Literature DB >> 26695773

The focally constrained liner is a reasonable option for revision of unstable total hip arthroplasty.

Tatu J Mäkinen1, Simcha G Fichman2, Wael A Rahman2, Tomas Amenabar2, Oleg Safir2, Allan E Gross2, Paul R T Kuzyk2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Revision surgery for a patient with previous recurrent dislocations or abductor muscle dysfunction has been considered to be a complication-prone procedure regardless of the type of constrained implant used. We investigated the survivorship of a focally constrained acetabular liner used for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with abductor insufficiency or previous recurrent dislocations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 98 patients in whom a focally constrained acetabular liner was used to treat abductor insufficiency or previous recurrent dislocations. The mean age was 69.4 years (37-92) and 64 of these were females. Previously, the patients had undergone a mean of two (1-5) revisions. The mean follow-up was 38 (12-66) months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and Log-rank test was used to test the difference in survivorship between patients with abductor insufficiency and previous dislocations.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients needed a further re-revision for any cause. Thus, the revision-free survivorship was 84.3 % at five years. Five patients suffered a dislocation with a mean of five months post-operatively and were managed with repeat revision. Five patients failed at the implant-host bone interface. Three of these failures occurred after cementing the constrained liner into a pre-existing shell.
CONCLUSIONS: The focally constrained liner provided a reasonable option for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip instability. Failures were observed in patients with acetabular osteolysis but seemingly well-fixed component and unrecognized impingement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abductor insufficiency; Constrained liner; Dislocation; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26695773     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3082-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  28 in total

1.  The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Gary S Shapiro; Daniel E Weiland; David C Markel; Douglas E Padgett; Thomas P Sculco; Paul M Pellicci
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen; David G Lewallen; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Can Dual Mobility Cups prevent Dislocation in All Situations After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Julien Wegrzyn; Eloïse Tebaa; Alexandre Jacquel; Jean-Paul Carret; Jacques Béjui-Hugues; Vincent Pibarot
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Large diameter femoral heads: is bigger always better?

Authors:  H J Cooper; C J Della Valle
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Constrained acetabular components.

Authors:  M J Anderson; W R Murray; H B Skinner
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Preliminary report on the S-ROM constraining acetabular insert: a retrospective clinical experience.

Authors:  A V Lombardi; T H Mallory; T J Kraus; B K Vaughn
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Acetabular liner with focal constraint to prevent dislocation after THA.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Mihai H Vioreanu; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up.

Authors:  Brett R Levine; Craig J Della Valle; Carl A Deirmengian; Kristoffer M Breien; Steven H Weeden; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The use of dual-mobility components in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Tyler Steven Watters
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Dislocation after the first and multiple revision total hip arthroplasty: comparison between acetabulum-only, femur-only and both component revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Michael Drexler; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Dror Lakstein; Alex Safir; Raja Chakravertty; Tim Dwyer; Allan Gross
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.