Literature DB >> 20187219

Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness.

Catherine D G Hines1, Thorsten A Bley, Mary J Lindstrom, Scott B Reeder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the sources of variability of MRE hepatic stiffness measurements using healthy volunteers and patients and to calculate the minimum change required for statistical significance. Hepatic stiffness measured with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has demonstrated tremendous potential as a noninvasive surrogate of hepatic fibrosis, although the underlying repeatability of MRE for longitudinal tracking of liver disease has not been documented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRE stiffness measurements from 20 healthy volunteers and 10 patients were obtained twice on the same day, and repeated 2-4 weeks later for volunteers in this institutional review board-approved study. A linear mixed effects model was used to estimate the component sources of variability in the data.
RESULTS: The standard deviation of MRE measurements of the same individual on different days is 11.9% (percent of the measured stiffness) using the same reader and 12.0% using different readers. The standard deviation of the difference between two measurements (i.e., longitudinal change in an individual) is 17.4%; the corresponding 95% confidence interval for zero change is (-27.0%, 37.0%).
CONCLUSION: MRE is a repeatable method for quantifying liver stiffness. Using the described MRE technique, changes greater than 37.0% of the smaller measured stiffness value represent meaningful changes in longitudinal liver stiffness measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20187219      PMCID: PMC2901399          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  23 in total

1.  Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: preliminary results.

Authors:  S A Kruse; J A Smith; A J Lawrence; M A Dresner; A Manduca; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Reversibility of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis following treatment for hepatitis C.

Authors:  Michael J P Arthur
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance-elastography.

Authors:  R Sinkus; M Tanter; S Catheline; J Lorenzen; C Kuhl; E Sondermann; M Fink
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; D J Lomas; P J Rossman; J F Greenleaf; A Manduca; R L Ehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; R L Ehman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 7.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Farrell; Claire Z Larter
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Assessment of asymptomatic liver fibrosis in alcoholic patients using fibroscan: prospective comparison with seven non-invasive laboratory tests.

Authors:  E Nguyen-Khac; D Chatelain; B Tramier; C Decrombecque; B Robert; J-P Joly; M Brevet; P Grignon; S Lion; L Le Page; J-L Dupas
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Frank Peeters; Ralph Sinkus; Laurence Annet; Najat Salameh; Leon C ter Beek; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Regression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C after therapy with interferon and ribavirin.

Authors:  Asma Arif; Robert A Levine; Schuyler O Sanderson; Leslie Bank; Raja P Velu; Ashok Shah; Thomas C Mahl; Daniel H Gregory
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  58 in total

1.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of the liver: can fat deposition in the liver affect the measurement of liver stiffness?

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Yoshibumi Niitsuma; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

3.  Test-retest repeatability of MR elastography for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C.

Authors:  Norah J Shire; Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Radha A Railkar; Sabrina Fox-Bosetti; Stephanie M Johnson; Chan R Beals; Bernard J Dardzinski; Schuyler O Sanderson; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Paul Manning; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Tanya Wolfson; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Florin Vaida; Meng Yin; Kevin Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-12

5.  MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshimitsu; Toshimichi Mitsufuji; Yoshinobu Shinagawa; Ritsuko Fujimitsu; Ayako Morita; Hiroshi Urakawa; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Koichi Takano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Repeatability of MR Elastography of Liver: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Nancy A Obuchowski; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Claude B Sirlin; Frank H Miller; Edward Ashton; Patricia E Cole; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Morisaka; Utaroh Motosugi; Kevin J Glaser; Shintaro Ichikawa; Richard L Ehman; Katsuhiro Sano; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.