Literature DB >> 19640045

Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Becky B Poon1, Donald K Eddington, Victor Noel, H Steven Colburn.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) in constant-amplitude pulse trains was measured in four sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant (CI) subjects. The sensitivity measurements were made as a function of time beginning directly after the second ear was implanted, continued for periods of months before subjects began wearing bilateral sound processors, and extended for months while the subjects used bilateral sound processors in day-to-day listening. Measurements were also made as a function of the relative position of the left/right electrodes. The two subjects with the shortest duration of binaural deprivation before implantation demonstrated ITD sensitivity soon after second-ear implantation (before receiving the second sound processor), while the other two did not demonstrate sensitivity until after months of daily experience using bilateral processors. The interaural mismatch in electrode position required to decrease ITD sensitivity by a factor of 2 (half-width) for CI subjects was five times greater than the half-width for interaural carrier-frequency disparity in normal-hearing subjects listening to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated high-frequency tones. This large half-width is likely to contribute to poor binaural performance in CI users, especially in environments with multiple broadband sound sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640045      PMCID: PMC2730718          DOI: 10.1121/1.3158821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat.

Authors:  T C Yin; J C Chan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acuity of sound localisation: a topography of auditory space. III. Monaural hearing conditions.

Authors:  S R Oldfield; S P Parker
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some considerations on the use of adaptive methods for estimating interaural-delay thresholds.

Authors:  K Saberi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient.

Authors:  M Pelizzone; A Kasper; P Montandon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization.

Authors:  R S Tyler; A Q Summerfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; Y C Tong; R D Hollow; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  58 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Precedence based speech segregation in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Vahid Montazeri; Peter F Assmann; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of multi-electrode configuration on sensitivity to interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Review of recent work on spatial hearing skills in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-05

6.  The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Yang-Soo Yoon; Daniel J Freed; Andrew J Vermiglio; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlear implant patients' localization using interaural level differences exceeds that of untrained normal hearing listeners.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Daniel J Freed; Laurel M Fisher; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of interleaved filters on normal hearing listeners' perception of binaural cues.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Akiko Amano-Kusumoto; Motokuni Itoh; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Keng Moua; Shelly Godar; Alan Kan; Sara M Misurelli; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Daniel H Lee; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.