Literature DB >> 21401670

Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study.

Simon M Danner1, Ursula S Hofstoetter, Josef Ladenbauer, Frank Rattay, Karen Minassian.   

Abstract

Stimulation of different spinal cord segments in humans is a widely developed clinical practice for modification of pain, altered sensation, and movement. The human lumbar cord has become a target for modification of motor control by epidural and, more recently, by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. Posterior columns of the lumbar spinal cord represent a vertical system of axons and when activated can add other inputs to the motor control of the spinal cord than stimulated posterior roots. We used a detailed three-dimensional volume conductor model of the torso and the McIntyre-Richard-Grill axon model to calculate the thresholds of axons within the posterior columns in response to transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord stimulation. Superficially located large-diameter posterior column fibers with multiple collaterals have a threshold of 45.4 V, three times higher than posterior root fibers (14.1 V). With the stimulation strength needed to activate posterior column axons, posterior root fibers of large and small diameters as well as anterior root fibers are coactivated. The reported results inform on these threshold differences, when stimulation is applied to the posterior structures of the lumbar cord at intensities above the threshold of large-diameter posterior root fibers.
© 2011, Copyright the Authors. Artificial Organs © 2011, International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21401670      PMCID: PMC4217151          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01213.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  19 in total

1.  Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: influence of tissue electrical properties.

Authors:  W M Grill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management.

Authors:  G Barolat
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer; G G van der Heide; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: determination of excitation thresholds.

Authors:  E N Warman; W M Grill; D Durand
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Limitations on impulse conduction at the branch point of afferent axons in frog dorsal root ganglion.

Authors:  S D Stoney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modification of reflex responses to lumbar posterior root stimulation by motor tasks in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; Karen Minassian; Christian Hofer; Winfried Mayr; Frank Rattay; Milan R Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 7.  Computer modelling of spinal cord stimulation and its contribution to therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  J Holsheimer
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans.

Authors:  M R Dimitrijevic; Y Gerasimenko; M M Pinter
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  A model for transcutaneous current stimulation: simulations and experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Kuhn; Thierry Keller; Marc Lawrence; Manfred Morari
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Jan Holsheimer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2002-01
View more
  44 in total

1.  The effects of paranodal myelin damage on action potential depend on axonal structure.

Authors:  Ehsan Daneshi Kohan; Behnia Shadab Lashkari; Carolyn Jennifer Sparrey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Modification of spasticity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; William B McKay; Keith E Tansey; Winfried Mayr; Helmut Kern; Karen Minassian
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Transspinal direct current stimulation immediately modifies motor cortex sensorimotor maps.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Remote muscle contraction enhances spinal reflexes in multiple lower-limb muscles elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Yohei Masugi; Atsushi Sasaki; Naotsugu Kaneko; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of percutaneous stimulation at different spinal levels on the activation of sensory and motor roots.

Authors:  François D Roy; Grady Gibson; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Neuromodulation of evoked muscle potentials induced by epidural spinal-cord stimulation in paralyzed individuals.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Claudia Angeli; Susan J Harkema; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Electrophysiological mapping of rat sensorimotor lumbosacral spinal networks after complete paralysis.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Roland R Roy; Jaehoon Choe; Hui Zhong; Mandheeraj Singh Nandra; Yu-Chong Tai; Yury Gerasimenko; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Complications of epidural spinal stimulation: lessons from the past and alternatives for the future.

Authors:  Giuliano Taccola; Sean Barber; Phillip J Horner; Humberto A Cerrel Bazo; Dimitry Sayenko
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 10.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.