Literature DB >> 25786942

Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Matthew J Goupell1.   

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) listeners can perform binaural tasks, but they are typically worse than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. To understand why this difference occurs and the mechanisms involved in processing dynamic binaural differences, interaural envelope correlation change discrimination sensitivity was measured in real and simulated CI users. In experiment 1, 11 CI (eight late deafened, three early deafened) and eight NH listeners were tested in an envelope correlation change discrimination task. Just noticeable differences (JNDs) were best for a matched place-of-stimulation and increased for an increasing mismatch. In experiment 2, attempts at intracranially centering stimuli did not produce lower JNDs. In experiment 3, the percentage of correct identifications of antiphasic carrier pulse trains modulated by correlated envelopes was measured as a function of mismatch and pulse rate. Sensitivity decreased for increasing mismatch and increasing pulse rate. The experiments led to two conclusions. First, envelope correlation change discrimination necessitates place-of-stimulation matched inputs. However, it is unclear if previous experience with acoustic hearing is necessary for envelope correlation change discrimination. Second, NH listeners presented with CI simulations demonstrated better performance than real CI listeners. If the simulations are realistic representations of electrical stimuli, real CI listeners appear to have difficulty processing interaural information in modulated signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25786942      PMCID: PMC4368584          DOI: 10.1121/1.4908221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  41 in total

1.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A place theory of sound localization.

Authors:  L A JEFFRESS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

4.  Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.

Authors:  Lieselot Van Deun; Astrid van Wieringen; Tom Francart; Fanny Scherf; Ingeborg J Dhooge; Naïma Deggouj; Christian Desloovere; Paul H Van de Heyning; F Erwin Offeciers; Leo De Raeve; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms.

Authors:  Mathieu Lavandier; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Gary L Jones; Smita Agrawal; Richard van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Binaural unmasking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Robert P Carlyon; Ruth Y Litovsky; Daniel H Downs
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-08-29
View more
  17 in total

1.  Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stefano Cosentino; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

2.  Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.