Literature DB >> 32175423

Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.

Jing-Xin Zhao1,2, Xiu-Yun Su1,3, Zhe Zhao4, Ruo-Xiu Xiao5, Li-Cheng Zhang1,2, Pei-Fu Tang1,2.   

Abstract

Optimal acetabular cup orientation is of substantial importance to good long-term function and low complication rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The radiographic anteversion (RA) and inclination (RI) angles of the cup are typically studied due to the practicability, simplicity, and ease of interpretation of their measurements. A great number of methods have been developed to date, most of which have been performed on pelvic or hip anteroposterior radiographs. However, there are primarily two influencing factors for these methods: X-ray offset and pelvic rotation. In addition, there are three types of pelvic rotations about the transverse, longitudinal, and anteroposterior axes of the body. Their effects on the RA and RI angles of the cup are interactively correlated with the position and true orientation of the cup. To date, various fitted or analytical models have been established to disclose the correlations between the X-ray offset and pelvic rotation and the RA and RI angles of the cup. Most of these models do not incorporate all the potential influencing parameters. Advanced methods for performing X-ray offset and pelvic rotation corrections are mainly performed on a single pelvic AP radiograph, two synchronized radiographs, or a two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2D-3D) registration system. Some measurement systems, originally developed for evaluating implant migration or wear, could also be used for correcting the X-ray offset and pelvic rotation simultaneously, but some drawbacks still exist with these systems. Above all, the 2D-3D registration technique might be an alternative and powerful tool for accurately measuring cup orientation. In addition to the current methods used for postoperative assessment, navigation systems and augmented reality are also used for the preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance of cup placement. With the continuing development of artificial intelligence and machine learning, these techniques could be incorporated into robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery in the future. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular cup; X-ray offset; pelvic rotation; radiographic angle

Year:  2020        PMID: 32175423      PMCID: PMC7049040          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  139 in total

1.  Radiostereometric analysis using clinical radiographic views: Validation measuring total hip replacement wear.

Authors:  Xunhua Yuan; Kimberley Lam Tin Cheung; James L Howard; Brent A Lanting; Matthew G Teeter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Intraoperative measurement of cup inclination using fluoroscopy requires a correction factor.

Authors:  Kilian Rueckl; Diego J Alcaide; Bernhard Springer; Stefan Rueckl; Maximilian F Kasparek; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  A more reliable method to assess acetabular component position.

Authors:  John V Tiberi; Nicholas Pulos; Michael Kertzner; Thomas P Schmalzried; Thomas P Schmlazried
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A mathematical method for precisely calculating the radiographic angles of the cup after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Ruo-Xiu Xiao; Zhe Zhao; Li-Hai Zhang; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs.

Authors:  T Nomura; M Naito; Y Nakamura; T Ida; D Kuroda; T Kobayashi; T Sakamoto; H Seo
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Prosthetic hip angulation.

Authors:  R H McLaren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sarwar S Mahmood; Bariq Al-Amiry; Sebastian S Mukka; Saida Baea; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  A new method for measuring angles after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the acetabular cup and femoral component.

Authors:  J D Visser; J G Konings
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981

9.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience.

Authors:  Paul A Grützner; Guoyan Zheng; Ulrich Langlotz; Jan von Recum; Lutz P Nolte; Andreas Wentzensen; Karl-Heinz Widmer; Klaus Wendl
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in orthopedic surgery: evolution, current state and future directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Kurmis; Jamie R Ianunzio
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-03-02

2.  Letter to the Editor: The Effect of Postural Pelvic Dynamics on the Three-dimensional Orientation of the Acetabular Cup in THA Is Patient Specific.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Patient-specific total hip arthroplasty is superior to conventional methods for Crowe III and IV adult developmental hip dysplasia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chenggong Wang; Yusheng Li; Yihe Hu; Hua Liu; Long Wang; Jie Xie; Han Xiao; Shilong Su; Fawei Gao; Da Zhong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

4.  Radiographic results on acetabular cup placement with the SuperPath technique: a retrospective study of 756 cases.

Authors:  Agostino Di Maro; Santo Creaco; Mattia Albini; Mahfuz Latiff; Marco Merlo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.