Literature DB >> 28045604

Technical Failure of MR Elastography Examinations of the Liver: Experience from a Large Single-Center Study.

Mathilde Wagner1, Idoia Corcuera-Solano1, Grace Lo1, Steven Esses1, Joseph Liao1, Cecilia Besa1, Nelson Chen1, Ginu Abraham1, Maggie Fung1, James S Babb1, Richard L Ehman1, Bachir Taouli1.   

Abstract

Purpose To assess the determinants of technical failure of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography of the liver in a large single-center study. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Seven hundred eighty-one MR elastography examinations performed in 691 consecutive patients (mean age, 58 years; male patients, 434 [62.8%]) in a single center between June 2013 and August 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. MR elastography was performed at 3.0 T (n = 443) or 1.5 T (n = 338) by using a gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence. MR elastography and anatomic image analysis were performed by two observers. Additional observers measured liver T2* and fat fraction. Technical failure was defined as no pixel value with a confidence index higher than 95% and/or no apparent shear waves imaged. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess potential predictive factors of technical failure of MR elastography. Results The technical failure rate of MR elastography at 1.5 T was 3.5% (12 of 338), while it was higher, 15.3% (68 of 443), at 3.0 T. On the basis of univariate analysis, body mass index, liver iron deposition, massive ascites, use of 3.0 T, presence of cirrhosis, and alcoholic liver disease were all significantly associated with failure of MR elastography (P < .004); but on the basis of multivariable analysis, only body mass index, liver iron deposition, massive ascites, and use of 3.0 T were significantly associated with failure of MR elastography (P < .004). Conclusion The technical failure rate of MR elastography with a gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence was low at 1.5 T but substantially higher at 3.0 T. Massive ascites, iron deposition, and high body mass index were additional independent factors associated with failure of MR elastography of the liver with a two-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28045604      PMCID: PMC5548447          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  37 in total

1.  Effects of gadoxetic acid on liver elasticity measurement by using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hironobu Sou; Katsuhiro Sano; Ali Muhi; Richard L Ehman; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hansjörg Graf; Ulrike A Lauer; Alexander Berger; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Improved T2* assessment in liver iron overload by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Vincenzo Positano; Benedetta Salani; Alessia Pepe; Maria Filomena Santarelli; Daniele De Marchi; Anna Ramazzotti; Brunella Favilli; Eliana Cracolici; Massimo Midiri; Paolo Cianciulli; Massimo Lombardi; Luigi Landini
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.

Authors:  Temel Kaya Yasar; Mathilde Wagner; Octavia Bane; Cecilia Besa; James S Babb; Stephan Kannengiesser; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C.

Authors:  Anneloes E Bohte; Annikki de Niet; Louis Jansen; Shandra Bipat; Aart J Nederveen; Joanne Verheij; Valeska Terpstra; Ralph Sinkus; Karin M J van Nieuwkerk; Rob J de Knegt; Bert C Baak; Peter L M Jansen; Henk W Reesink; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  MR elastography of liver fibrosis: preliminary results comparing spin-echo and echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Najat Salameh; Leon ter Beek; Eric Vicaut; Frank Peeters; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  MR elastography for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: does histologic necroinflammation influence the measurement of hepatic stiffness?

Authors:  Yu Shi; Qiyong Guo; Fei Xia; Bogdan Dzyubak; Kevin J Glaser; Qiuju Li; Jiahui Li; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  43 in total

1.  Frequency of technical success of two-dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography in a large pediatric and young adult cohort: a clinical effectiveness study.

Authors:  Nathan A Northern; Jonathan R Dillman; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-04-04

Review 2.  Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis: a review from the society of abdominal radiology disease focus panel.

Authors:  Jeanne M Horowitz; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Kartik Jhaveri; Patrick Kamath; Michael A Ohliger; Anthony E Samir; Alvin C Silva; Bachir Taouli; Michael S Torbenson; Michael L Wells; Benjamin Yeh; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

3.  The Role of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Alina M Allen; Vijay H Shah; Terry M Therneau; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Taofic Mounajjed; Joseph J Larson; Kristin C Mara; Phillip J Schulte; Todd A Kellogg; Michael L Kendrick; Travis J McKenzie; Suzanne M Greiner; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Michael L Wells; Jun Chen; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 4.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Aaron Fischman; Thomas Schiano; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-14

5.  Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Kevin J Glaser; Anke Bergman; Rodrigo P Luz; Eduardo H de Figueiredo; Flavia Paiva Proença Lobo Lopes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Advances in non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Michelle T Long; Sanil Gandhi; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.694

7.  MR elastography: high rate of technical success in pediatric and young adult patients.

Authors:  Madalsa Joshi; Jonathan R Dillman; Alexander J Towbin; Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03

Review 8.  Noninvasive imaging biomarker assessment of liver fibrosis by elastography in NAFLD.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Multiparametric CT for Noninvasive Staging of Hepatitis C Virus-Related Liver Fibrosis: Correlation With the Histopathologic Fibrosis Score.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Adnan Said; Daniel Jones; Brandon Welsh; Ryan Zea; Meghan G Lubner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Assessment of SE-MRE-derived shear stiffness at 3.0 Tesla for solid liver tumors characterization.

Authors:  Andrés Dominguez; Daniel Fino; Juan Carlos Spina; Nicolas Moyano Brandi; Joaquín Capó; Maximiliano Noceti; Pedro Pablo Ariza; Guilherme Moura Cunha
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.