Literature DB >> 28031400

Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Weiguo Song1, John H Martin2,3.   

Abstract

Spinal cord direct current stimulation (sDCS) has the potential for promoting motor function after injury through its modulatory actions on sensory processing, reflex functions, the motor cortex (M1) motor map, and motor output. Here we addressed systems-level mechanisms underlying sDCS neuromodulation of spinal circuits activated by M1 and peripheral forelimb electrical stimulation in anesthetized healthy rats. We determined the effects of cathodal and anodal sDCS (c- and a-sDCS) on local field potentials (LFP) and single-unit activity recorded at 32 sites simultaneously within the sixth cervical segment using a silicon multielectrode array. M1 stimulation produced distinctive dorsomedial and ventral LFP responses that showed polarity-dependent sDCS modulation. c-sDCS enhanced and a-sDCS depressed significantly ventral M1 responses; neither modulated dorsal responses significantly. Using evoked changes in β- and γ-oscillations to assay network function, c-sDCS enhanced and a-sDCS reduced oscillation power ventrally. c-sDCS increased and a-sDCS decreased background firing and firing synchrony of recorded pairs of single units. Peripheral stimulation produced a region-dependent response that showed polarity-dependent sDCS modulation. The dorsomedial LFP was unaffected by c-sDCS and weakly suppressed with a-sDCS. Peripheral-evoked unit responses showed limited polarity dependence. Our findings stress that ventral motor network behavior is enhanced by the neuromodulatory actions of c-sDCS. The combined actions of c-sDCS on M1-evoked neural responses and network behavior in the cervical spinal cord help explain the reported enhanced motor effects of this neuromodulation approach and inform the mechanisms of sDCS for promoting motor rehabilitation after spinal cord or brain injury.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Spinal cord direct current stimulation (sDCS) modulates spinal functions and shows potential for neural rehabilitation after motor systems injury. Using a multichannel electrode array, we found that cathodal DCS enhanced, and anodal depressed, M1-evoked local field potentials, network oscillations, neuronal activity, and neuronal synchrony, especially in the ventral horn. With this new understanding, it is hoped that sDCS can be developed into a tunable spinal neuromodulatory tool for promoting function after brain or spinal injury.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28031400      PMCID: PMC5340879          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00584.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  36 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions.

Authors:  W Yao; R J Fuglevand; R M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Corticospinal beta-range coherence is highly dependent on the pre-stationary motor state.

Authors:  Wolfgang Omlor; Luis Patino; Ignacio Mendez-Balbuena; Jürgen Schulte-Mönting; Rumyana Kristeva
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Transspinal direct current stimulation immediately modifies motor cortex sensorimotor maps.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation: finite element analysis of the electric field and current density.

Authors:  Gabriel R Hernández-Labrado; José L Polo; Elisa López-Dolado; Jorge E Collazos-Castro
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  Filippo Cogiamanian; Maurizio Vergari; Francesca Pulecchi; Sara Marceglia; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Davide Reato; Mattia Arlotti; Fernando Gasca; Abhishek Datta; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation in idiopathic restless legs patients.

Authors:  A C Heide; T Winkler; H J Helms; M A Nitsche; C Trenkwalder; W Paulus; C G Bachmann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Spontaneous local gamma oscillation selectively enhances neural network responsiveness.

Authors:  Se-Bum Paik; Tribhawan Kumar; Donald A Glaser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and motor recovery after cervical contusion spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N Zareen; M Shinozaki; D Ryan; H Alexander; A Amer; D Q Truong; N Khadka; A Sarkar; S Naeem; M Bikson; J H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  The effect of cathodal transspinal direct current stimulation on tibialis anterior stretch reflex components in humans.

Authors:  Eva Rudjord Therkildsen; Jens Bo Nielsen; Mikkel Malling Beck; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Jakob Lorentzen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spinal cord representation of motor cortex plasticity reflects corticospinal tract LTP.

Authors:  Alzahraa Amer; Jianxun Xia; Michael Smith; John H Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Transneuronal Downregulation of the Premotor Cholinergic System After Corticospinal Tract Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Qiu Jiang; Adrish Sarkar; Alzahraa Amer; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Intrinsic functional architecture of the non-human primate spinal cord derived from fMRI and electrophysiology.

Authors:  Tung-Lin Wu; Pai-Feng Yang; Feng Wang; Zhaoyue Shi; Arabinda Mishra; Ruiqi Wu; Li Min Chen; John C Gore
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Lamina-specific population encoding of cutaneous signals in the spinal dorsal horn using multi-electrode arrays.

Authors:  Charles M Greenspon; Emma E Battell; Ian M Devonshire; Lucy F Donaldson; Victoria Chapman; Gareth J Hathway
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) in hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP): A sham-controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Gianluca Ardolino; Tommaso Bocci; Martina Nigro; Maurizio Vergari; Alessio Di Fonzo; Sara Bonato; Filippo Cogiamanian; Francesca Cortese; Ilaria Cova; Sergio Barbieri; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Mikkel M Beck; Eva R Therkildsen; Christian Svane; Christian Forman; Jakob Lorentzen; Bernard A Conway; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Svend S Geertsen; Jens B Nielsen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08

10.  The Regenerative Effect of Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms and Pathways Underlying the Effect.

Authors:  C Chalfouh; C Guillou; J Hardouin; Q Delarue; X Li; C Duclos; D Schapman; J-P Marie; P Cosette; N Guérout
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.