Literature DB >> 20190307

Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings.

B J L Kendrick1, D Longino, H Pandit, U Svard, H S Gill, C A F Dodd, D W Murray, A J Price.   

Abstract

The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee replacement (UKR) was introduced as a design to reduce polyethylene wear. There has been one previous retrieval study involving this implant, which reported very low rates of wear in some specimens but abnormal patterns of wear in others. There has been no further investigation of these abnormal patterns. The bearings were retrieved from 47 patients who had received a medial Oxford UKR for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. None had been studied previously. The mean time to revision was 8.4 years (sd 4.1), with 20 having been implanted for over ten years. The macroscopic pattern of polyethylene wear and the linear penetration were recorded for each bearing. The mean rate of linear penetration was 0.07 mm/year. The patterns of wear fell into three categories, each with a different rate of linear penetration; 1) no abnormal macroscopic wear and a normal articular surface, n = 16 (linear penetration rate = 0.01 mm/year); 2) abnormal macroscopic wear and normal articular surfaces with extra-articular impingement, n = 16 (linear penetration rate = 0.05 mm/year); 3) abnormal macroscopic wear and abnormal articular surfaces with intra-articular impingement +/- signs of non-congruous articulation, n = 15 (linear penetration rate = 0.12 mm/year). The differences in linear penetration rate were statistically significant (p < 0.001). These results show that very low rates of polyethylene wear are possible if the device functions normally. However, if the bearing displays suboptimal function (extra-articular, intra-articular impingement or incongruous articulation) the rates of wear increase significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190307     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  31 in total

1.  Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; John P Collier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Andrew Price; Robin Allum
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  The influence of third-body particles on wear rate in unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a wear simulator study with bone and cement debris.

Authors:  Christian Schroeder; Thomas M Grupp; Bernhard Fritz; Christoph Schilling; Yan Chevalier; Sandra Utzschneider; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  [Unicompartimental joint (Oxford III) with mobile bearing : Minimally invasive implantation of a in the medial compartiment].

Authors:  W Petersen; S Metzlaff; P Forkel; A Achtnich; K Schmoranzer; P Hertel
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Relationship of surface damage appearance and volumetric wear in retrieved TKR polyethylene liners.

Authors:  Christopher B Knowlton; Priyanka Bhutani; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.

Authors:  B Kerens; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; P Boog; P J Emans; H Lacroix; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement.

Authors:  H Pandit; F Mancuso; C Jenkins; W F M Jackson; A J Price; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Return to sports, recreational activity and patient-reported outcomes after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tilman Walker; Tobias Gotterbarm; Thomas Bruckner; Christian Merle; Marcus R Streit
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Daoyun Chen; Chen Zhu; Xiaoyun Pan; Xin Mao; Yongyuan Guo; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts.

Authors:  Christopher B Knowlton; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.