Literature DB >> 17334212

From dichotic listening to the irrelevant sound effect: a behavioural and neuroimaging analysis of the processing of unattended speech.

C Philip Beaman1, Andrew M Bridges, Sophie K Scott.   

Abstract

The assumption that ignoring irrelevant sound in a serial recall situation is identical to ignoring a non-target channel in dichotic listening is challenged. Dichotic listening is open to moderating effects of working memory capacity (Conway et al., 2001) whereas irrelevant sound effects (ISE) are not (Beaman, 2004). A right ear processing bias is apparent in dichotic listening, whereas the bias is to the left ear in the ISE (Hadlington et al., 2004). Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging data (Scott et al., 2004, submitted) show bilateral activation of the superior temporal gyrus (STG) in the presence of intelligible, but ignored, background speech and right hemisphere activation of the STG in the presence of unintelligible background speech. It is suggested that the right STG may be involved in the ISE and a particularly strong left ear effect might occur because of the contralateral connections in audition. It is further suggested that left STG activity is associated with dichotic listening effects and may be influenced by working memory span capacity. The relationship of this functional and neuroanatomical model to known neural correlates of working memory is considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17334212     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70450-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  9 in total

1.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

2.  The effects of selective attention and speech acoustics on neural speech-tracking in a multi-talker scene.

Authors:  Johanna M Rimmele; Elana Zion Golumbic; Erich Schröger; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Visual input enhances selective speech envelope tracking in auditory cortex at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana Zion Golumbic; Gregory B Cogan; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Paying attention to speech: The role of working memory capacity and professional experience.

Authors:  Bar Lambez; Galit Agmon; Paz Har-Shai Yahav; Yuri Rassovsky; Elana Zion Golumbic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations.

Authors:  Bjørn Saetrevik; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 6.  Hemispheric specialization in selective attention and short-term memory: a fine-coarse model of left- and right-ear disadvantages.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Lea K Pilgrim; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

7.  Functional Gait Can Be Affected by Noise: Effects of Age and Cognitive Function: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Margot Buyle; Viktoria Azoidou; Marousa Pavlou; Vincent Van Rompaey; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert Ljung; Anatole Nöstl; Emma Threadgold; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-21

9.  The Dynamics of Attention Shifts Among Concurrent Speech in a Naturalistic Multi-speaker Virtual Environment.

Authors:  Keren Shavit-Cohen; Elana Zion Golumbic
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.