Literature DB >> 28530847

Repeatability of MR Elastography of Liver: A Meta-Analysis.

Suraj D Serai1, Nancy A Obuchowski1, Sudhakar K Venkatesh1, Claude B Sirlin1, Frank H Miller1, Edward Ashton1, Patricia E Cole1, Richard L Ehman1.   

Abstract

Purpose To perform a meta-analysis to generate an estimate of the repeatability coefficient (RC) for magnetic resonance (MR) elastography of the liver. Materials and Methods A systematic search of databases was performed for publications on MR elastography during the 10-year period between 2006 and 2015. The identified studies were screened independently and were verified reciprocally by all authors. Two reviewers independently determined the percentage RC and effective sample size from each article. A forest plot was constructed of the percentage RC estimates from the 12 studies. Bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed for the summary percentage RCs. Results Twelve studies comprising 274 patients met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. A flow diagram of studies included according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was prepared for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies included in the meta-analysis fulfilled four or more of the seven categories of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. The estimated summary RC was 22% (95% CI: 16.1%, 28.2%). The three main sources for this heterogeneity were the trained versus untrained operator drawing contours to choose regions of interest, the time between two replicate examinations, and, finally, the field strength of the MR imaging unit. The RC estimates tended to be higher for studies that did not use a well-trained operator, those with 1.5-T field strength imaging units, and those with longer time intervals between examinations. Conclusion The meta-analysis results provide the basis for the following draft longitudinal Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance MR elastography claim: A measured change in hepatic stiffness of 22% or greater, at the same site and with use of the same equipment and acquisition sequence, indicates that a true change in stiffness has occurred with 95% confidence. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28530847      PMCID: PMC5621724          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  36 in total

1.  Effects of postprandial state and mesenteric blood flow on the repeatability of MR elastography in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Catherine D G Hines; Mary J Lindstrom; Adarsh K Varma; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver in healthy Asians: normal liver stiffness quantification and reproducibility assessment.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Gang Wang; Lynette L S Teo; Bertrand W L Ang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Relationship of MR elastography determined liver stiffness with cardiac function after Fontan palliation.

Authors:  Daniel B Wallihan; Daniel J Podberesky; Bradley S Marino; Joshua S Sticka; Suraj Serai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Qiyong Guo; Fei Xia; Jiaxing Sun; Yuying Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.

Authors:  Temel Kaya Yasar; Mathilde Wagner; Octavia Bane; Cecilia Besa; James S Babb; Stephan Kannengiesser; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness.

Authors:  Catherine D G Hines; Thorsten A Bley; Mary J Lindstrom; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  MR elastography of the liver: defining thresholds for detecting viscoelastic changes.

Authors:  Anneloes E Bohte; Philippe Garteiser; Annikki De Niet; Paul F C Groot; Ralph Sinkus; Jaap Stoker; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Anthony P Reeves; Erich P Huang; Xiao-Feng Wang; Andrew J Buckler; Hyun J Grace Kim; Huiman X Barnhart; Edward F Jackson; Maryellen L Giger; Gene Pennello; Alicia Y Toledano; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle J Myers; Dmitry B Goldgof; Daniel P Barboriak; Robert J Gillies; Lawrence H Schwartz; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Quantitative liver MRI combining phase contrast imaging, elastography, and DWI: assessment of reproducibility and postprandial effect at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Guido H Jajamovich; Hadrien Dyvorne; Claudia Donnerhack; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  30 in total

1.  Clinical Utility of an Increase in Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Predicting Fibrosis Progression in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Veeral H Ajmera; Amy Liu; Seema Singh; Georg Yachoa; Matthew Ramey; Meera Bhargava; Ava Zamani; Scarlett Lopez; Neeraj Mangla; Ricki Bettencourt; Emily Rizo; Mark Valasek; Cynthia Behling; Lisa Richards; Claude Sirlin; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Imaging Modalities in Pediatric NAFLD.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Jennifer Panganiban; Manish Dhyani; Andrew J Degnan; Sudha A Anupindi
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance elastography: basic principles, technique, and clinical applications in the liver.

Authors:  Habip Eser Akkaya; Ayşe Erden; Diğdem Kuru Öz; Sena Ünal; İlhan Erden
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) with multiparametric hepatic magnetic resonance imaging and elastography.

Authors:  Ziying Yin; Matthew C Murphy; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Amy S Mauer; Taofic Mounajjed; Terry M Therneau; Heshan Liu; Harmeet Malhi; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Jiahui Li; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-23

6.  Evaluation of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Early-phase Clinical Trials of Steatohepatitis in Adolescents.

Authors:  Nidhi P Goyal; Mary Catherine Sawh; Patricia Ugalde-Nicalo; Jorge E Angeles; James A Proudfoot; Kimberly P Newton; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin; Jeffrey B Schwimmer
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 7.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver.

Authors:  Jiahui Li; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Meng Yin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 9.  Putting it all together: established and emerging MRI techniques for detecting and measuring liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout; Alexander Miethke; Eric Diaz; Stavra A Xanthakos; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.