Literature DB >> 20329812

The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users.

Justin M Aronoff1, Yang-Soo Yoon, Daniel J Freed, Andrew J Vermiglio, Ivan Pal, Sigfrid D Soli.   

Abstract

While considerable evidence suggests that bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users' sound localization abilities rely primarily on interaural level difference (ILD) cues, and only secondarily, if at all, on interaural time difference (ITD) cues, this evidence has largely been indirect. This study used head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) to independently manipulate ITD and ILD cues and directly measure their contribution to bilateral CI users' localization abilities. The results revealed a strong reliance on ILD cues, but some CI users also made use of ITD cues. The results also suggest a complex interaction between ITD and ILD cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329812      PMCID: PMC2833183          DOI: 10.1121/1.3298451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+cochlear implant system.

Authors:  F Schoen; J Mueller; J Helms; P Nopp
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; Todd A Ricketts; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bernhard U Seeber; Hugo Fastl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jenny C Y Chan; Daniel J Freed; Andrew J Vermiglio; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.117

  8 in total
  52 in total

1.  Effect of multi-electrode configuration on sensitivity to interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlear implant patients' localization using interaural level differences exceeds that of untrained normal hearing listeners.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Daniel J Freed; Laurel M Fisher; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effect of interleaved filters on normal hearing listeners' perception of binaural cues.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Akiko Amano-Kusumoto; Motokuni Itoh; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Julia Stelmach; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.