Literature DB >> 25673738

Transspinal direct current stimulation immediately modifies motor cortex sensorimotor maps.

Weiguo Song1, Dennis Q Truong2, Marom Bikson2, John H Martin3.   

Abstract

Motor cortex (MCX) motor representation reorganization occurs after injury, learning, and different long-term stimulation paradigms. The neuromodulatory approach of transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) has been used to promote evoked cortical motor responses. In the present study, we used cathodal tsDCS (c-tsDCS) of the rat cervical cord to determine if spinal cord activation can modify the MCX forelimb motor map. We used a finite-element method model based on coregistered high-resolution rat MRI and microcomputed tomography imaging data to predict spinal current density to target stimulation to the caudal cervical enlargement. We examined the effects of cathodal and anodal tsDCS on the H-reflex and c-tsDCS on responses evoked by intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). To determine if cervical c-tsDCS also modified MCX somatic sensory processing, we examined sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) produced by wrist electrical stimulation and induced changes in ongoing activity. Cervical c-tsDCS enhanced the H-reflex, and anodal depressed the H-reflex. Using cathodal stimulation to examine cortical effects, we found that cervical c-tsDCS immediately modified the forelimb MCX motor map, with decreased thresholds and an expanded area. c-tsDCS also increased SEP amplitude in the MCX. The magnitude of changes produced by c-tsDCS were greater on the motor than sensory response. Cervical c-tsDCS more strongly enhanced forelimb than hindlimb motor representation and had no effect on vibrissal representation. The finite-element model indicated current density localized to caudal cervical segments, informing forelimb motor selectivity. Our results suggest that c-tsDCS augments spinal excitability in a spatially selective manner and may improve voluntary motor function through MCX representational plasticity.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor cortex; movement control; neuromodulation; rehabilitation; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673738      PMCID: PMC4416633          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00784.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  45 in total

1.  Effects of cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation on mouse spinal network and complex multijoint movements.

Authors:  Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Reversible large-scale modification of cortical networks during neuroprosthetic control.

Authors:  Karunesh Ganguly; Dragan F Dimitrov; Jonathan D Wallis; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Back seat driving: hindlimb corticospinal neurons assume forelimb control following ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Michelle Louise Starkey; Christiane Bleul; Björn Zörner; Nicolas Thomas Lindau; Thomas Mueggler; Markus Rudin; Martin Ernst Schwab
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation: finite element analysis of the electric field and current density.

Authors:  Gabriel R Hernández-Labrado; José L Polo; Elisa López-Dolado; Jorge E Collazos-Castro
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in primate corticospinal connections induced during free behavior.

Authors:  Yukio Nishimura; Steve I Perlmutter; Ryan W Eaton; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Electrophysiological characterization of spino-sciatic and cortico-sciatic associative plasticity: modulation by trans-spinal direct current and effects on recovery after spinal cord injury in mice.

Authors:  Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Davide Reato; Mattia Arlotti; Fernando Gasca; Abhishek Datta; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Morgana Croce da Silva; Catarine Lima Conti; Jaisa Klauss; Luana Gaburro Alves; Henrique Mineiro do Nascimento Cavalcante; Felipe Fregni; Michael A Nitsche; Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2013-07-25

9.  Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Josef Ladenbauer; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.094

10.  Differential joint-specific corticospinal tract projections within the cervical enlargement.

Authors:  Curtis O Asante; John H Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  23 in total

1.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Safety parameter considerations of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Dennis Truong; Milene L Brownlow; Jessica A Wagner; R Andy McKinley; Marom Bikson; Ryan Jankord
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and motor recovery after cervical contusion spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N Zareen; M Shinozaki; D Ryan; H Alexander; A Amer; D Q Truong; N Khadka; A Sarkar; S Naeem; M Bikson; J H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Oluwole O Awosika; Marco Sandrini; Rita Volochayev; Ryan M Thompson; Nathan Fishman; Tianxia Wu; Mary Kay Floeter; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Does trans-spinal and local DC polarization affect presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression?

Authors:  D Kaczmarek; J Ristikankare; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Aditya Ramamurthy; Sophia Lall; Joshua Santos; Shivakeshavan Ratnadurai-Giridharan; Madeleine Lopane; Neela Zareen; Heather Alexander; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Engaging Cervical Spinal Cord Networks to Reenable Volitional Control of Hand Function in Tetraplegic Patients.

Authors:  Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton; Morteza Modaber; Nicholas AuYong; Erika Morikawa; Sharon Zdunowski; Melanie E Sarino; Majid Sarrafzadeh; Marc R Nuwer; Roland R Roy; Yury Gerasimenko
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Alzahraa Amer; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Dennis Q Truong; Preston Williams; John H Martin; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.