W Scott Hoge1, Jonathan R Polimeni2. 1. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to seek improved image quality from accelerated echo planar imaging (EPI) data, particularly at ultrahigh fields. Certain artifacts in EPI reconstructions can be attributed to nonlinear phase differences between data acquired using frequency-encoding gradients of alternating polarity. These errors appear near regions of local susceptibility gradients and typically cannot be corrected with conventional Nyquist ghost correction (NGC) methods. METHODS: We propose a new reconstruction method that integrates ghost correction into the parallel imaging data recovery process. This is achieved through a pair of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) kernels that operate directly on the measured EPI data. The proposed dual-polarity GRAPPA (DPG) method estimates missing k-space data while simultaneously correcting inherent EPI phase errors. RESULTS: Simulation results showed that standard NGC is incapable of correcting higher-order phase errors, whereas the DPG kernel approach successfully removed these errors. The presence of higher-order phase errors near regions of local susceptibility gradients was demonstrated with in vivo data. DPG reconstructions of in vivo 3T and 7T EPI data acquired near these regions showed a marked improvement over conventional methods. CONCLUSION: This new parallel imaging method for reconstructing accelerated EPI data shows better resilience to inherent EPI phase errors, resulting in higher image quality in regions where higher-order EPI phase errors commonly occur. Magn Reson Med 76:32-44, 2016.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to seek improved image quality from accelerated echo planar imaging (EPI) data, particularly at ultrahigh fields. Certain artifacts in EPI reconstructions can be attributed to nonlinear phase differences between data acquired using frequency-encoding gradients of alternating polarity. These errors appear near regions of local susceptibility gradients and typically cannot be corrected with conventional Nyquist ghost correction (NGC) methods. METHODS: We propose a new reconstruction method that integrates ghost correction into the parallel imaging data recovery process. This is achieved through a pair of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) kernels that operate directly on the measured EPI data. The proposed dual-polarity GRAPPA (DPG) method estimates missing k-space data while simultaneously correcting inherent EPI phase errors. RESULTS: Simulation results showed that standard NGC is incapable of correcting higher-order phase errors, whereas the DPG kernel approach successfully removed these errors. The presence of higher-order phase errors near regions of local susceptibility gradients was demonstrated with in vivo data. DPG reconstructions of in vivo 3T and 7T EPI data acquired near these regions showed a marked improvement over conventional methods. CONCLUSION: This new parallel imaging method for reconstructing accelerated EPI data shows better resilience to inherent EPI phase errors, resulting in higher image quality in regions where higher-order EPI phase errors commonly occur. Magn Reson Med 76:32-44, 2016.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Stefan Skare; Rexford D Newbould; David B Clayton; Gregory W Albers; Scott Nagle; Roland Bammer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jonathan R Polimeni; Himanshu Bhat; Thomas Witzel; Thomas Benner; Thorsten Feiweier; Souheil J Inati; Ville Renvall; Keith Heberlein; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Berkin Bilgic; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Mary Kate Manhard; Qiyuan Tian; Congyu Liao; Siddharth S Iyer; Stephen F Cauley; Susie Y Huang; Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jessica A McKay; Steen Moeller; Lei Zhang; Edward J Auerbach; Michael T Nelson; Patrick J Bolan Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Onur Afacan; W Scott Hoge; Tess E Wallace; Ali Gholipour; Sila Kurugol; Simon K Warfield Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Tess E Wallace; Jonathan R Polimeni; Jason P Stockmann; W Scott Hoge; Tobias Kober; Simon K Warfield; Onur Afacan Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Avery J L Berman; William A Grissom; Thomas Witzel; Shahin Nasr; Daniel J Park; Kawin Setsompop; Jonathan R Polimeni Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 4.668