Literature DB >> 26362546

Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech.

Ying-Yee Kong1,2, Ala Somarowthu3, Nai Ding4.   

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of spectral degradation on cortical speech encoding in complex auditory scenes. Young normal-hearing listeners were simultaneously presented with two speech streams and were instructed to attend to only one of them. The speech mixtures were subjected to noise-channel vocoding to preserve the temporal envelope and degrade the spectral information of speech. Each subject was tested with five spectral resolution conditions (unprocessed speech, 64-, 32-, 16-, and 8-channel vocoder conditions) and two target-to-masker ratio (TMR) conditions (3 and 0 dB). Ongoing electroencephalographic (EEG) responses and speech comprehension were measured in each spectral and TMR condition for each subject. Neural tracking of each speech stream was characterized by cross-correlating the EEG responses with the envelope of each of the simultaneous speech streams at different time lags. Results showed that spectral degradation and TMR both significantly influenced how top-down attention modulated the EEG responses to the attended and unattended speech. That is, the EEG responses to the attended and unattended speech streams differed more for the higher (unprocessed, 64 ch, and 32 ch) than the lower (16 and 8 ch) spectral resolution conditions, as well as for the higher (3 dB) than the lower TMR (0 dB) condition. The magnitude of differential neural modulation responses to the attended and unattended speech streams significantly correlated with speech comprehension scores. These results suggest that severe spectral degradation and low TMR hinder speech stream segregation, making it difficult to employ top-down attention to differentially process different speech streams.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory scene analysis; cochlear implant; cortical entrainment; event-related potentials; sound segregation; spectral degradation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26362546      PMCID: PMC4636590          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0540-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  40 in total

1.  Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Differential modulation of auditory responses to attended and unattended speech in different listening conditions.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Nai Ding
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Voice discrimination in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.

Authors:  Z Massida; P Belin; C James; J Rouger; B Fraysse; P Barone; O Deguine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Suppression of competing speech through entrainment of cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Cort Horton; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: functional roles and interpretations.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural tracking of attended versus ignored speech is differentially affected by hearing loss.

Authors:  Eline Borch Petersen; Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Speech Intelligibility Predicted from Neural Entrainment of the Speech Envelope.

Authors:  Jonas Vanthornhout; Lien Decruy; Jan Wouters; Jonathan Z Simon; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-20

5.  Dynamic Encoding of Acoustic Features in Neural Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Bahar Khalighinejad; Guilherme Cruzatto da Silva; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Poor early cortical differentiation of speech predicts perceptual difficulties of severely hearing-impaired listeners in multi-talker environments.

Authors:  Brandon T Paul; Mila Uzelac; Emmanuel Chan; Andrew Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cortical entrainment to speech produced by cochlear implant talkers and normal-hearing talkers.

Authors:  Shruthi Raghavendra; Sungmin Lee; Hyungi Chun; Brett A Martin; Chin-Tuan Tan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech.

Authors:  Frauke Kraus; Sarah Tune; Anna Ruhe; Jonas Obleser; Malte Wöstmann
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Neural Representation of Concurrent Vowels in Macaque Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Christophe Micheyl; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-06-10

10.  Pre- and post-target cortical processes predict speech-in-noise performance.

Authors:  Subong Kim; Adam T Schwalje; Andrew S Liu; Phillip E Gander; Bob McMurray; Timothy D Griffiths; Inyong Choi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.