Literature DB >> 21409426

Spinal cord direct current stimulation: finite element analysis of the electric field and current density.

Gabriel R Hernández-Labrado1, José L Polo, Elisa López-Dolado, Jorge E Collazos-Castro.   

Abstract

Applied low-intensity direct current (DC) stimulates and directs axonal growth in models of spinal cord injury (SCI) and may have therapeutic value in humans. Using higher electric strengths will probably increase the beneficial effects, but this faces the risk of tissue damage by electricity or toxic reactions at the electrode-tissue interface. To inform the optimisation of DC-based therapeutics, we developed a finite element model (FEM) of the human cervical spine and calculated the electric fields (EFs) and current densities produced by electrodes of different size, geometry and location. The presence of SCI was also considered. Three disc electrodes placed outside the spine produced low-intensity, uneven EFs, whereas the EFs generated by the same electrodes located epidurally were about three times more intense. Changes in electrical conductivity after SCI had little effect on the EF magnitudes. Uniformly distributed EFs were obtained with five disc electrodes placed around the dura mater, but not with a paddle-type electrode placed in the dorsal epidural space. Replacing the five disc electrodes by a single, large band electrode yielded EFs > 5 mV/mm with relatively low current density (2.5 μA/mm(2)) applied. With further optimisation, epidural, single-band electrodes might enhance the effectiveness of spinal cord DC stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21409426     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0756-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  48 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation as therapy for neurological disorder.

Authors:  Roy L Testerman; Mark T Rise; Paul H Stypulkowski
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

2.  Analysis of current density and related parameters in spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  W A Wesselink; J Holsheimer; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1998-06

3.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature.

Authors:  S B Baumann; D R Wozny; S K Kelly; F M Meno
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Electrical field distribution within the injured cat spinal cord: injury potentials and field distribution.

Authors:  T Khan; J Myklebust; T Swiontek; S Sayers; M Dauzvardis
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Electric field distribution within normal cat spinal cord.

Authors:  T Khan; J Myklebust; T Swiontek; S Sayers
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord: a further analysis relating to anatomical factors and tissue properties.

Authors:  W K Sin; B Coburn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Olfactory glia transplantation into cervical spinal cord contusion injuries.

Authors:  Jorge E Collazos-Castro; Vilma C Muñetón-Gómez; Manuel Nieto-Sampedro
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-10

9.  Sagittal evaluation of elemental geometrical dimensions of human vertebrae.

Authors:  I Gilad; M Nissan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Dose-response study of the pathological effects of chronically applied direct current stimulation on the normal rat spinal cord.

Authors:  R J Hurlbert; C H Tator; E Theriault
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  19 in total

1.  The effects of paranodal myelin damage on action potential depend on axonal structure.

Authors:  Ehsan Daneshi Kohan; Behnia Shadab Lashkari; Carolyn Jennifer Sparrey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Safety of multi-channel stimulation implants: a single blocking capacitor per channel is not sufficient after single-fault failure.

Authors:  Antoine Nonclercq; Laurent Lonys; Anne Vanhoestenberghe; Andreas Demosthenous; Nick Donaldson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Sara Marceglia; Maurizio Vergari; Valeria Cognetto; Filippo Cogiamanian; Ferdinando Sartucci; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Transspinal direct current stimulation immediately modifies motor cortex sensorimotor maps.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Long-lasting increase in axonal excitability after epidurally applied DC.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska; Dominik Kaczmarek; Francesco Bolzoni; Ingela Hammar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and motor recovery after cervical contusion spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N Zareen; M Shinozaki; D Ryan; H Alexander; A Amer; D Q Truong; N Khadka; A Sarkar; S Naeem; M Bikson; J H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Comparison of spinal cord stimulation profiles from intra- and extradural electrode arrangements by finite element modelling.

Authors:  Qiujun Huang; Hiroyuki Oya; Oliver E Flouty; Chandan G Reddy; Matthew A Howard; George T Gillies; Marcel Utz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Analyzing the tradeoff between electrical complexity and accuracy in patient-specific computational models of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.