Literature DB >> 10984696

Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles.

T R Green1, J Fisher, J B Matthews, M H Stone, E Ingham.   

Abstract

Polyethylene wear debris generated at the bearing surfaces of total artificial hip joints is thought to play an important role in the periprosthetic osteolysis and ultimately the aseptic loosening of these prostheses. The macrophage is believed to be central to this process by releasing various cytokines and other mediators of osteolysis upon phagocytosis of the polyethylene wear debris. This study evaluated the in vitro bone resorption response of C3H murine peritoneal macrophages to clinically relevant GUR 1120 polyethylene particles. Macrophages were co-cultured in vitro with GUR 1120 particles with a mean size of 0.24, 0.45, 1.71, and 7.62, and GUR 1120 polyethylene resin with a mean size of 88 microm at various particle volume (microm)(3): macrophage ratios (0.1:1; 1:1; 10:1; and 100:1). The conditioned supernatants were incubated with (45)calcium radio-labeled mouse calvariae, and bone resorption was measured as (45)calcium release. The results showed that the 0.24 microm particles stimulated the macrophages to generate bone resorbing activity at a ratio of 10(microm)(3) per macrophage. The 0.45 and 1.71 microm particles were active at a ratio of 100( microm)(3) per macrophage, and the 7.62 and 88 microm particles were inactive at all the doses tested. The co-culture supernatants were also assayed for TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, and PGE(2). The results followed the same trend for particle size and volume dose to that observed for the bone resorbing activity. This study has demonstrated, for the first time, the importance of size and dose of clinically relevant polyethylene particles on the osteolytic response of macrophages in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10984696     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(200009)53:5<490::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  72 in total

1.  Quantifying subtle but persistent peri-spine inflammation in vivo to submicron cobalt-chromium alloy particles.

Authors:  Nadim James Hallab; Frank W Chan; Megan L Harper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of particle size and electrical charge on macrophage-osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption.

Authors:  A Sabokbar; R Pandey; N A Athanasou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The John Charnley Award: an accurate and sensitive method to separate, display, and characterize wear debris: part 1: polyethylene particles.

Authors:  Fabrizio Billi; Paul Benya; Aaron Kavanaugh; John Adams; Edward Ebramzadeh; Harry McKellop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Correlating subjective and objective descriptors of ultra high molecular weight wear particles from total joint prostheses.

Authors:  Brian T McMullin; Ming-Ying Leung; Arun S Shanbhag; Donald McNulty; Jay D Mabrey; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  [Wear particles: key to aseptic prosthetic loosening?].

Authors:  M Otto; J Kriegsmann; T Gehrke; S Bertz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Wear of crosslinked polyethylene under different tribological conditions.

Authors:  Alison Galvin; Lu Kang; Joanne Tipper; Martin Stone; Eileen Ingham; Zhongmin Jin; John Fisher
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  What are the local and systemic biologic reactions and mediators to wear debris, and what host factors determine or modulate the biologic response to wear particles?

Authors:  Rocky S Tuan; Francis Young-In Lee; Yrjö T Konttinen; J Mark Wilkinson; Robert Lane Smith
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Assessment of epidural versus intradiscal biocompatibility of PEEK implant debris: an in vivo rabbit model.

Authors:  Nadim J Hallab; Qi-Bin Bao; Tim Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Elevated cytokine expression of different PEEK wear particles compared to UHMWPE in vivo.

Authors:  V Lorber; A C Paulus; A Buschmann; B Schmitt; T M Grupp; V Jansson; Sandra Utzschneider
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Integrin-directed modulation of macrophage responses to biomaterials.

Authors:  Toral D Zaveri; Jamal S Lewis; Natalia V Dolgova; Michael J Clare-Salzler; Benjamin G Keselowsky
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.