Temel Kaya Yasar1, Mathilde Wagner1, Octavia Bane1, Cecilia Besa1,2, James S Babb3, Stephan Kannengiesser4, Maggie Fung5, Richard L Ehman6, Bachir Taouli1,2. 1. Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, New York, USA. 4. Siemens Medical Solutions, MR Applications Development, Erlangen, Germany. 5. GE Healthcare, MR Applications & Workflow, New York, New York, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess interplatform reproducibility of liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) measured with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) based on a 2D gradient echo (GRE) sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant and Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study involved 12 subjects (five healthy volunteers and seven patients with liver disease). A multislice 2D-GRE-based MRE sequence was performed using two systems from different vendors (3.0T GE and 1.5T Siemens) on the same day. Two independent observers measured LS and SS on confidence maps. Bland-Altman analysis (with coefficient of reproducibility, CR), coefficient of variability (CV), and intraclass correlation (ICC) were used to analyze interplatform, intra- and interobserver variability. Human data were validated using a gelatin-based phantom. RESULTS: There was excellent reproducibility of phantom stiffness measurement (CV 4.4%). Mean LS values were 3.44-3.48 kPa and 3.62-3.63 kPa, and mean SS values were 7.54-7.91 kPa and 8.40-8.85 kPa at 3.0T and 1.5T for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The mean CVs between platforms were 9.2%-11.5% and 13.1%-14.4% for LS and SS, respectively, for observers 1 and 2. There was excellent interplatform reproducibility (ICC >0.88 and CR <36.2%) for both LS and SS, and excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (intraobserver: ICC >0.99, CV <2.1%, CR <6.6%; interobserver: ICC >0.97, CV and CR <16%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that 2D-GRE MRE provides platform- and observer-independent LS and SS measurements.
PURPOSE: To assess interplatform reproducibility of liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) measured with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) based on a 2D gradient echo (GRE) sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant and Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study involved 12 subjects (five healthy volunteers and seven patients with liver disease). A multislice 2D-GRE-based MRE sequence was performed using two systems from different vendors (3.0T GE and 1.5T Siemens) on the same day. Two independent observers measured LS and SS on confidence maps. Bland-Altman analysis (with coefficient of reproducibility, CR), coefficient of variability (CV), and intraclass correlation (ICC) were used to analyze interplatform, intra- and interobserver variability. Human data were validated using a gelatin-based phantom. RESULTS: There was excellent reproducibility of phantom stiffness measurement (CV 4.4%). Mean LS values were 3.44-3.48 kPa and 3.62-3.63 kPa, and mean SS values were 7.54-7.91 kPa and 8.40-8.85 kPa at 3.0T and 1.5T for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The mean CVs between platforms were 9.2%-11.5% and 13.1%-14.4% for LS and SS, respectively, for observers 1 and 2. There was excellent interplatform reproducibility (ICC >0.88 and CR <36.2%) for both LS and SS, and excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (intraobserver: ICC >0.99, CV <2.1%, CR <6.6%; interobserver: ICC >0.97, CV and CR <16%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that 2D-GRE MRE provides platform- and observer-independent LS and SS measurements.
Authors: Stacie I Ringleb; Qingshan Chen; David S Lake; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Kai-Nan An Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Katrin Wunder; Susanne Kriener; Fariba Sotoudeh; Swantje Richter; Joerg Bojunga; Eva Herrmann; Thierry Poynard; Christoph F Dietrich; Johannes Vermehren; Stefan Zeuzem; Christoph Sarrazin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Suraj D Serai; Nancy A Obuchowski; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Claude B Sirlin; Frank H Miller; Edward Ashton; Patricia E Cole; Richard L Ehman Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mathilde Wagner; Idoia Corcuera-Solano; Grace Lo; Steven Esses; Joseph Liao; Cecilia Besa; Nelson Chen; Ginu Abraham; Maggie Fung; James S Babb; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ziying Yin; Matthew C Murphy; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Amy S Mauer; Taofic Mounajjed; Terry M Therneau; Heshan Liu; Harmeet Malhi; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hadrien A Dyvorne; Guido H Jajamovich; Octavia Bane; M Isabel Fiel; Hsin Chou; Thomas D Schiano; Douglas Dieterich; James S Babb; Scott L Friedman; Bachir Taouli Journal: Liver Int Date: 2016-02-07 Impact factor: 5.828