Literature DB >> 22975658

Differences in central corneal thickness between the paired eyes and the severity of the glaucomatous damage.

M Iester1, S Telani, P Frezzotti, G Manni, M Uva, M Figus, A Perdicchi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a difference in central corneal thickness (CCT) between the paired eyes could be associated to worse glaucoma in the thinner cornea eye.
METHODS: From 16 different glaucoma centres, at least 50 glaucomatous patients were saved on the Italian Glaucoma Register. Eight hundred and sixteen glaucomatous patients were found in the register. CCT, ophthalmoscopic cup/disc ratio, mean deviation (MD), pattern SD (PSD), and intraocular pressure (IOP). The difference (Δ) between the paired eyes was calculated for all the considered parameters and two subgroups were created on the basis of ΔCCT. Because the difference between the two eyes could be positive or negative, the absolute value of Δ was considered for all the measurements. Three different ΔCCT cutoffs were selected: 10, 15, and 20 μm. Student's t-test was used to compare the subgroups.
RESULTS: When the entire group was divided in two subgroups using 20 μm as ΔCCT cutoff, no significant difference was found for ΔIOP (-0.38 ± 2.53 (mean ± SD) mm Hg and -0.07 ± 2.35 mm Hg, respectively) between the two subgroups. Significant (P<0.001) difference was found for ΔMD (6.58 ± 7.30 and 3.14 ± 4.22 dB, respectively), ΔPSD (3.92 ± 4.01 and 2.16 ± 2.57, respectively), and ΔC/D (0.11 ± 0.14 and 0.08 ± 0.11, respectively) between the two subgroups. No significant correlation was found between ΔCCT and the other parameters.
CONCLUSION: The ΔCCT between the two eyes could be associated to a worse glaucoma in the thinner cornea eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22975658      PMCID: PMC3496099          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  28 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness and progression of the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D M Hutchison; R P LeBlanc; P H Artes; M T Nicolela
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement.

Authors:  Teruyo Kida; John H K Liu; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Circadian variations in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  P Fogagnolo; L Rossetti; F Mazzolani; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Central corneal thickness correlated with glaucoma damage and rate of progression.

Authors:  Jost B Jonas; Andrea Stroux; Isabel Velten; Anselm Juenemann; Peter Martus; Wido M Budde
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The relationship between central corneal thickness-adjusted intraocular pressure and glaucomatous visual-field loss.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan-Mee; Kathy D Halverson; Glenn B Saxon; Mollie C Saxon; Kathleen M Shafer; Jeffrey A Sterling; Melissa J Sterling; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2005-04

6.  High interocular corneal symmetry in average simulated keratometry, central corneal thickness, and posterior elevation.

Authors:  Elliott H Myrowitz; Anthony C Kouzis; Terrence P O'Brien
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Relationship between asymmetric central corneal thickness and glaucomatous visual field loss within the same patient.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan-Mee; James Matthew Gentry; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Lateral differences indicate future glaucoma.

Authors:  A Thölen; L Tremmel; W Maurer; Y Robert; P Hendrickson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan-Mee; Kathy D Halverson; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage.

Authors:  Nathan G Congdon; Aimee T Broman; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Davinder Grover; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  9 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  David Kuerten; Niklas Plange; Eva Charlotte Koch; Antonis Koutsonas; Peter Walter; Matthias Fuest
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Major review: Molecular genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Yutao Liu; R Rand Allingham
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Decision Trees for Glaucoma Screening Based on the Asymmetry of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Rafael Berenguer-Vidal; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Juan Morales-Sánchez; Inmaculada Sellés-Navarro; Oleksandr Kovalyk; José-Luis Sancho-Gómez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Central corneal thickness measurements in premature infants.

Authors:  Murat Gunay; Gokhan Celik; Betul Onal Gunay; Mahmut Dogru; Tugba Gursoy; Husnu Fahri Ovali
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Repeatability and reproducibility of applanation resonance tonometry: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Laura Ottobelli; Paolo Fogagnolo; Paolo Frezzotti; Stefano De Cillà; Elena Vallenzasca; Maurizio Digiuni; Ruggiero Paderni; Ilaria Motolese; Simone Alex Bagaglia; Eduardo Motolese; Luca Rossetti
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  The Association of Central Corneal Thickness with Ocular and General Parameters in a Community Setting: The Yazd Eye Study.

Authors:  Reza Soleimanizad; Mohammad Hosein Nowroozzadeh; Hossein Ziaei; Mohammad Pakravan; Mehdi Yaseri; Marzieh Katibeh
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

8.  No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Marcelo Ayala; Johanna Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-19

9.  A Comparative Study of Central Corneal Epithelial, Stromal, and Total Thickness in Males With and Without Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Hatim Batawi; Ivonne Valentina Lollett; Cima Maliakal; Sarah R Wellik; Michael G Anderson; William Feuer; Carol L Karp; Anat Galor
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.152

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.