Literature DB >> 29652094

From in vivo to in vitro: How the Guatemala STD Experiments Transformed Bodies Into Biospecimens.

Kayte Spector-Bagdady1, Paul A Lombardo2.   

Abstract

Policy Points: While most scholarship regarding the US Public Health Service's STD experiments in Guatemala during the 1940s has focused on the intentional exposure experiments, secondary research was also conducted on biospecimens collected from these subjects. These biospecimen experiments continued after the Guatemala grant ended, and the specimens were used in conjunction with those from the Tuskegee syphilis experiments for ongoing research. We argue there should be a public accounting of whether there are still biospecimens from the Guatemala and Tuskegee experiments held in US government biorepositories today. If such specimens exist, they should be retired from US government research archives because they were collected unethically as understood at the time. CONTEXT: The US Public Health Service's Guatemala STD experiments (1946-1948) included intentional exposure to pathogens and testing of postexposure prophylaxis methods for syphilis, gonorrhea, and chancroid in over 1,300 soldiers, commercial sex workers, prison inmates, and psychiatric patients. Though the experiments had officially ended, the biospecimens collected from these subjects continued to be used for research at least into the 1950s.
METHODS: We analyzed historical documents-including clinical and laboratory records, correspondence, final reports, and medical records-for information relevant to these biospecimen experiments from the US National Archives. In addition, we researched material from past governmental investigations into the Guatemala STD experiments, including those of the US Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues and the Guatemalan Comisión Presidencial para el Esclarecimiento de los Experimentos Practicados con Humanos en Guatemala.
FINDINGS: Identified spinal fluid, blood specimens, and tissue collected during the Guatemala diagnostic methodology and intentional exposure experiments were subsequently distributed to laboratories throughout the United States for use in ongoing research until at least 1957. Five psychiatric patient subjects involved in these biospecimen experiments died soon after experimental exposure to STDs. The same US government researchers working with the Guatemala biospecimens after the exposure experiments ended were also working with specimens taken from the Tuskegee syphilis study.
CONCLUSIONS: There should be a complete public accounting of whether biospecimens from the Guatemala and Tuskegee experiments are held in US government biorepositories today. If they still exist, these specimens should be retired from such biorepositories and their future disposition determined by stakeholders, including representatives from the communities from which they were derived.
© 2018 Milbank Memorial Fund.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common Rule; Guatemala STD experiments; Tuskegee syphilis experiments; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29652094      PMCID: PMC5987804          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  24 in total

1.  Scandal over Nazi victims' corpses rocks universities.

Authors:  Steven Dickman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Inoculation syphilis in human volunteers.

Authors:  H J MAGNUSON; E W THOMAS; S OLANSKY; B I KAPLAN; L DE MELLO; J C CUTLER
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1956-02       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  The echo of Nuremberg: Nazi data and ethics.

Authors:  S G Post
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Presumptive false positive serologic reactions for syphilis in Central America. III. Relation to serum protein, albumin, and globulin.

Authors:  G STOUT; J MENDEZ; M GUZMAN; N S SCRIMSHAW
Journal:  Am J Syph Gonorrhea Vener Dis       Date:  1952-01

5.  Presumptive false positive serologic reactions for syphilis in Central America.

Authors:  G STOUT; M GUZMAN; N S SCRIMSHAW
Journal:  Am J Syph Gonorrhea Vener Dis       Date:  1952-01

6.  When heroes stumble.

Authors:  Paul A Lombardo
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  "Ever vigilant" in "Ethically Impossible": structural injustice and responsibility in PHS research in Guatemala.

Authors:  Charlene Galarneau
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Should the Nazi research data be cited?

Authors:  K Moe
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-01-19

10.  Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Lisa Eckstein; Ben Berkman; Dan Brock; Robert Cook-Deegan; Stephanie M Fullerton; Hank Greely; Mats G Hansson; Sara Hull; Scott Kim; Bernie Lo; Rebecca Pentz; Laura Rodriguez; Carol Weil; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Enhancing African American Participation in Biospecimens: A Case in Point for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Linda Behar-Horenstein; Rueben C Warren; V Wendy Setiawan; Corey Perkins; Thomas D Schmittgen
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2020-12

2.  Increasing Ancestral Diversity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Jessica N Williams; Maria Dall'Era; S Sam Lim; Candace H Feldman; Kathleen A Arntsen; Ashira D Blazer; Tawara Goode; Joan T Merrill; Saira Sheikh; Anne M Stevens; Peter E Lipsky; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.178

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.