Literature DB >> 23933100

Characterization of polyethylene wear particle: The impact of methodology.

Christian Schröder1, Jörn Reinders, Carmen Zietz, Sandra Utzschneider, Rainer Bader, J Philippe Kretzer.   

Abstract

Due to the prevalence of problems caused by wear particles, the reduced durability of total joint replacements is well documented. The characterization of wear debris enables the size and morphology of these wear particles to be measured and provides an assessment of the biological response in vivo. However, the impact of different methodologies of particle analysis is not yet clear. Hence, the aim of this investigation was to analyze the influence of different particle characterization methods performed by three research centers within the scope of a "round robin test". To obtain knowledge about possible pitfalls, single steps of the particle characterization process (storage, pore size of the filter, coating durations by gold sputtering and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) magnification) were analyzed. The round robin test showed significant differences between the research groups, especially for the morphology of the particles. The SEM magnification was identified as having the greatest influence on the size and shape of the particles, followed by the storage conditions of the wear particle containing lubricant. Gold sputter coating and filter pore size also exhibit significant effects. However, even though they are statistically significant, it should be emphasized that the differences are small. In conclusion, particle characterization is a complex analytical method with a multiplicity of influencing factors. It becomes apparent that a comparison of wear particle results between different research groups is challenging.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Characterization; Magnification; Round robin test; Storage method; Wear particles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23933100     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  8 in total

1.  [Supramacroparticulate polyethylene in inflammation of synovial-like interface membranes: Characterization and suggested nomenclature].

Authors:  V Krenn; F Hopf; P Thomas; M Thomsen; S Usbeck; F Boettner; S Müller; D Saberi; T Hügle; M Huber; L Scheuber; J C Hopf; J P Kretzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Wear testing of moderate activities of daily living using in vivo measured knee joint loading.

Authors:  Jörn Reinders; Robert Sonntag; Leo Vot; Christian Gibney; Moritz Nowack; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Wear behavior of an unstable knee: stabilization via implant design?

Authors:  Jörn Reinders; Robert Sonntag; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  PMMA third-body wear after unicondylar knee arthroplasty decuples the UHMWPE wear particle generation in vitro.

Authors:  Alexander Christoph Paulus; Manja Franke; Michael Kraxenberger; Christian Schröder; Volkmar Jansson; Sandra Utzschneider
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Wear Debris Characterization and Corresponding Biological Response: Artificial Hip and Knee Joints.

Authors:  Md J Nine; Dipankar Choudhury; Ay Ching Hee; Rajshree Mootanah; Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Mixed material wear particle isolation from periprosthetic tissue surrounding total joint replacements.

Authors:  Ashley A Stratton-Powell; Sophie Williams; Joanne L Tipper; Anthony C Redmond; Claire L Brockett
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Analysis of the osseointegrative force of a hyperhydrophilic and nanostructured surface refinement for TPS surfaces in a gap healing model with the Göttingen minipig.

Authors:  Roland Seidling; Lars J Lehmann; Manuel Lingner; Eckhard Mauermann; Udo Obertacke; Markus L R Schwarz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Rheologic Behavior of Bovine Calf Serum.

Authors:  Tanja Wonerow; Maximilian Uhler; Jens Nuppnau; J Philippe Kretzer; Frank Mantwill
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.