Literature DB >> 26305750

Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.

Christine Grady1, Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim, Bernie Lo, Rebecca Pentz, Laura Rodriguez, Carol Weil, Benjamin S Wilfond, David Wendler.   

Abstract

Different types of consent are used to obtain human biospecimens for future research. This variation has resulted in confusion regarding what research is permitted, inadvertent constraints on future research, and research proceeding without consent. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center's Department of Bioethics held a workshop to consider the ethical acceptability of addressing these concerns by using broad consent for future research on stored biospecimens. Multiple bioethics scholars, who have written on these issues, discussed the reasons for consent, the range of consent strategies, and gaps in our understanding, and concluded with a proposal for broad initial consent coupled with oversight and, when feasible, ongoing provision of information to donors. This article describes areas of agreement and areas that need more research and dialogue. Given recent proposed changes to the Common Rule, and new guidance regarding storing and sharing data and samples, this is an important and timely topic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Keywords:; biomedical research; informed consent; regulatory issues; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26305750      PMCID: PMC4791589          DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  37 in total

1.  Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Daniel R Morrison; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

Authors:  Donna T Chen; Donald L Rosenstein; Palaniappan Muthappan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Franklin G Miller; Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

Review 3.  Advocacy groups as research organizations: the PXE International example.

Authors:  Sharon F Terry; Patrick F Terry; Katherine A Rauen; Jouni Uitto; Lionel G Bercovitch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Dynamic consent in the digital age of biology: online initiatives and regulatory considerations.

Authors:  Richman Wee; Mark Henaghan; Ingrid Winship
Journal:  J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-12-01

5.  The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994.

Authors:  M J Alter; D Kruszon-Moran; O V Nainan; G M McQuillan; F Gao; L A Moyer; R A Kaslow; H S Margolis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Principles of human subjects protections applied in an opt-out, de-identified biobank.

Authors:  Jill Pulley; Ellen Clayton; Gordon R Bernard; Dan M Roden; Daniel R Masys
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  Phylogenetic relationships of dengue-2 viruses.

Authors:  J A Lewis; G J Chang; R S Lanciotti; R M Kinney; L W Mayer; D W Trent
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Broad versus blanket consent for research with human biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Biobanks containing clinical specimens: defining characteristics, policies, and practices.

Authors:  Teresa Edwards; R Jean Cadigan; James P Evans; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.281

10.  Autoantibodies predate the onset of systemic lupus erythematosus in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Catharina Eriksson; Heidi Kokkonen; Martin Johansson; Göran Hallmans; Göran Wadell; Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  79 in total

1.  From in vivo to in vitro: How the Guatemala STD Experiments Transformed Bodies Into Biospecimens.

Authors:  Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Paul A Lombardo
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Genetic Data, Two-Sided Markets and Dynamic Consent: United States Versus France.

Authors:  Henri-Corto Stoeklé; Mauro Turrini; Philipe Charlier; Jean-François Deleuze; Christian Hervé; Guillaume Vogt
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research.

Authors:  Sarah Gehlert; Jessica Mozersky
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Authorization of tissues from deceased patients for genetic research.

Authors:  Maureen Wilson-Genderson; K Laura Barker; Heather M Gardiner; Maghboeba Mosavel; Jeffrey Thomas; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  An empirical assessment of the short-term impacts of a reading of Deborah Zoe Laufer's drama Informed Consent on attitudes and intentions to participate in genetic research.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Jeffrey R Botkin; Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell; Bob Wong; Gretchen A Case; Erin Johnson; Trent Matheson; Alena Wilson; Nicole R Robinson; Jared Rawlings; Brooke Horejsi; Ana Maria Lopez; Carrie L Byington
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-04-06

6.  Ethical principles for the use of human cellular biotechnologies.

Authors:  Paul Root Wolpe; Karen S Rommelfanger
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Effect of deliberation on the public's attitudes toward consent policies for biobank research.

Authors:  Tom Tomlinson; Raymond G De Vries; H Myra Kim; Linda Gordon; Kerry A Ryan; Chris D Krenz; Scott Jewell; Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.

Authors:  Effy Vayena; Alessandro Blasimme
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Erisa Mwaka; Lyn Horn
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.