Literature DB >> 28154910

Value of tumor stiffness measured with MR elastography for assessment of response of hepatocellular carcinoma to locoregional therapy.

Sonja Gordic1,2, Jad Bou Ayache3, Paul Kennedy1, Cecilia Besa1, Mathilde Wagner1, Octavia Bane1, Richard L Ehman4, Edward Kim3, Bachir Taouli5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to correlate tumor stiffness (TS) measured with MR elastography (MRE) with degree of tumor enhancement and necrosis on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) treated with Yttrium-90 radioembolization (RE) or transarterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation (TACE/RFA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was IRB-approved and the requirement for informed consent was waived. 52 patients (M/F 38/14, mean age 67 years) with HCC who underwent RE (n = 22) or TACE/RFA (n = 30) and 11 controls (M/F 6/5, mean age 64 years) with newly diagnosed untreated HCC were included. The MRI protocol included a 2D MRE sequence. TS and LS (liver stiffness) were measured on stiffness maps. Degree of tumor necrosis was assessed on subtraction images by two observers, and tumor enhancement ratios (ER) were calculated on CE-T1WI by one observer.
RESULTS: 63 HCCs (mean size 3.2 ± 1.6 cm) were evaluated. TS was significantly lower in treated vs. untreated tumors (3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 6.9 ± 3.4 kPa, p = 0.006) and also compared to LS (5.3 ± 2.2 kPa, p = 0.002). There were significant correlations between TS and each of enhancement ratios (r = 0.514, p = 0.0001), and percentage of necrosis (r = -0.540, p = 0.0001). The observed correlations were stronger in patients treated with RE (TS vs. ER, r = 0.636, TS vs. necrosis, r = -0.711, both p = 0.0001). Percentage of necrosis and T1-signal in native T1WI were significant independent predictors of TS (p = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: TS measured with MRE shows a significant correlation with tumor enhancement and necrosis, especially in HCCs treated with RE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Locoregional therapy; MR elastography; Tumor stiffness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28154910      PMCID: PMC5590631          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1066-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  30 in total

1.  Effects of gadoxetic acid on liver elasticity measurement by using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hironobu Sou; Katsuhiro Sano; Ali Muhi; Richard L Ehman; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Medium-sized (3.1-5.0 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: transarterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation versus radiofrequency ablation alone.

Authors:  Jin Hyoung Kim; Hyung Jin Won; Yong Moon Shin; Sung Hee Kim; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Kyu-Bo Sung; Pyo Nyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.

Authors:  Temel Kaya Yasar; Mathilde Wagner; Octavia Bane; Cecilia Besa; James S Babb; Stephan Kannengiesser; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; R L Ehman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: current treatment strategies.

Authors:  Aaron Shields; K Rajender Reddy
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12

7.  Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in USA.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.288

8.  MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; James F Glockner; Naoki Takahashi; Philip A Araoz; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres.

Authors:  Ahsun Riaz; Laura Kulik; Robert J Lewandowski; Robert K Ryu; Georgia Giakoumis Spear; Mary F Mulcahy; Michael Abecassis; Talia Baker; Vanessa Gates; Ritu Nayar; Frank H Miller; Kent T Sato; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation.

Authors:  Philippe Garteiser; Sabrina Doblas; Jean-Luc Daire; Mathilde Wagner; Helena Leitao; Valérie Vilgrain; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Anna G Sorace; John Virostko; Richard G Abramson; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Pedro Enriquez-Navas; Robert Gillies; John D Hazle; Ralph P Mason; C Chad Quarles; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Junzhong Xu; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Response comparison of PLC and SLC with magnetic resonance elastography after TACE.

Authors:  Y Haas; M P Dosch; T J Vogl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Updates on Imaging of Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Arya Haj-Mirzaian; Ana Kadivar; Ihab R Kamel; Atif Zaheer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography can predict development of hepatocellular carcinoma with longitudinally acquired two-point data.

Authors:  Shintaro Ichikawa; Utaroh Motosugi; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Differential Imaging of Liver Tumors before and after Microwave Ablation with Electrode Displacement Elastography.

Authors:  Robert M Pohlman; James L Hinshaw; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Meghan G Lubner; Shane A Wells; Fred T Lee; Marci L Alexander; Kelly L Wergin; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Riccardo Sartoris; Jules Grégory; Lorenzo Garzelli; Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Ronot; Marco Dioguardi Burgio
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 9.  Recent advances in non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Riccardo Inchingolo; Luigi Grazioli; Silvia Girolama Drago; Michele Nardella; Marco Gatti; Riccardo Faletti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Evaluation of MR elastography as a response parameter for transarterial chemoembolization of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Simon S Martin; Addison A Johnson; Yannick Haas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.