Literature DB >> 15534530

Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns.

John Fisher1, Hannah M J McEwen, Joanne L Tipper, Alison L Galvin, Jo Ingram, Amir Kamali, Martin H Stone, Eileen Ingham.   

Abstract

Cross-linked polyethylene currently is being introduced in knee prostheses. The wear rates, wear debris, and biologic reactivity of non cross-linked, moderately cross-linked, and highly cross-linked polyethylene have been compared in multidirectional wear tests and knee simulators. Multidirectional pin-on-plate wear studies of noncross-linked, moderately cross-linked (5 Mrad), and highly cross-linked (10 Mrad) polyethylene showed a 75% reduction in wear with the highly cross-linked material under kinematics found in the hip, but only a 33% reduction under wear in kinematics representative of the knee. In knee simulator studies, with the fixed-bearing press-fit, condylar Sigma cruciate-retaining knee under high kinematic input conditions, the wear of 5 Mrad moderately cross-linked polyethylene was 13 +/- 4 mm per 1 million cycles, which was lower (p < 0.05) than the wear of clinically used, gamma vacuum foil GUR 1020 polyethylene (23 +/- 6 mm/1 million cycles). For the low-contact stress mobile-bearing knee, the wear of moderately cross-linked polyethylene was 2 +/- 1 mm per 1 million cycles, which was lower (p < 0.05) than GVF GUR 1020 polyethylene (5 +/- 2 mm/1 million cycles). The wear debris isolated from the fixed-bearing knees showed the moderately cross-linked material had a larger percentage volume of particles smaller than 1 mum in size, compared with GVF GUR 1020 polyethylene. Direct cell culture studies of wear debris generated in sterile wear simulators using multidirectional motion showed a increase (p < 0.05) in tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels and reactivity for GUR 1050 cross-linked polyethylene debris compared with an equivalent volume of noncross-linked GUR 1050 polyethylene. The use of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee reduces the volumetric wear rate. However, the clinical significance of reduced fracture toughness, elevated wear in abrasive conditions, and the elevated tumor necrosis factor-alpha release from smaller more reactive particles warrant further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534530     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148783.20469.4c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  46 in total

1.  Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dongwook Kim; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee; Sahnghoon Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of the cytotoxic and inflammatory responses of titanium particles with different methods for endotoxin removal in RAW264.7 macrophages.

Authors:  Huifeng Ding; Zhenan Zhu; Tingting Tang; Degang Yu; Bo Yu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The John Charnley Award: an accurate and sensitive method to separate, display, and characterize wear debris: part 1: polyethylene particles.

Authors:  Fabrizio Billi; Paul Benya; Aaron Kavanaugh; John Adams; Edward Ebramzadeh; Harry McKellop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The incidence of acetabular osteolysis in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Ryan M Nunley; Jin Jun Zhu; William J Maloney; Robert L Barrack; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Implant design influences tibial post wear damage in posterior-stabilized knees.

Authors:  Mark M Dolan; Natalie H Kelly; Joseph T Nguyen; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Wear is reduced in THA performed with highly cross-linked polyethylene.

Authors:  Burak Beksaç; Antonio Salas; Alejandro González Della Valle; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  In vivo determination of cam-post engagement in fixed and mobile-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Sumesh M Zingde; Filip Leszko; Adrija Sharma; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Hodrick; Erik P Severson; Deborah S McAlister; Brian Dahl; Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  2009 Knee Society Presidential Guest Lecture: Polyethylene wear in total knees.

Authors:  John Fisher; Louise M Jennings; Alison L Galvin; Zhongmin M Jin; Martin H Stone; Eileen Ingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Is There a Benefit to Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior-stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.