Literature DB >> 25650107

The effects of selective attention and speech acoustics on neural speech-tracking in a multi-talker scene.

Johanna M Rimmele1, Elana Zion Golumbic2, Erich Schröger3, David Poeppel4.   

Abstract

Attending to one speaker in multi-speaker situations is challenging. One neural mechanism proposed to underlie the ability to attend to a particular speaker is phase-locking of low-frequency activity in auditory cortex to speech's temporal envelope ("speech-tracking"), which is more precise for attended speech. However, it is not known what brings about this attentional effect, and specifically if it reflects enhanced processing of the fine structure of attended speech. To investigate this question we compared attentional effects on speech-tracking of natural versus vocoded speech which preserves the temporal envelope but removes the fine structure of speech. Pairs of natural and vocoded speech stimuli were presented concurrently and participants attended to one stimulus and performed a detection task while ignoring the other stimulus. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) and compared attentional effects on the speech-tracking response in auditory cortex. Speech-tracking of natural, but not vocoded, speech was enhanced by attention, whereas neural tracking of ignored speech was similar for natural and vocoded speech. These findings suggest that the more precise speech-tracking of attended natural speech is related to processing its fine structure, possibly reflecting the application of higher-order linguistic processes. In contrast, when speech is unattended its fine structure is not processed to the same degree and thus elicits less precise speech-tracking more similar to vocoded speech.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory cortex; Fine structure; Linguistic; Predictions; Speech envelope

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25650107      PMCID: PMC4475476          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  68 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  From dichotic listening to the irrelevant sound effect: a behavioural and neuroimaging analysis of the processing of unattended speech.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Andrew M Bridges; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations.

Authors:  Johanna Rimmele; Hajnal Jolsvai; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Suppression of competing speech through entrainment of cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Cort Horton; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Jonathan E Peelle; Robert P Carlyon; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neuronal oscillations and speech perception: critical-band temporal envelopes are the essence.

Authors:  Oded Ghitza; Anne-Lise Giraud; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  29 in total

1.  Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Somarowthu; Nai Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-11

2.  Syllables in Sync Form a Link: Neural Phase-locking Reflects Word Knowledge during Language Learning.

Authors:  Laura Batterink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  High-frequency neural activity predicts word parsing in ambiguous speech streams.

Authors:  Anne Kösem; Anahita Basirat; Leila Azizi; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Low-Frequency Oscillations Code Speech during Verbal Working Memory.

Authors:  Johannes Gehrig; Georgios Michalareas; Marie-Therese Forster; Juan Lei; Pavel Hok; Helmut Laufs; Christian Senft; Volker Seifert; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Simon Hanslmayr; Christian A Kell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Shared and modality-specific brain regions that mediate auditory and visual word comprehension.

Authors:  Anne Keitel; Joachim Gross; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Attention selectively modulates cortical entrainment in different regions of the speech spectrum.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Cort Horton; Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience.

Authors:  Rachel Reetzke; G Nike Gnanateja; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.