs; in contrast, ITD sensitivity was noted in children with previous exposure to acoustic hearing. Therefore, factors such as auditory deprivation, in particular, lack of early exposure to consistent timing differences between the ears, may delay the maturation of binaural circuits and cause insensitivity to binaural differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28618809      PMCID: PMC5464955          DOI: 10.1121/1.4983824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  64 in total

1.  Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons.

Authors:  Christoph Kapfer; Armin H Seidl; Hermann Schweizer; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Models of the electrically stimulated binaural system: A review.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Network       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.273

7.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency.

Authors:  W A Yost; R H Dye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural detection at high frequencies with time-delayed waveforms.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Difference in precedence effect between children and adults signifies development of sound localization abilities in complex listening tasks.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Shelly P Godar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Training-induced plasticity of auditory localization in adult mammals.

Authors:  Oliver Kacelnik; Fernando R Nodal; Carl H Parsons; Andrew J King
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Jack H Noble; Sandeep A Phatak; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth K Jensen; Michael Hoa; Hung Jeffrey Kim; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.619

3.  Microsecond interaural time difference discrimination restored by cochlear implants after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl; Alexa N Buck; Kongyan Li; Jan Wh Schnupp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Kenneth K Jensen; Stefano Cosentino; Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Improving Speech Recognition in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users by Listening With the Better Ear.

Authors:  Alan Kan
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Evaluating the Impact of Age, Acoustic Exposure, and Electrical Stimulation on Binaural Sensitivity in Adult Bilateral Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-26

7.  Consistent and chronic cochlear implant use partially reverses cortical effects of single sided deafness in children.

Authors:  Hyo-Jeong Lee; Daniel Smieja; Melissa Jane Polonenko; Sharon Lynn Cushing; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sound source localization patterns and bilateral cochlear implants: Age at onset of deafness effects.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Rachael Jocewicz; Alan Kan; Jun Zhu; ShengLi Tzeng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Auditory Attention and Spatial Unmasking in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Matthew J Goupell; Emily A Burg; Rachael Jocewicz; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.