| Literature DB >> 25866795 |
Alexander Christoph Paulus1, Manja Franke1, Michael Kraxenberger1, Christian Schröder1, Volkmar Jansson1, Sandra Utzschneider1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Overlooked polymethylmethacrylate after unicondylar knee arthroplasty can be a potential problem, since this might influence the generated wear particle size and morphology. The aim of this study was the analysis of polyethylene wear in a knee wear simulator for changes in size, morphology, and particle number after the addition of third-bodies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25866795 PMCID: PMC4383432 DOI: 10.1155/2015/575849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Size and shape of third-body particulate debris.
| Parameter | Porcine bone particles | PMMA particles |
|---|---|---|
| Mean diameter ( | 671.6 ± 186.4 | 644.2 ± 262.6 |
| ECD ( | 519.0 ± 142.9 | 548.4 ± 237.3 |
| FF | 0.41 ± 0.12 | 0.57 ± 0.12 |
| AR | 1.74 ± 0.62 | 1.74 ± 0.70 |
| Roundness | 0.50 ± 0.14 | 0.42 ± 0.14 |
Median size and morphology parameters of all analyzed particles.
| Area ( | Roundness | AR | ECD ( | FF | Mean diameter ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone particles | 0.013*
| 0.674*
| 1.337*
| 0.129*
| 0.680*
| 0.144*
|
| PMMA particles | 0.011*
| 0.516*
| 1.509*
| 0.118*
| 0.606*
| 0.130*
|
| Control | 0.012*
| 0.578*
| 1.509*
| 0.124*
| 0.629*
| 0.130*
|
* P < 0.05; in brackets: min.–max.
Figure 1Size distribution measured by the ECD of all groups in a logarithmic box plot. The results of all groups differ significantly (* P < 0.05).
Figure 2The morphology of the particles given by the aspect ratio. The cement debris group tends towards more fibrillar particles. The results of all groups differ significantly (* P < 0.05).
Percentage of particles in the distribution described by Sieving et al. [13].
| Aspect ratio | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1–2.39 (%) | ≥2.4 (%) | |
| Bone particles | 93.65 | 6.35 |
| PMMA particles | 86.58 | 13.42 |
| Control | 90.16 | 9.84 |
Figure 3SEM sample images of all tested groups. (a) and (d) show the debris of the bone debris group; (b) and (e) demonstrate the enormous number of particles in the cement group; (c) and (f) serve as examples for the control group. (a), (b) and (c) are 5000x magnified; (d), (e) and (f) are 10000x magnified.
Figure 4Particle size distribution measured by the ECD for each size interval.
Figure 5The change of the polyethylene wear particle number in the progress of the simulator tests, respectively after the addition of the third-body wear.