Literature DB >> 24650683

Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T.

Yu Shi1, Qiyong Guo2, Fei Xia3, Jiaxing Sun4, Yuying Gao1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and midterm repeatability of liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in healthy subjects at 3.0T. Twenty-two healthy volunteers were enrolled in this prospective study. The stiffness measurements were obtained from three slices with three repeated acquisitions for each slice (session 1) by two independent raters. After a mean period of 7±2days (session 2) and 195±15days (session 3), each subject was scanned again using the same protocol and MR system. The liver stiffness differences were calculated between sessions or raters. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess interrater agreement and intersession agreement. The stiffness differences over the short- and midterm intervals was (-0.004±0.086) kPa for sessions 1-2, lower than (-0.055±0.150) kPa for sessions 1-3 and (-0.051±0.173) kPa for sessions 2-3. The liver stiffness was more repeatable for the short-term interval with the mean overall ICC of 0.96 (sessions 1-2) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-0.98) compared with 0.91 (sessions 1-3) (95% CI: 0.78-0.96) and 0.87 (sessions 2-3) (95% CI: 0.69-0.95) for the midterm intervals. The overall ICC of interrater agreement was excellent at 0.987 (95% CI: 0.983 to 0.990). These results confirm that MRE is a reproducible technique for liver stiffness quantification over short- and midterm intervals up to 6months in a healthy population at 3.0T.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthy volunteers; Liver; MR elastography; Repeatability; Stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24650683     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  13 in total

Review 1.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Paul Manning; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Tanya Wolfson; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Florin Vaida; Meng Yin; Kevin Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-12

3.  MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshimitsu; Toshimichi Mitsufuji; Yoshinobu Shinagawa; Ritsuko Fujimitsu; Ayako Morita; Hiroshi Urakawa; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Koichi Takano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Repeatability of MR Elastography of Liver: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Nancy A Obuchowski; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Claude B Sirlin; Frank H Miller; Edward Ashton; Patricia E Cole; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.

Authors:  Temel Kaya Yasar; Mathilde Wagner; Octavia Bane; Cecilia Besa; James S Babb; Stephan Kannengiesser; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.

Authors:  Mathilde Wagner; Cecilia Besa; Jad Bou Ayache; Temel Kaya Yasar; Octavia Bane; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Evaluation of liver stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography in patients with constrictive pericarditis: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Eric R Fenstad; Bogdan Dzyubak; Jae K Oh; Eric E Williamson; James F Glockner; Phillip M Young; Nandan S Anavekar; Michael D Leise; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B and C by Using Both Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Fei Xia; Qiu-Ju Li; Jia-Hui Li; Bing Yu; Yue Li; He An; Kevin J Glaser; Shengzhen Tao; Richard L Ehman; Qi-Yong Guo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Short- and midterm reproducibility of marrow fat measurements using mDixon imaging in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Guanwu Li; Zheng Xu; Wei Yuan; Shixin Chang; Yongsheng Chen; Horea Calimente; Jiani Hu
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.