Literature DB >> 15348363

Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation.

H M McEwen1, J Fisher, A A Goldsmith, D D Auger, C Hardaker, M H Stone.   

Abstract

In order to extend the lifetime of total knee replacements (TKR) in vivo, reduction of the volumetric wear rate of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) bearings remains an important goal. The volume of wear debris generated in fixed bearing total knee devices increases significantly when subjected to higher levels of internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior displacement. Six PFC Sigma fixed bearing TKR were compared with six LCS rotating platform mobile bearing knees using a physiological knee simulator with high rotation kinematic inputs. The rotating platform polyethylene inserts exhibited a mean wear rate which was one-third of that of the fixed bearing inserts despite having increased femoral contact areas and additional tibial wear surfaces. The rotating platform design decouples knee motions, by allowing unidirectional motion at the tray-insert articulation, which reduces rotation at the femoral-insert counterface. This translation of complex knee motions into more unidirectional motions results in molecular orientation of the UHMWPE and reduced volumetric wear. Copyright 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 15348363     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012850224565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  5 in total

1.  Comparative wear under four different tribological conditions of acetylene enhanced cross-linked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.

Authors:  H Marrs; D C Barton; R A Jones; I M Ward; J Fisher; C Doyle
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Comparison of wear in a total knee replacement under different kinematic conditions.

Authors:  P I Barnett; J Fisher; D D Auger; M H Stone; E Ingham
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking.

Authors:  M A Lafortune; P R Cavanagh; H J Sommer; A Kalenak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; L M Kwong; M Jasty; R C Sedlacek; T C Haire; D O O'Connor; C R Bragdon; J M Kabo; A J Malcolm; W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mechanistic and morphological origins of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacement prostheses.

Authors:  A Wang; C Stark; J H Dumbleton
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.617

  5 in total
  24 in total

1.  Kinematics of a highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  N Wolterbeek; E H Garling; B J A Mertens; H M J van der Linden; R G H H Nelissen; E R Valstar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The John Insall Award: no functional advantage of a mobile bearing posterior stabilized TKA.

Authors:  Ormonde M Mahoney; Tracy L Kinsey; Theresa J D'Errico; Jianhua Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR.

Authors:  C Luring; H Bathis; F Oczipka; C Trepte; H Lufen; L Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Farshid Ejtehadi; Rachel Nichols; Leigh Davies; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The influence of third-body particles on wear rate in unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a wear simulator study with bone and cement debris.

Authors:  Christian Schroeder; Thomas M Grupp; Bernhard Fritz; Christoph Schilling; Yan Chevalier; Sandra Utzschneider; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  [Experiences with lateral unicondylar prostheses].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; T Walker; T Gotterbarm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, mobile-bearing, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Ulivi; Luca Orlandini; Valentina Meroni; Olmo Consonni; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.