Literature DB >> 27891626

Does trans-spinal and local DC polarization affect presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression?

D Kaczmarek1,2,3, J Ristikankare1, E Jankowska1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Trans-spinal polarization was recently introduced as a means to improve deficient spinal functions. However, only a few attempts have been made to examine the mechanisms underlying DC actions. We have now examined the effects of DC on two spinal modulatory systems, presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression, considering whether they might weaken exaggerated spinal reflexes and enhance excessively weakened ones. Direct current effects were evoked by using local intraspinal DC application (0.3-0.4 μA) in deeply anaesthetized rats and were compared with the effects of trans-spinal polarization (0.8-1.0 mA). Effects of local intraspinal DC were found to be polarity dependent, as locally applied cathodal polarization enhanced presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression, whereas anodal polarization weakened them. In contrast, both cathodal and anodal trans-spinal polarization facilitated them. The results suggest some common DC-sensitive mechanisms of presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression, because both were facilitated or depressed by DC in parallel. ABSTRACT: Direct current (DC) polarization has been demonstrated to alleviate the effects of various deficits in the operation of the central nervous system. However, the effects of trans-spinal DC stimulation (tsDCS) have been investigated less extensively than the effects of transcranial DC stimulation, and their cellular mechanisms have not been elucidated. The main objectives of this study were, therefore, to extend our previous analysis of DC effects on the excitability of primary afferents and synaptic transmission by examining the effects of DC on two spinal modulatory feedback systems, presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression, in an anaesthetized rat preparation. Other objectives were to compare the effects of locally and trans-spinally applied DC (locDC and tsDCS). Local polarization at the sites of terminal branching of afferent fibres was found to induce polarity-dependent actions on presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression, as cathodal locDC enhanced them and anodal locDC depressed them. In contrast, tsDCS modulated presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression in a polarity-independent fashion because both cathodal and anodal tsDCS facilitated them. The results show that the local presynaptic actions of DC might counteract both excessively strong and excessively weak monosynaptic actions of group Ia and cutaneous afferents. However, they indicate that trans-spinally applied DC might counteract the exaggerated spinal reflexes but have an adverse effect on pathologically weakened spinal activity by additional presynaptic weakening. The results are also relevant for the analysis of the basic properties of presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression because they indicate that some common DC-sensitive mechanisms contribute to them.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct current polarization; postactivation depression; presynaptic inhibition; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27891626      PMCID: PMC5330874          DOI: 10.1113/JP272902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  44 in total

1.  Central inhibitory action attributable to presynaptic depolarization produced by muscle afferent volleys.

Authors:  J C ECCLES; R M ECCLES; F MAGNI
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Presynaptic inhibition of the central actions of flexor reflex afferents.

Authors:  J C ECCLES; P G KOSTYUK; R F SCHMIDT
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Reduction of transmitter output by depolarization.

Authors:  J I HUBBARD; W D WILLIS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Mobilization of transmitter by hyperpolarization.

Authors:  J I HUBBARD; W D WILLIS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Principles and standards for reporting animal experiments in The Journal of Physiology and Experimental Physiology.

Authors:  David Grundy
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Changes of extracellular potassium concentration induced by neuronal activity in the sinal cord of the cat.

Authors:  N Kríz; E Syková; E Ujec; L Vyklický
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Transspinal constant-current long-lasting stimulation: a new method to induce cortical and corticospinal plasticity.

Authors:  Maria Knikou; Luke Dixon; Danielle Santora; Mohamed M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Spinal interneurones; how can studies in animals contribute to the understanding of spinal interneuronal systems in man?

Authors:  E Jankowska; I Hammar
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2002-10

10.  On the mechanism of the post-activation depression of the H-reflex in human subjects.

Authors:  H Hultborn; M Illert; J Nielsen; A Paul; M Ballegaard; H Wiese
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Long-lasting increase in axonal excitability after epidurally applied DC.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska; Dominik Kaczmarek; Francesco Bolzoni; Ingela Hammar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulate the Hoffmann reflexes of healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysisc.

Authors:  Plínio Luna Albuquerque; Thyciane Mendonça; Mayara Campêlo; Lívia Shirahige; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Repeated anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation results in long-term reduction of spasticity in mice with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wagdy Mekhael; Sultana Begum; Sreyashi Samaddar; Mazen Hassan; Pedro Toruno; Malik Ahmed; Alexis Gorin; Michael Maisano; Mark Ayad; Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes.

Authors:  Edgard Morya; Kátia Monte-Silva; Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli; Andre Fonseca; Tommaso Bocci; Faranak Farzan; Raaj Chatterjee; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado; André Russowsky Brunoni; Eva Mezger; Luciane Aparecida Moscaleski; Rodrigo Pegado; João Ricardo Sato; Marcelo Salvador Caetano; Kátia Nunes Sá; Clarice Tanaka; Li Min Li; Abrahão Fontes Baptista; Alexandre Hideki Okano
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 6.  Is there hope that transpinal direct current stimulation corrects motoneuron excitability and provides neuroprotection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?

Authors:  Marcin Bączyk; Piotr Krutki; Daniel Zytnicki
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-01

7.  Spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) in hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP): A sham-controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Gianluca Ardolino; Tommaso Bocci; Martina Nigro; Maurizio Vergari; Alessio Di Fonzo; Sara Bonato; Filippo Cogiamanian; Francesca Cortese; Ilaria Cova; Sergio Barbieri; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Transspinal Direct Current Stimulation Produces Persistent Plasticity in Human Motor Pathways.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Behdad Tahayori; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effects of patterned peripheral nerve stimulation on soleus spinal motor neuron excitability.

Authors:  Samuel Jimenez; Laura Mordillo-Mateos; Michele Dileone; Michela Campolo; Carmen Carrasco-Lopez; Fabricia Moitinho-Ferreira; Tomas Gallego-Izquierdo; Hartwig R Siebner; Josep Valls-Solé; Juan Aguilar; Antonio Oliviero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Mikkel M Beck; Eva R Therkildsen; Christian Svane; Christian Forman; Jakob Lorentzen; Bernard A Conway; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Svend S Geertsen; Jens B Nielsen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.