Literature DB >> 26508498

A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty.

Marion Opperer1, Yuo-yu Lee1, Francisco Nally1, Alvaro Blanes Perez1, Kaveh Goudarz-Mehdikhani1, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In order to diminish total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation rate, surgeons strive to achieve adequate component orientation, offset and limb length. In addition, dislocation rate can theoretically be reduced by increasing head diameter and by choosing implants with favorable head-to-neck and cup-to head ratios. We assessed nine radiographic and implant-related parameters associated with an increased risk of dislocation in patients who sustained a dislocation and in those with a stable arthroplasty.
METHODS: A total of 1,487 consecutive elective primary THAs performed by a single surgeon, using a posterolateral approach were reviewed at an average follow-up of 18 months (range, 1-112). Fixation was hybrid in 85 % of hips and non-cemented in 15 %. Thirty-eight patients (38 hips, 2.5 %) sustained at least one dislocation. Thirty-seven patients with good quality, standardized anteroposterior radiographs were selected as a "study group". The study group was matched-paired (1:3) with patients who had a stable arthroplasty based on gender, age, BMI, diagnosis and follow-up. Variables compared between the groups included: head size, cup size, head-to-neck ratio, cup-to-head ratio, leg-length discrepancy, offset, cup inclination, cup version and cup orientation based on the safe zone defined by Lewinnek et al.
RESULTS: None of the nine parameters showed a statistically significant difference between the groups. DISCUSSION: In this study, 90 % of patients who developed a dislocation had properly positioned acetabular components. In addition, the vast majority of patients in the study group had adequate restoration of limb length and offset. The results of our study may be useful for the orthopedic surgeons who discuss instability following THA surgery, particularly in patients with radiographically sound reconstructions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dislocation; Radiographic analysis; Total hip replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26508498     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3022-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  34 in total

1.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Douglas E Padgett; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Constrained liners in revision total hip arthroplasty: an overuse syndrome: in the affirmative.

Authors:  Kevin B Fricka; Amanda Marshall; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  U Hedlundh; L Ahnfelt; C H Hybbinette; L Wallinder; J Weckström; H Fredin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?

Authors:  Benjamin Craiovan; Tobias Renkawitz; Markus Weber; Joachim Grifka; Lutz Nolte; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Arthur L Malkani; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Steven M Kurtz; Benjamin J Justice; Michael T Manley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Cup size and risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robin Peter; Anne Lübbeke; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Marius von Knoch; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head.

Authors:  Einar Amlie; Øystein Høvik; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-05-27
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Ruo-Xiu Xiao; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

2.  The focally constrained liner is a reasonable option for revision of unstable total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tatu J Mäkinen; Simcha G Fichman; Wael A Rahman; Tomas Amenabar; Oleg Safir; Allan E Gross; Paul R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Can we trust combined anteversion and Lewinnek safe zone to avoid hip prosthesis dislocation?

Authors:  Alejandro Hernández; Kushal Lakhani; Jorge H Núñez; Iñaki Mimendia; Aleix Pons; Víctor Barro
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-08-08

4.  Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted.

Authors:  Aonnicha Burapachaisri; Ameer Elbuluk; Edem Abotsi; Jim Pierrepont; Seth A Jerabek; Aaron J Buckland; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-26

Review 5.  Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kurt G Seagrave; Anders Troelsen; Henrik Malchau; Henrik Husted; Kirill Gromov
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Impact of Acetabular Implant Design on Aseptic Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gloria Coden; Chelsea Matzko; Shazaan Hushmendy; William Macaulay; Matthew Hepinstall
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Identification of risk factors for treatment failure of closed reduction and abduction bracing after first-time total hip arthroplasty dislocation.

Authors:  Viktor Janz; Georgi I Wassilew; Michael Putzier; Geraldine Kath; Carsten F Perka
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  The Anterior Lateral Decubitus Intermuscolar and the Postero-Lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Niccoli; Federico Bozzi; Dario Candura; Luca Damiani; Loris Perticarini; Giovanni Li Bassi; Flavio Terragnoli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-10

9.  Measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion via CT generated 3D pelvic model.

Authors:  R Y Wang; W H Xu; X C Kong; L Yang; S H Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.