Literature DB >> 19813804

An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises.

Sean A Davidson1, Robert H Gilkey, H Steven Colburn, Laurel H Carney.   

Abstract

Several psychophysical models for masked detection were evaluated using reproducible noises. The data were hit and false-alarm rates from three psychophysical studies of detection of 500-Hz tones in reproducible noise under diotic (N0S0) and dichotic (N0Spi) conditions with four stimulus bandwidths (50, 100, 115, and 2900 Hz). Diotic data were best predicted by an energy-based multiple-detector model that linearly combined stimulus energies at the outputs of several critical-band filters. The tone-plus-noise trials in the dichotic data were best predicted by models that linearly combined either the average values or the standard deviations of interaural time and level differences; however, these models offered no predictions for noise-alone responses. The decision variables of more complicated temporal models, including the models of Dau et al. [(1996a). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3615-3622] and Breebaart et al. [(2001a). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1074-1088], were weakly correlated with subjects' responses. Comparisons of the dependencies of each model on envelope and fine-structure cues to those in the data suggested that dependence upon both envelope and fine structure, as well as an interaction between them, is required to predict the detection results.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19813804      PMCID: PMC2771055          DOI: 10.1121/1.3206583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  The variation across time of sensitivity to interaural disparities: behavioral measurements and quantitative analyses.

Authors:  M A Akeroyd; L R Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: I. Results for human.

Authors:  Mary E Evilsizer; Robert H Gilkey; Christine R Mason; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters.

Authors:  J Breebaart; S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters.

Authors:  J Breebaart; S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure.

Authors:  J Breebaart; S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  D McAlpine; D Jiang; A R Palmer
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A temporal model of level-invariant, tone-in-noise detection.

Authors:  Bruce G Berg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Diotic and dichotic detection with reproducible chimeric stimuli.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection of auditory signals in reproducible noise.

Authors:  S M Pfafflin; M V Mathews
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

1.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. IV. The effect of compression on stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Predictions of diotic tone-in-noise detection based on a nonlinear optimal combination of energy, envelope, and fine-structure cues.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Azadeh Vosoughi; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.

Authors:  U-Cheng Leong; Douglas M Schwarz; Kenneth S Henry; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Suboptimal use of neural information in a mammalian auditory system.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Muhammad S A Zilany; Nicholas J Huang; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

6.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Tone-in-noise detection using envelope cues: comparison of signal-processing-based and physiological models.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

9.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.