Literature DB >> 26329469

Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials.

Catharine H Clark1,2, Edwin G A Aird3, Steve Bolton4,5, Elizabeth A Miles3, Andrew Nisbet1,6, Julia A D Snaith2, Russell A S Thomas2, Karen Venables3, David I Thwaites7.   

Abstract

Dosimetry audit plays an important role in the development and safety of radiotherapy. National and large scale audits are able to set, maintain and improve standards, as well as having the potential to identify issues which may cause harm to patients. They can support implementation of complex techniques and can facilitate awareness and understanding of any issues which may exist by benchmarking centres with similar equipment. This review examines the development of dosimetry audit in the UK over the past 30 years, including the involvement of the UK in international audits. A summary of audit results is given, with an overview of methodologies employed and lessons learnt. Recent and forthcoming more complex audits are considered, with a focus on future needs including the arrival of proton therapy in the UK and other advanced techniques such as four-dimensional radiotherapy delivery and verification, stereotactic radiotherapy and MR linear accelerators. The work of the main quality assurance and auditing bodies is discussed, including how they are working together to streamline audit and to ensure that all radiotherapy centres are involved. Undertaking regular external audit motivates centres to modernize and develop techniques and provides assurance, not only that radiotherapy is planned and delivered accurately but also that the patient dose delivered is as prescribed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26329469      PMCID: PMC4743452          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  65 in total

1.  Determination of the accuracy of implant reconstruction and dose delivery in brachytherapy in The Netherlands and Belgium.

Authors:  R J Elfrink; I K Kolkman-Deurloo; H J van Kleffens; A Rijnders; B Schaeken; T H Aalbers; W J Dries; J L Venselaar
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Feasibility study of glass dosimeter postal dosimetry audit of high-energy radiotherapy photon beams.

Authors:  Hideyuki Mizuno; Tatsuaki Kanai; Yohsuke Kusano; Susumu Ko; Mari Ono; Akifumi Fukumura; Kyoko Abe; Kanae Nishizawa; Munefumi Shimbo; Suoh Sakata; Satoshi Ishikura; Hiroshi Ikeda
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Audit on source strength determination for HDR and PDR (192)Ir brachytherapy in Sweden.

Authors:  Asa Carlsson Tedgren; Jan-Erik Grindborg
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: a multi-institution study.

Authors:  Rojano Kashani; Martina Hub; James M Balter; Marc L Kessler; Lei Dong; Lifei Zhang; Lei Xing; Yaoqin Xie; David Hawkes; Julia A Schnabel; Jamie McClelland; Sarang Joshi; Quan Chen; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Polarity and ion recombination correction factors for ionization chambers employed in electron beam dosimetry.

Authors:  A Nisbet; D I Thwaites
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A dosimetric intercomparison of electron beams in UK radiotherapy centres.

Authors:  A Nisbet; D I Thwaites
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A multicentre 'end to end' dosimetry audit for cervix HDR brachytherapy treatment.

Authors:  Antony L Palmer; Patricia Diez; Laura Gandon; Andrea Wynn-Jones; Peter Bownes; Chris Lee; Edwin Aird; Margaret Bidmead; Gerry Lowe; David Bradley; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy?

Authors:  B J Mijnheer; J J Battermann; A Wambersie
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Intercomparison of calibration procedures for Ir-192 HDR sources in The Netherlands and Belgium.

Authors:  J L Venselaar; W F Brouwer; B H van Straaten; A H Aalbers
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Questionnaire based quality assurance for the RT01 trial of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer (ISRCTN 47772397).

Authors:  W Philip M Mayles; A Rollo Moore; Edwin G A Aird; A Margaret Bidmead; David P Dearnaley; Sue E Griffiths; A P Jim Warrington
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  12 in total

1.  Adaptation and validation of a commercial head phantom for cranial radiosurgery dosimetry end-to-end audit.

Authors:  Alexis Dimitriadis; Antony L Palmer; Russell A S Thomas; Andrew Nisbet; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The Design of an Audit Test for 60Co Brachytherapy Treatment Planning System.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi Birgani; Hadis Khorshidsavar; Ali Bagheri; Amir Danyaei; Neda Abdalvand
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans.

Authors:  Christian Rønn Hansen; Anders Bertelsen; Irene Hazell; Ruta Zukauskaite; Niels Gyldenkerne; Jørgen Johansen; Jesper G Eriksen; Carsten Brink
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 4.  Novel methodologies for dosimetry audits: Adapting to advanced radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Marlies Pasler; Victor Hernandez; Núria Jornet; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-19

5.  Dosimetric end-to-end tests in a national audit of 3D conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joerg Lehmann; Andrew Alves; Leon Dunn; Maddison Shaw; John Kenny; Stephanie Keehan; Jeremy Supple; Francis Gibbons; Sophie Manktelow; Chris Oliver; Tomas Kron; Ivan Williams; Jessica Lye
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-24

6.  Evaluation of a generalized knowledge-based planning performance for VMAT irradiation of breast and locoregional lymph nodes-Internal mammary and/or supraclavicular regions.

Authors:  Maria Rago; Lorenzo Placidi; Mattia Polsoni; Giulia Rambaldi; Davide Cusumano; Francesca Greco; Luca Indovina; Sebastiano Menna; Elisa Placidi; Gerardina Stimato; Stefania Teodoli; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Silvia Chiesa; Fabio Marazzi; Valeria Masiello; Vincenzo Valentini; Marco De Spirito; Luigi Azario
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The role of dosimetry audit in achieving high quality radiotherapy.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Núria Jornet; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21

8.  A Mail Audit Independent Peer Review System for Dosimetry Verification of a Small Animal Irradiator.

Authors:  Mary P Gronberg; Ramesh C Tailor; Susan A Smith; Stephen F Kry; David S Followill; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Joshua S Niedzielski; Patricia E Lindsay; Sunil Krishnan; Francisco Aguirre; Tara N Fujimoto; Cullen M Taniguchi; Rebecca M Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  A remote EPID-based dosimetric TPS-planned audit of centers for clinical trials: outcomes and analysis of contributing factors.

Authors:  Narges Miri; Kimberley Legge; Kim Colyvas; Joerg Lehmann; Philip Vial; Alisha Moore; Monica Harris; Peter B Greer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Quantification of the uncertainties within the radiotherapy dosimetry chain and their impact on tumour control.

Authors:  Matthew Bolt; Catharine H Clark; Andrew Nisbet; Tao Chen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.