Literature DB >> 26708732

Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury.

Weiguo Song1, Alzahraa Amer1, Daniel Ryan1, John H Martin2.   

Abstract

An important strategy for promoting voluntary movements after motor system injury is to harness activity-dependent corticospinal tract (CST) plasticity. We combine forelimb motor cortex (M1) activation with co-activation of its cervical spinal targets in rats to promote CST sprouting and skilled limb movement after pyramidal tract lesion (PTX). We used a two-step experimental design in which we first established the optimal combined stimulation protocol in intact rats and then used the optimal protocol in injured animals to promote CST repair and motor recovery. M1 was activated epidurally using an electrical analog of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). The cervical spinal cord was co-activated by trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) that was targeted to the cervical enlargement, simulated from finite element method. In intact rats, forelimb motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were strongly facilitated during iTBS and for 10 min after cessation of stimulation. Cathodal, not anodal, tsDCS alone facilitated MEPs and also produced a facilitatory aftereffect that peaked at 10 min. Combined iTBS and cathodal tsDCS (c-tsDCS) produced further MEP enhancement during stimulation, but without further aftereffect enhancement. Correlations between forelimb M1 local field potentials and forelimb electromyogram (EMG) during locomotion increased after electrical iTBS alone and further increased with combined stimulation (iTBS+c-tsDCS). This optimized combined stimulation was then used to promote function after PTX because it enhanced functional connections between M1 and spinal circuits and greater M1 engagement in muscle contraction than either stimulation alone. Daily application of combined M1 iTBS on the intact side and c-tsDCS after PTX (10 days, 27 min/day) significantly restored skilled movements during horizontal ladder walking. Stimulation produced a 5.4-fold increase in spared ipsilateral CST terminations. Combined neuromodulation achieves optimal motor recovery and substantial CST outgrowth with only 27 min of daily stimulation compared with 6h, as in our prior study, making it a potential therapy for humans with spinal cord injury.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity-dependent plasticity; Axon sprouting; Brain stimulation; Corticospinal tract; Motor cortex; Pyramidal tract lesion; Theta burst stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708732      PMCID: PMC4807330          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  51 in total

Review 1.  Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system.

Authors:  Gina G Turrigiano; Sacha B Nelson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Motor evoked potential monitoring for spinal cord and brain stem surgery.

Authors:  F Sala; P Lanteri; A Bricolo
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2004

3.  Patterned stimulation at the theta frequency is optimal for the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation.

Authors:  J Larson; D Wong; G Lynch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-03-19       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Motor cortical activity during voluntary gait modifications in the cat. I. Cells related to the forelimbs.

Authors:  T Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; J T Massey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Mark J Edwards; Elisabeth Rounis; Kailash P Bhatia; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Cortical and subcortical lesions impair skilled walking in the ladder rung walking test: a new task to evaluate fore- and hindlimb stepping, placing, and co-ordination.

Authors:  Gerlinde A Metz; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Age and gender effects on microglia and astrocyte numbers in brains of mice.

Authors:  Peter R Mouton; Jeffrey M Long; De-Liang Lei; Victor Howard; Mathias Jucker; Michael E Calhoun; Donald K Ingram
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kleim; Rochelle Bruneau; Penny VandenBerg; Erin MacDonald; Renee Mulrooney; David Pocock
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.448

10.  The role of the motor cortex in the control of accuracy of locomotor movements in the cat.

Authors:  I N Beloozerova; M G Sirota
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  23 in total

1.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and motor recovery after cervical contusion spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N Zareen; M Shinozaki; D Ryan; H Alexander; A Amer; D Q Truong; N Khadka; A Sarkar; S Naeem; M Bikson; J H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Aditya Ramamurthy; Sophia Lall; Joshua Santos; Shivakeshavan Ratnadurai-Giridharan; Madeleine Lopane; Neela Zareen; Heather Alexander; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 4.  Retracing your footsteps: developmental insights to spinal network plasticity following injury.

Authors:  C Jean-Xavier; S A Sharples; K A Mayr; A P Lognon; P J Whelan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation modulates biceps brachii corticomotor excitability in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 5.208

6.  Spinal cord representation of motor cortex plasticity reflects corticospinal tract LTP.

Authors:  Alzahraa Amer; Jianxun Xia; Michael Smith; John H Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Repeated anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation results in long-term reduction of spasticity in mice with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wagdy Mekhael; Sultana Begum; Sreyashi Samaddar; Mazen Hassan; Pedro Toruno; Malik Ahmed; Alexis Gorin; Michael Maisano; Mark Ayad; Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Transneuronal Downregulation of the Premotor Cholinergic System After Corticospinal Tract Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Qiu Jiang; Adrish Sarkar; Alzahraa Amer; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutson; Simone Di Giovanni
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Monitoring Upper Limb Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Insights beyond Assessment Scores.

Authors:  Michael Brogioli; Sophie Schneider; Werner L Popp; Urs Albisser; Anne K Brust; Inge-Marie Velstra; Roger Gassert; Armin Curt; Michelle L Starkey
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.