Literature DB >> 32068498

A Mail Audit Independent Peer Review System for Dosimetry Verification of a Small Animal Irradiator.

Mary P Gronberg1,2, Ramesh C Tailor1,2, Susan A Smith1, Stephen F Kry1,2, David S Followill1,2, Strahinja Stojadinovic3,4, Joshua S Niedzielski1,5, Patricia E Lindsay6,7, Sunil Krishnan8,2, Francisco Aguirre1, Tara N Fujimoto8, Cullen M Taniguchi8,2, Rebecca M Howell1,2.   

Abstract

Dedicated precision orthovoltage small animal irradiators have become widely available in the past decade and are commonly used for radiation biology research. However, there is a lack of dosimetric standardization among these irradiators, which affects the reproducibility of radiation-based animal studies. The purpose of this study was to develop a mail-based, independent peer review system to verify dose delivery among institutions using X-RAD 225Cx irradiators (Precision X-Ray, North Branford, CT). A robust, user-friendly mouse phantom was constructed from high-impact polystyrene and designed with dimensions similar to those of a typical laboratory mouse. The phantom accommodates three thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) to measure dose. The mouse peer review system was commissioned in a small animal irradiator using anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior beams of 225 kVp and then mailed to three institutions to test the feasibility of the audit service. The energy correction factor for TLDs in the mouse phantom was derived to validate the delivered dose using this particular animal irradiation system. This feasibility study indicated that three institutions were able to deliver a radiation dose to the mouse phantom within ±10% of the target dose. The developed mail audit independent peer review system for the verification of mouse dosimetry can be expanded to characterize other commercially available orthovoltage irradiators, thereby enhancing the reproducibility of studies employing these irradiators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32068498      PMCID: PMC8177689          DOI: 10.1667/RR15220.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  19 in total

1.  AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology.

Authors:  C M Ma; C W Coffey; L A DeWerd; C Liu; R Nath; S M Seltzer; J P Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Development and validation of a treatment planning system for small animal radiotherapy: SmART-Plan.

Authors:  Stefan J van Hoof; Patrick V Granton; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Characterization of image quality and image-guidance performance of a preclinical microirradiator.

Authors:  R Clarkson; P E Lindsay; S Ansell; G Wilson; S Jelveh; R P Hill; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Small animal image-guided radiotherapy: status, considerations and potential for translational impact.

Authors:  K T Butterworth; K M Prise; F Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Establishment of postal audit system in intensity-modulated radiotherapy by radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters and a radiochromic film.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okamoto; Toshiyuki Minemura; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Hideyuki Mizuno; Naoki Tohyama; Teiji Nishio; Akihisa Wakita; Satoshi Nakamura; Shie Nishioka; Kotaro Iijima; Daisuke Fujiyama; Jun Itami; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Paola Alvarez; Joanna E Cygler; Larry A DeWerd; Rebecca M Howell; Sanford Meeks; Jennifer O'Daniel; Chester Reft; Gabriel Sawakuchi; Eduardo G Yukihara; Dimitris Mihailidis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Edwin G A Aird; Steve Bolton; Elizabeth A Miles; Andrew Nisbet; Julia A D Snaith; Russell A S Thomas; Karen Venables; David I Thwaites
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service: a commentary on the first 18 months.

Authors:  Ivan Williams; John Kenny; Jessica Lye; Joerg Lehmann; Leon Dunn; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.430

9.  The Importance of Dosimetry Standardization in Radiobiology.

Authors:  Marc Desrosiers; Larry DeWerd; James Deye; Patricia Lindsay; Mark K Murphy; Michael Mitch; Francesca Macchiarini; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Helen Stone
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2013-12-30

Review 10.  Preclinical Data on Efficacy of 10 Drug-Radiation Combinations: Evaluations, Concerns, and Recommendations.

Authors:  Helen B Stone; Eric J Bernhard; C Norman Coleman; James Deye; Jacek Capala; James B Mitchell; J Martin Brown
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.