Literature DB >> 28803750

Motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and motor recovery after cervical contusion spinal cord injury.

N Zareen1, M Shinozaki1, D Ryan1, H Alexander1, A Amer2, D Q Truong3, N Khadka3, A Sarkar1, S Naeem1, M Bikson3, J H Martin4.   

Abstract

Cervical injuries are the most common form of SCI. In this study, we used a neuromodulatory approach to promote skilled movement recovery and repair of the corticospinal tract (CST) after a moderately severe C4 midline contusion in adult rats. We used bilateral epidural intermittent theta burst (iTBS) electrical stimulation of motor cortex to promote CST axonal sprouting and cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) to enhance spinal cord activation to motor cortex stimulation after injury. We used Finite Element Method (FEM) modeling to direct tsDCS to the cervical enlargement. Combined iTBS-tsDCS was delivered for 30min daily for 10days. We compared the effect of stimulation on performance in the horizontal ladder and the Irvine Beattie and Bresnahan forepaw manipulation tasks and CST axonal sprouting in injury-only and injury+stimulation animals. The contusion eliminated the dorsal CST in all animals. tsDCS significantly enhanced motor cortex evoked responses after C4 injury. Using this combined spinal-M1 neuromodulatory approach, we found significant recovery of skilled locomotion and forepaw manipulation skills compared with injury-only controls. The spared CST axons caudal to the lesion in both animal groups derived mostly from lateral CST axons that populated the contralateral intermediate zone. Stimulation enhanced injury-dependent CST axonal outgrowth below and above the level of the injury. This dual neuromodulatory approach produced partial recovery of skilled motor behaviors that normally require integration of posture, upper limb sensory information, and intent for performance. We propose that the motor systems use these new CST projections to control movements better after injury.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical contusion; Corticospinal tract; FEM modeling; Intermittent theta burst stimulation; Motor cortex; Rat; Skilled limb movement; Trans-spinal direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28803750      PMCID: PMC5612913          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  49 in total

1.  Dexterous finger movements in primate without monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal excitation.

Authors:  Shigeto Sasaki; Tadashi Isa; Lars-Gunnar Pettersson; Bror Alstermark; Kimisato Naito; Kazuya Yoshimura; Kazuhiko Seki; Yukari Ohki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Electrical stimulation of spared corticospinal axons augments connections with ipsilateral spinal motor circuits after injury.

Authors:  Marcel Brus-Ramer; Jason B Carmel; Samit Chakrabarty; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of PTEN and Nogo Codeletion on Corticospinal Axon Sprouting and Regeneration in Mice.

Authors:  Cédric G Geoffroy; Ariana O Lorenzana; Jeffrey P Kwan; Kyle Lin; Omeed Ghassemi; Andrew Ma; Nuo Xu; Daniel Creger; Kai Liu; Zhigang He; Binhai Zheng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Transspinal direct current stimulation immediately modifies motor cortex sensorimotor maps.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Using motor behavior during an early critical period to restore skilled limb movement after damage to the corticospinal system during development.

Authors:  Kathleen Friel; Samit Chakrabarty; Hsing-Ching Kuo; John Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Davide Reato; Mattia Arlotti; Fernando Gasca; Abhishek Datta; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Transneuronal labelling of neurones projecting to forelimb motoneurones in cats performing different movements.

Authors:  B Alstermark; H Kümmel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-06-25       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  The Irvine, Beatties, and Bresnahan (IBB) Forelimb Recovery Scale: An Assessment of Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Karen-Amanda Irvine; Adam R Ferguson; Kathleen D Mitchell; Stephanie B Beattie; Amity Lin; Ellen D Stuck; J Russell Huie; Jessica L Nielson; Jason F Talbott; Tomoo Inoue; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  20 in total

1.  Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Aditya Ramamurthy; Sophia Lall; Joshua Santos; Shivakeshavan Ratnadurai-Giridharan; Madeleine Lopane; Neela Zareen; Heather Alexander; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Spinal cord representation of motor cortex plasticity reflects corticospinal tract LTP.

Authors:  Alzahraa Amer; Jianxun Xia; Michael Smith; John H Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  High-Intensity Variable Stepping Training in Patients With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.

Authors:  Carey L Holleran; Patrick W Hennessey; Abigail L Leddy; Gordhan B Mahtani; Gabrielle Brazg; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Association Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Spinal Morphometry and Sensorimotor Behavior in a Hemicontusion Model of Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Jyothsna Chitturi; Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Peter Herman; Fahmeed Hyder; Li Ni; Stella Elkabes; Robert Heary; Sridhar S Kannurpatti
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2020-10-29

6.  Repeated anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation results in long-term reduction of spasticity in mice with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wagdy Mekhael; Sultana Begum; Sreyashi Samaddar; Mazen Hassan; Pedro Toruno; Malik Ahmed; Alexis Gorin; Michael Maisano; Mark Ayad; Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Spinal cord repair: advances in biology and technology.

Authors:  Grégoire Courtine; Michael V Sofroniew
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 8.  The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutson; Simone Di Giovanni
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Brief Electrical Stimulation Triggers an Effective Regeneration of Leech CNS.

Authors:  Sharon Cohen; Alon Richter-Levin; Orit Shefi
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-06-25

10.  Transcriptome of rat subcortical white matter and spinal cord after spinal injury and cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Bethany R Kondiles; Haichao Wei; Lesley S Chaboub; Philip J Horner; Jia Qian Wu; Steve I Perlmutter
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.