Literature DB >> 31125548

Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats.

Qi Yang1, Aditya Ramamurthy1, Sophia Lall2, Joshua Santos2, Shivakeshavan Ratnadurai-Giridharan2, Madeleine Lopane2, Neela Zareen3, Heather Alexander3, Daniel Ryan3, John H Martin4, Jason B Carmel5.   

Abstract

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4-7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0-9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticospinal; Direct current stimulation; Electrical stimulation; Motor cortex; Motor recovery; Spinal cord; Spinal cord injury; Transcutaneous; iTBS

Year:  2019        PMID: 31125548      PMCID: PMC7035596          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  28 in total

1.  Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI.

Authors:  A M Sherwood; M R Dimitrijevic; W B McKay
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 2.  Modeling sequence and quasi-uniform assumption in computational neurostimulation.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Dennis Q Truong; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Mohamed Aboseria; Niranjan Khadka; Devin Adair; Asif Rahman
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Electrical stimulation of motor cortex in the uninjured hemisphere after chronic unilateral injury promotes recovery of skilled locomotion through ipsilateral control.

Authors:  Jason B Carmel; Hiroki Kimura; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortico-reticulo-spinal circuit reorganization enables functional recovery after severe spinal cord contusion.

Authors:  Leonie Asboth; Lucia Friedli; Janine Beauparlant; Cristina Martinez-Gonzalez; Selin Anil; Elodie Rey; Laetitia Baud; Galyna Pidpruzhnykova; Mark A Anderson; Polina Shkorbatova; Laura Batti; Stephane Pagès; Julie Kreider; Bernard L Schneider; Quentin Barraud; Gregoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Mark J Edwards; Elisabeth Rounis; Kailash P Bhatia; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Chronic softening spinal cord stimulation arrays.

Authors:  Aldo Garcia-Sandoval; Ajay Pal; Asht M Mishra; Sydney Sherman; Ankit R Parikh; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; David Arreaga-Salas; Gerardo Gutierrez-Heredia; Adriana C Duran-Martinez; Jordan Nathan; Seyed Mahmoud Hosseini; Jason B Carmel; Walter Voit
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Epidural spinal cord stimulation plus quipazine administration enable stepping in complete spinal adult rats.

Authors:  Yury P Gerasimenko; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Igor A Lavrov; Gregoire Courtine; Lance Cai; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Alzahraa Amer; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 9.  Paired Stimulation to Promote Lasting Augmentation of Corticospinal Circuits.

Authors:  Noam Y Harel; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more
  8 in total

1.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation modulates biceps brachii corticomotor excitability in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Blockade of Motor Cortical Long-Term Potentiation Induction by Glutamatergic Dysfunction Causes Abnormal Neurobehavior in an Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Model.

Authors:  Minoru Fujiki; Kazuhiro Kuga; Harushige Ozaki; Yukari Kawasaki; Hirotaka Fudaba
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 4.  Targeting Sensory and Motor Integration for Recovery of Movement After CNS Injury.

Authors:  Ahmet S Asan; James R McIntosh; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Posteroanterior Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Interactions with Cortical and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Jaclyn R Wecht; William M Savage; Grace O Famodimu; Gregory A Mendez; Jonah M Levine; Matthew T Maher; Joseph P Weir; Jill M Wecht; Jason B Carmel; Yu-Kuang Wu; Noam Y Harel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  A non-invasive system to monitor in vivo neural graft activity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kentaro Ago; Narihito Nagoshi; Kent Imaizumi; Takahiro Kitagawa; Momotaro Kawai; Keita Kajikawa; Reo Shibata; Yasuhiro Kamata; Kota Kojima; Munehisa Shinozaki; Takahiro Kondo; Satoshi Iwano; Atsushi Miyawaki; Masanari Ohtsuka; Haruhiko Bito; Kenta Kobayashi; Shinsuke Shibata; Tomoko Shindo; Jun Kohyama; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Hideyuki Okano
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 7.  When Spinal Neuromodulation Meets Sensorimotor Rehabilitation: Lessons Learned From Animal Models to Regain Manual Dexterity After a Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  África Flores; Diego López-Santos; Guillermo García-Alías
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 8.  Enhancing rehabilitation and functional recovery after brain and spinal cord trauma with electrical neuromodulation.

Authors:  Anna-Sophie Hofer; Martin E Schwab
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.710

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.