Literature DB >> 16264121

Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Daniel J Berry1, Marius von Knoch, Cathy D Schleck, William S Harmsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that use of a larger femoral head could reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, but only limited clinical data have been presented as proof of this hypothesis.
METHODS: From 1969 to 1999, 21,047 primary total hip arthroplasties with varying femoral head sizes were performed at one institution. Patients routinely were followed at defined intervals and were specifically queried about dislocation. The operative approach was anterolateral in 9155 arthroplasties, posterolateral in 3646, and transtrochanteric in 8246. The femoral head diameter was 22 mm in 8691 of the procedures, 28 mm in 8797, and 32 mm in 3559.
RESULTS: One or more dislocations occurred in 868 of the 21,047 hips. The cumulative risk of first-time dislocation was 2.2% at one year, 3.0% at five years, 3.8% at ten years, and 6.0% at twenty years. The cumulative ten-year rate of dislocation was 3.1% following anterolateral approaches, 3.4% following transtrochanteric approaches, and 6.9% following posterolateral approaches. The cumulative ten-year rate of dislocation was 3.8% for 22-mm-diameter femoral heads, 3.0% for 28-mm heads, and 2.4% for 32-mm heads in hips treated with an anterolateral approach; 3.5% for 22-mm heads, 3.5% for 28-mm heads, and 2.8% for 32-mm heads in hips treated with a transtrochanteric approach; and 12.1% for 22-mm heads, 6.9% for 28-mm heads, and 3.8% for 32-mm heads in hips treated with a posterolateral approach. Multivariate analysis showed the relative risk of dislocation to be 1.7 for 22-mm compared with 32-mm heads and 1.3 for 28-mm compared with 32-mm heads.
CONCLUSIONS: In total hip arthroplasty, a larger femoral head diameter was associated with a lower long-term cumulative risk of dislocation. The femoral head diameter had an effect in association with all operative approaches, but the effect was greatest in association with the posterolateral approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264121     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  126 in total

1.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Eric R Bohm; Martin J Petrak; Craig J Della Valle; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Total hip replacement for the treatment of acute femoral neck fractures: results from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales at 3-5 years after surgery.

Authors:  G H Stafford; S C Charman; M J Borroff; C Newell; J K Tucker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Surgical technique: a simple soft-tissue-only repair of the capsule and external rotators in posterior-approach THA.

Authors:  James A Browne; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Orlando J Franchi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marion Opperer; Yuo-yu Lee; Francisco Nally; Alvaro Blanes Perez; Kaveh Goudarz-Mehdikhani; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Kengo Yamamoto; Takashi Atsumi; Satoshi Tamaoki; Kazuhiro Oinuma; Hideaki Shiratsuchi; Hirohiko Tokunaga; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Masaharu Aihara; Kenji Ohzono
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-10

7.  Which is the best alternative for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly?: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongwei Gao; Zhonghao Liu; Deguo Xing; Mingzhi Gong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanobu Hirata; Mio Akiyama; Takashi Itokawa; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Nationwide multicenter follow-up cohort study of hip arthroplasties performed for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Seneki Kobayashi; Toshikazu Kubo; Yukihide Iwamoto; Wakaba Fukushima; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Can patients return to high-impact physical activities after hip resurfacing? A prospective study.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Bruno Miletic; Anthony Deny; Henri Migaud; Nicolas Fouilleron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.