Literature DB >> 23478132

Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Asif Rahman1, Davide Reato, Mattia Arlotti, Fernando Gasca, Abhishek Datta, Lucas C Parra, Marom Bikson.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique to modulate cortical excitability. Although increased/decreased excitability under the anode/cathode electrode is nominally associated with membrane depolarization/hyperpolarization, which cellular compartments (somas, dendrites, axons and their terminals) mediate changes in cortical excitability remains unaddressed. Here we consider the acute effects of DCS on excitatory synaptic efficacy. Using multi-scale computational models and rat cortical brain slices, we show the following. (1) Typical tDCS montages produce predominantly tangential (relative to the cortical surface) direction currents (4-12 times radial direction currents), even directly under electrodes. (2) Radial current flow (parallel to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy consistent with somatic polarization, with depolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (3) Tangential current flow (perpendicular to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy acutely (during stimulation) in an afferent pathway-specific manner that is consistent with terminal polarization, with hyperpolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (4) Maximal polarization during uniform DCS is expected at distal (the branch length is more than three times the membrane length constant) synaptic terminals, independent of and two-three times more susceptible than pyramidal neuron somas. We conclude that during acute DCS the cellular targets responsible for modulation of synaptic efficacy are concurrently somata and axon terminals, with the direction of cortical current flow determining the relative influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478132      PMCID: PMC3678043          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  57 in total

1.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity.

Authors:  O D CREUTZFELDT; G H FROMM; H KAPP
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Mobilization of transmitter by hyperpolarization.

Authors:  J I HUBBARD; W D WILLIS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The role of tissue heterogeneity in neural stimulation by applied electric fields.

Authors:  Pedro C Miranda; Ludovic Correia; Ricardo Salvador; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

5.  Anatomical, physiological, molecular and circuit properties of nest basket cells in the developing somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Anirudh Gupta; Maria Toledo-Rodriguez; Cai Zhi Wu; Henry Markram
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The effects of depolarization of motor nerve terminals upon the release of transmitter by nerve impulses.

Authors:  J I Hubbard; W D Willis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Influence of electric fields on the excitability of granule cells in guinea-pig hippocampal slices.

Authors:  J G Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Asif Rahman; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The patterns and synaptic properties of horizontal intracortical connections in the rat motor cortex.

Authors:  V A Aroniadou; A Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Intracellular recording from the giant synapse of the squid.

Authors:  T H BULLOCK; S HAGIWARA
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1957-03-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  168 in total

1.  Cortical neuron activation induced by electromagnetic stimulation: a quantitative analysis via modelling and simulation.

Authors:  Tiecheng Wu; Jie Fan; Kim Seng Lee; Xiaoping Li
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Michael Marsiske; Gene E Alexander; Sara J Czaja; Samuel Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Lasting modulation of in vitro oscillatory activity with weak direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Clinician accessible tools for GUI computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES.

Authors:  Dennis Q Truong; Mathias Hüber; Xihe Xie; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Exploring new transcranial electrical stimulation strategies to modulate brain function in animal models.

Authors:  Carlos A Sánchez-León; Álvaro Sánchez-López; Claudia Ammann; Isabel Cordones; Alejandro Carretero-Guillén; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-09-12

Review 7.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Affective Symptoms and Functioning in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mariano; Frederick W Burgess; Marguerite Bowker; Jason Kirschner; Mascha Van't Wout-Frank; Richard N Jones; Christopher W Halladay; Michael Stein; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  EEG Functional Connectivity is a Weak Predictor of Causal Brain Interactions.

Authors:  Jord J T Vink; Deborah C W Klooster; Recep A Ozdemir; M Brandon Westover; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Mouhsin M Shafi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.