Literature DB >> 17582338

Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Huan Luo1, David Poeppel.   

Abstract

How natural speech is represented in the auditory cortex constitutes a major challenge for cognitive neuroscience. Although many single-unit and neuroimaging studies have yielded valuable insights about the processing of speech and matched complex sounds, the mechanisms underlying the analysis of speech dynamics in human auditory cortex remain largely unknown. Here, we show that the phase pattern of theta band (4-8 Hz) responses recorded from human auditory cortex with magnetoencephalography (MEG) reliably tracks and discriminates spoken sentences and that this discrimination ability is correlated with speech intelligibility. The findings suggest that an approximately 200 ms temporal window (period of theta oscillation) segments the incoming speech signal, resetting and sliding to track speech dynamics. This hypothesized mechanism for cortical speech analysis is based on the stimulus-induced modulation of inherent cortical rhythms and provides further evidence implicating the syllable as a computational primitive for the representation of spoken language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17582338      PMCID: PMC2703451          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  39 in total

1.  Brain-wave representation of words by superposition of a few sine waves.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Single auditory neurons rapidly discriminate conspecific communication signals.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Hartmut Schütze; Astrid Franz; Olga Kolesnikova; Martin B Stemmler; Bernhard Ronacher; Andreas V M Herz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Israel Nelken
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Distinct time scales in cortical discrimination of natural sounds in songbirds.

Authors:  Rajiv Narayan; Gilberto Graña; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Brain wave recognition of words.

Authors:  P Suppes; Z L Lu; B Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Concurrent encoding of frequency and amplitude modulation in human auditory cortex: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Huan Luo; Yadong Wang; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech--a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Stuart Rosen; Harriet Lang; Richard J S Wise
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  290 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Authors:  Miika Koskinen; Jaakko Viinikanoja; Mikko Kurimo; Arto Klami; Samuel Kaski; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener's cortex to the reader's voice.

Authors:  Mathieu Bourguignon; Xavier De Tiège; Marc Op de Beeck; Noémie Ligot; Philippe Paquier; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Riitta Hari; Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Neurons with stereotyped and rapid responses provide a reference frame for relative temporal coding in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Romain Brasselet; Stefano Panzeri; Nikos K Logothetis; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sensitivity to temporal modulation rate and spectral bandwidth in the human auditory system: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Yadong Wang; Nai Ding; Nayef Ahmar; Juanjuan Xiang; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cell assemblies.

Authors:  Ryan T Canolty; Karunesh Ganguly; Steven W Kennerley; Charles F Cadieu; Kilian Koepsell; Jonathan D Wallis; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.